Why 50% of Brazil look like this? Why so flat?

Why 50% of Brazil look like this? Why so flat?

Attached: 215403.jpg (1080x1587, 749K)

>50% of Brazil looks like that
>they still choose to live in the mountains
what could this mean?

do you want them to build mountains

It's extremely flat and depopulated

Attached: 220153.jpg (1080x1603, 999K)

>Brazil is Rio de Janeiro

illegal forestry, unchecked government forestry leading to semi-desertitication and the extinction of millions of species.

Where are the people in their countryside?

Attached: 33220811.jpg (1080x1694, 1.05M)

>deforestation

Shut up, this is native vegetation

>why so flat?
several geological events that happened millions of years ago, like most of the country being under the sea for a really long time, also the fact that the country is located over one single tectonic plate so not many earthquakes or other terraforming events happen here.
also the other 50% of the country is pic related ad infinitum

Attached: serra-negra.jpg (720x480, 203K)

Mata Atlantica was almost completely destroyed

None of OP pics are from this area, dumb monkey

OP's pics are from the cerrado, retard

Thats where they burned down the amazon to make shitty, poorly managed farms.

>where are the people in their countryside
in the countryside of the actually populated areas, not in the middle of bumfuck nowhere in Mato Grosso.

All of the three pics are far away from the Amazon or Rio de Janeiro or any stereotype area you know from TV

>shitty, poorly managed farms
lmao our farms are better than american ones, what are you even talking about

The pic you quoted is from Paraná.

Isn't São Paulo your most populated state?

Attached: 41222654.jpg (1080x1723, 743K)

>central paraná
no one lives there either. People live near the capital, in the north or close to borders (with paraguay or SC)

For a country with 210 million of people it's very depopulated.

nibba even in portugal there are going to be sections of roads with not a living soul in sight, and portugal is a small country.

sometimes you're going to have huge farms without any villages in the middle. that's the benefit of having a big country where you have lots of farmable land

thank God 210 million people aren't enough to fill a country like Brasil, otherwise we'd be completely fucked

Attached: 26174342_15581_GDO.png (800x751, 620K)

90% of Plains and Mountain states look like this too. Grass, cows and zero people

People in 18th century had balls to build new cities in the middle of nowhere. They even knew how to build houses.

Nowadays people are too weak and dependant to abandon big cities.

Look again. In all images you can see fences in them. These are areas of planting. So there are people living in them, and planting… pois é…

Attached: 12519402_273632719636163_1199572713_n.jpg (640x640, 135K)

there are no jobs outside big cities, you retard

brazil is so boring it has no cool mountains,
no beautiful forest, no volcanos, no tornado and tsunamis
i fucking hate this country

Attached: 1556496132585.jpg (250x214, 9K)

He has a point. There were no jobs in New England either. They built everything.

>brazil is so boring it has [...] no volcanos, no tornado and tsunamis
You should try reading the retarded shit you post lmao

they are cool as fuck

Boring? Yes. Ugly? No. I prefer 1000 times a green field and some trees than a desert with "cool mountains"

jobs are everywhere
they just don't pay good

>the other 50%
>ad infinitum

Attached: image.jpg (417x443, 239K)

> I suffer in my geologically stable and cataclism free country

brazilians mistreat their livestock though

Never had a single case of mad cow disease here.

we don't

yeah, why don't people abandon all that they have and start building houses in the middle of nowhere.
God, you're stupid.

lmao, 90% of Kazakhstan looks like this, no joke

Attached: 20161019085030.jpg (800x533, 284K)

you know they are cool and interesting