What race is this?

distinguished and tasteful

that is definitely not cgi but after effects with green screen as background (real person doing the movements)

I don't understand how Disney live action remakes are 99% CGI but don't get classified as animation. Lion King remake has precisely ZERO NONE NICH human characters.
Do americans think that watching animation makes them babies or some shit

Alita is all CGI, that's mocap
youtube.com/watch?v=hOMuRopLgxg

Attached: Screen-Shot-2019-02-01-at-9.14.05-AM-1200x628.jpg (1200x628, 29K)

Character is modeled based on and played by Rosa Salazar
Salazar is a surname meaning old hall (from Castilian Sala (hall) and Basque zahar (old)). The name originates from the town of the same name: Salazar, in northern Burgos, Castile.
So la mutto de las Españas i suppose

Mongolian

Finnish

Thank you Alejandro. Very cool.

Unironically, yes. Americans think animation is for children.

Disney is, ironically, to blame because they correctly noticed that children love animation (it's suprastimuli) and marketed their efforts towards children at the expense of adults. "Saturday Morning Cartoons" evolved from there, and animation became mostly marketed towards children and teenagers. Because of this, most American animation tends to be "safe" for children (by American standards).

Family Guy, Futurama, Bojack Horseman, and Rick and Morty represent a class of "adult animation"; it's noteworthy that it needs to be explicitly stated as "adult" animation. It's animation, for ADULTS, as opposed to children. These are still comedies and relatively simplistic (because animation has to be funny, and simple), but they have sex, drugs, and swear words.

For the majority of Americans the idea of something being simultaneously serious and not live-action is mind boggling: If it was supposed to be serious, it wouldn't be animated, and if it's animated it's not supposed to be serious.

fuck off grandpa

Marsian

>Do americans think that watching animation makes them babies or some shit

Yes.

As an older example, when Akira was released in North America in the late 80s many of the local movie critics of the time here were actually mind boggled by the idea of animation that wasn't intended for children age 1-10. I'm not talking they were surprised by the movie, many of them were shocked by the concept of adult animation.

its anime

Creaturaoid

this is an ongoing debate in the animation community. Another exemple is the movie gravity, which is 99% animation, but for the faces of George Clooney and Sandra Bullock.

why did they have to CGI a real person in a movie that isn't CGI is the real question

To visually underscore her 'other-ness'.

Because she has typical ayy lmao anime eyes in Gunnm so they just felt they had to achieve a similar look within a live action film so they had to CG on gigantic eyes.

Attached: 22046030_10156677615634554_5409964844045018984_n.png (720x540, 473K)

Latina

why the other cyborgs had normal faces then

Attached: images(2).jpg (240x210, 11K)

Spotted the NPC.

Attached: 1550183991630.jpg (500x548, 56K)

i think its explained she's a social model but the scientist modifies her to a battle model

Hispanic :3