Would you prefer a Europe with borders as nonsensical as Africa's?

Would you prefer a Europe with borders as nonsensical as Africa's?

Attached: 2017-07-11_00h16_44.png (887x696, 556K)

I don't like that great Bavaria goes this much up north, but all in all it's a pretty based and redpilled map

I thought this was supposed to be mimicking the borders of US states.

I kek’d at West Lebanon

It already is.

Tbf Iberia looked exactly like that 1000 years ago

I just want the Greater Kongo...

Attached: Greater Kongo.png (428x406, 12K)

I doubt it, we'd never have a single city state.

Well, too bad African savages couldn't even found their own states.

Nor does this map.

What is D.C.?

>Random diagonal lines ignoring natural boundaries
>Borders are entirely square and angular for no reason
>Literal notches cut into countries' borders for cities like London and Paris
Even Africa's borders aren't this bad, this is just a stupid exaggeration

A federal territory, similar to Berlin or Brasilia.

>Even Africa's borders aren't this bad, this is just a stupid exaggeration

Attached: 1552243056502.png (1080x1246, 35K)

>The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations

Attached: Rhode_Island_population_map.png (600x600, 124K)

It's true. Almost all of the straight borders in Africa are through deserts, and most countries have borders defined by rivers and mountains rather than random angular garbage like in the OP. If you think this low-effort shit is anything similar to how a colonized country would look, you should probably read a book.

London broseph
Not a state

>republic of london
>london barely even in it
based

>Borders are entirely square and angular for no reason
>If you think this low-effort shit is anything similar to how a colonized country would look

Berlin is a State, though.

The straight borders in africa formed due to agreements between colonial powers. For example, Namibia has a straight Eastern border because the Germans needed to compromise with the British when they divided the region. However, the map in the OP is completely exaggerated and the entire map looks like it was made by cutting wood. Even on the relatively square Namibia, there are borders defined by the rivers. In the 'colonized Europe' map, however, most borders ignore rivers and mountains. There is a diagonal line going over the Pyrenees for fucks sake.

Attached: namibia.png (600x590, 69K)

besides Republic of London, these borders aren't that bad 2bh

>nonsensical
If they don't like it those niggers can change it anytime.