Why is socialism such a blood thirsty religion?

Why is socialism such a blood thirsty religion?

Attached: dc2ad1474533805.jpg (236x340, 19K)

God wills it.

Attached: christcom1.jpg (1250x1838, 1.46M)

>national socialism is socialism because the word "socialism" is in it

Attached: 1514987524615.png (866x900, 88K)

Name five (5) differences between socialism and national socialism

Attached: nazis capitalist.jpg (2133x2803, 2.6M)

>seizing private property is not socialism
>forbidding people from doing business is not socialism
>allowing peasants and dirt poor kids to become an elite force is not socialism
>"equality and prosperity for germans!" is not socialism
>nationalization of most of the businesses is not socialism

Attached: britbong.png (645x729, 65K)

see

>muh Jow Forums infographics
the absolute state

The manlet himself called himself a socialist and your pic is shit.
Both communism and natsoc are left-wing crap. But natsoc is the rightest of the left-wing ideologies

I only can found national

national socialism isn't inherently leftist or right wing, it combines the two efficiently.
The easiest way to describe it is centrist authoritarian, with it being leftist economically and right wing socially, but even then it isn't honest because of private property ownership.

There WAS socialism in programs like Hitler Youth, though

>allowing peasants and dirt poor kids to become an elite force is not socialism
That's a lie.

>an anti nazi infographic
>Jow Forums

>The manlet himself called himself a socialist

And North Korea calls itself democratic. Self appointed titles and actions are not the same.

t. someone who hasn't witnessed the annual commie Jow Forums raids
newfag pls go

Wasn't Nazi Germany basically like a more extreme and autistic version of China's current state capitalism?

yeah because I don't go on Jow Forums because I'm not autistic

SS was formed of sons of drunk whores from villages because they had a proper skull shape
NSDAP is the party of WORKERS
The businesses weren't allowed to free trade and the market was state-dominated

>The businesses weren't allowed to free trade and the market was state-dominated

Attached: nazis socialist342.jpg (2765x1308, 932K)

>the NSDAP is the party of the WORKERS
>many members of the inner circle were aristocrats

There's no point in arguing with leftists about it, you will just go in circles forever. Everything to the right of Marx is fAsCiSm

There's some elements of socialism in there such as increased government spending, investments into consumer products (Volkswagen radio for everyone etc...), public infrastructure projects with the welfare of the population in mind, and intrusion of the state in the private life of individuals
But on a whole Nazi economics wasn't socialist as the essays in the infograph (they chose the worst parts btw) are right, they privitized and didn't nationalize

Attached: volkswagen.jpg (640x428, 117K)

>the SS
>an elite force
Good joke

Yes, they had a little of free market. Compared to USSR.
>many members of the inner circle were aristocrats
And now find me even a quote with someone of those aristocrats who were advocating monarchism.
Pro tip: you can't
Nazis were progressives and the government was above the market and businesses

So it was basically what this leaf says Some kind of authoritarian capitalism. All the companies had to do what the government says otherwise they will be shut down.

>And now find me even a quote with someone of those aristocrats who were advocating monarchism.

A large segment of the SA consisted of Der Stahlhelm and other Monarchistic organisations. Of course the Nazis would suck their cock whilst at the same time retaining Germanys republicanism, because the NSDAP tried to look appealing to everyone in the political compass, only of course to remove all later political opponents, the majority of them being Marxist.

Nah mate, find me a quote.
If somebody would say something like that in public he'd be shot on the spot

nice non-argument
have sex

lol ok incel

Nazi Germany upheld private property. It had a lot of state programs so in the American sense it was "socialist". You can claim it was corporatist and strangleholded by large business monopolies. Don't know if that's true though.