Hmm...

>hmm, where shall I get my news in a world of corporate media and covert shilling for thousands of retarded special interests?
>well, I’m sure the official news service of the British Government, which has been broadcasting since the Empire, is a good place to start
>go to bbc.com
> “The unique Finnish word for ‘community’ that nobody can translate”
> “Is religion becoming obsolete?”
>”Reviving Australia’s forgotten languages”
> “Behind the symbolism of this Russian Jewish socialist’s artwork”
> “What straight people need to understand about gays”
> “This unique village in Mozambique installed one (1) solar panel”


I’m paraphrasing but anyone who regularly checks the website (not sure about the television or radio) knows that this mundane, unuseful, trivial bullshit makes up a very high portion of what is emitted by the BBC

So why the fuck do British people still fund them? When did the BBC switch from being an informative, respectable news outlet, with the blessing of the State, to the current mass of cognitively depressing, meaningless effusion that it is today?

Attached: 523814DF-B4EA-4275-A187-44DA29C3EA67.png (1200x900, 38K)

>reading non-pidgin BBC

This was your first mistake.

Attached: informate me.jpg (855x2178, 529K)

Attached: bbc pidgin rats.jpg (680x898, 190K)

>Christchurch shootings: 49 pipo die for di deadliest shooting for di history of New Zealand
>Heart Break: Researchers don find out say e fit kill pesin
>Michael Jackson: Wetin go happun to di late pop star Legacy?
>Brexit: British MPs don reject anoda Brexit Deal
>Boeing: List of kontries wey don suspend Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft
>Lion wey man keep for im backyard don pieces am to death

Based.

You can't expect critical thinking from NPCs. I learned to question narratives and consume unbiased reporting so now I get my international news from RT and Sputnik.

when they decided to appeal to young people for whatever reason

how is this shit real

Attached: pidgin.png (356x486, 141K)

BBC doesn't even know where Finland is.

The Pidgin site is a bit more shrewd than people give it credit for. Remember that it runs on the World Service, which has a mission statement not unlike that of Radio Free Europe.

You mean it indoctrinates innocent Ugandans with Bong propaganda?

Deutsche Welle is what the BBC should be

Jar Jar lel

For decades promotions at the BBC were handled directly by MI5

Probably still true

Just because they do investigative and cultural journalism too doesn't make it 'unuseful'. You clearly have biases but if you just want to hear the news follow your countries far more partisan news sources that are funded by private interest groups and billionaires

I wouldn't say it indocrinates them, but there is something of a colonial air about it. If you look at the languages extant in the World Service they are all political hotspots or areas of heavily contested influence.

>you clearly have biases

Such as?

The BBC has a huge leftist bias

>Just because they do investigative and cultural journalism too doesn't make it 'unuseful'. You clearly have biases but if you just want to hear the news follow your countries far more partisan news sources that are funded by private interest groups and billionaires

Attached: big-brother-is-watching-you-94815124855-1-1340x754.png (1340x754, 172K)

Anti-lobbyist & Anti-Imperialist

I was using it figuratively. Everyone has biases but I'm sure the majority of people here are decently educated people who are able to interpret and educate themselves on issues without the consent of millionaire talk show hosts from multiple sources

If the right says that the BBC is left-wing and the left says that the BBC is right-wing then I think the BBC is neutral

Do all South Americans think in binary?

You should watch question time at least once. In their effort for impartiality they end up inviting the same right wing questioners all over the country.
Of course you could bring up panorama but that seems to be ongoing

So what would you rather. Pick your poison

You'd be surprised at the number of people here who use Breitbart as a primary source

m8, please don't tell lies to people.

I've been writing up on Steve Bannon for a while now. He loves to start out his talks with agreeable centrist jargon and swerve to conspiracy. His movies are boring pieces of shit but he is a good speaker

Should I not? Tommy Tommy Tommy Robinson. Do I fit in more now?

>The left thinks it has a right wing bias
>The right thinks it has a left wing bias
Sounds pretty based to me

bait.

BBC is great for headlines. stop scrolling too far. that's where you see the "light" news

>da, comrade, state info good, muslim immigration good

Attached: fead1863e3e07c6d794c685a4ee51cf9.jpg (411x620, 59K)

The left things that anything right of Stalin is right wing

That's how most conspiracy theorists push their drivel, yeah.You should send a link when you're done my dude.
Stop

Attached: Miffed Angry.png (1000x1000, 49K)

Very good swerve. Wish we could get Argentine immigrants
The right things

*thinks

Remember when the BBC was totally NOT bias at ALL against the Scottish Referendum.

remember when scots thought anyone else cared

>hail glorious leader May, britain was always Eurasia

Attached: 1553219251261.jpg (1200x675, 236K)

>Gives an example of the BBC's bias.
>That doesn't matter user.
I think you mistook the big black cock you are choking on for the British Broadcasting Cult

>be jock
>get lightly challenged
>immediately start expounding on interracial cuckolding
suppose i shouldn't be surprised