The US has had zero dictatorships, while almost all of europe has. Is it because the US has guns?

The US has had zero dictatorships, while almost all of europe has. Is it because the US has guns?

Attached: Apugliacci.jpg (1143x628, 177K)

No, it's because it ihasn't had time. USA is a very young nation compared to europe

All governments are dictatorships since I didn't consent to it.

The US is a tyranny of the mob.

but nations in Europe developed dictatorships while the US existed

redpilled

No, only if there was a coup foiled by the guns of the people could you claim that the US has had no dictatorship thanks to its guns

And? Those nations have been around for hundreds, even thousands of years. Government change, leaders come and go.
Give your own country a couple millennia and your own history will look equally fucked.

It's because the US fuels the rest of dictatorships

WIll you be my nanny?

USA is smart enough to understand the power of good pr so they run an aristocratic shadow government instead of going public

American history was fucked from the start. Did you know what redblooded american viruses did to the native americans? I would've been fine if they just went back to native america.

It's because we have a strong constitution and common law (thanks UK and thanks enlightenment philosophers/founding fathers)

C O P E

>wtf SLAVERY and PRE MODERN MEDICINE!?!?!??!! WTF WTF HISTORY IS EVIL AND RACIST!!

trump is a dictator.

FDR and AJ were the closest we had to dictators but fdr is loved by authoritarian leftist historians and history teachers

oh, the USA is badguy??!!!

Attached: usa is bad guy.png (1689x809, 205K)

Your ruling party can literally appoint supreme court justices through the senate, where's the division of powers there?

> bombing war criminals you gave power
Thanks america

Why are you talking about a subdivision of europoorope as if it was a separate thing? nu-europoors are odd.

>the ruling party
Is this bait? They also need the president to appoint judges in the first place. Also until Harry Reid it required 60 votes in the senate, and most judges were voted for 98-0

Also we have a supreme court that actually protects our freedoms and for example voted 9-0 against "hate speech" exception to free speech

no because people in this country worship the constitution like it was written by god himself.

Well honestly the founding fathers were more based than anyone since. Fuck your shitty authoritarian bullshit

The US may not have a problem with dictators but we do have a problem with the executive branch continuously claiming more power for itself.

>Fuck your shitty authoritarian bullshit
what exactly did I say to trigger this emotion? when did i say I supported authoritarian bullshit?

US population having guns is a meme, if they had indeed, there would be perpetual civil war in that failed babylonian empire

They are as disarmed as us poolaks....xept the bolice..but then the bolice work for jews,not the peepo

>He doesn't know about Louisiana

Attached: IMG_3486.jpg (215x300, 6K)

This this this. Also the federales claiming more and more

Objectively wrong, one of them was a dipshit athiest

It's the 21st century. Their ideas are outdated, user. It's time to move on.

Atheism is based. So is non-Christian theism

Let's go down the list
George Washington?
Based.
James Madison?
Based.
George Mason?
Based.
Thomas Jefferson?
Based.
John Jay?
Based.

Yeah lol its the 21st century so marxism and half baked idealistic theories of government are cool now

Freedom is never outdated. Although constitution failed because it failed to prevent the american government to growing to the size it is now.

>Thomas Jefferson
>James Madison

Literal retards who neutered the army and navy because of their dumb obsession with civilians militias. They left us ill-prepared for the War of 1812.

>All of the Founding Fathers

Retards who kicked the can of slavery down the road because they were too pussy to deal with it themselves. This allowed the South to develop an even more racist ideology to justify slavery and made getting rid of slavery harder.

Yikes

>associating the Foudning Fathers with freedom when they allowed slavery

The Constitution evolved because government needs to do more than run a post office. Do you think we should get rid of the military? Do you hate Social Security, Medicare? Are you against Interstate Highway System?

As much as I agree they kicked the can of the topic of slavery down the line I hardly expect them to bring it up and do something about it right after forming the US? I mean can you imagine trying to get a bunch of colonial provinces to band together and then say something like "we should get rid of slavery". Gl getting them all on board when you need it

Pretty sure some of the single states were founded as autocratic theocracies before they were brought into the fold of the republican federal government.

It was the time to do it, honestly. This is before the cotton boom when when there was a general sense that slavery would probably die out on its won, and it was peacefully abolished in a lot of states around this time.

>social security
Yikes. A ponzi scheme based on ww2 era birth rates
>medicare
OK but too many people get it

Yikes post

>military
The only halfway justifiable government institution
> Do you hate Social Security, Medicare? Are you against Interstate Highway System?
Yes. Socialism is cancer.

Holy shit, I never realized that. I love guns now.

I guess. The US was just weak at that time and I don't think it would be best to bring up such a heavy topic

why is this thread still going after this post?
this is the epitome of /thread