Why is Russia's population so low? A country that large should have a much larger population. What's going on?

it's Poland and Belarus not Russia

it's 143.5 million too high

Egypt already has 100 million people, and is set to have a population of 200 million in 2100.

A small desert country, where everyone is crowded around a a single river... Why aren't Russians having kids?

Attached: egydens.jpg (791x1024, 122K)

Poland didn't lose 1/3 of population, but 16%. Belarus lost quarter of population.

You are forgetting something, anglo. It's 146.8 million.

The Russians kept ethnically depopulating everybody and genocided uncountable amount of people. Everything east of Moscow was made Russian by killing all the people there until there was nobody by Russians left. The finno-ugrics, Altaics, turkish, siberian, mongolian, caucus people were all killed and wiped out by Russians. Hitler could only fantasize about this.

Siberia is very severe. Europeans don't realize just how mild their weather is for their latitudes

Bring kids to this world
brings kids to Russia
That is just so cruel.
My dumb cousin gave birth to 3 children already and she has barely any means to raise them properly. I hate her for such stupid decision.

Massive abortion.
The same reason Serbia had Kosovo overpopulated by Albinos.

>Why aren't Russians having kids?
Because we are overpopulated.

nobody lost 1/3

Oh really?

Attached: Dens.png (5460x3150, 865K)

Yeah, really. The traffic in major cities is horrible and house prices are huge.

Is this true that Europen Russia have negative birthrate, while Asian Russia have positive one?

>Europen Russia
>Asian Russia
What?

everything east of the Ural mountains is Asia retard

Dumb Yank.

Attached: 1549349913265.jpg (600x315, 16K)

Not at all.
Only muslim regions have positive population growth and they all are in the "European" part.

Dude. West of the Urals - European Russia
East of the Urals - Asian Russia.

Do you really think that there is suddenly any difference just because you went to the east of Ural?
A нe пoйти ли тeбe нaхyй?

There is no difference. We have non-Russian republics in both parts, if that's what you referred to.

Yes. Finno-Ugric population grows while Slavic falls

Attached: 1508885549780.jpg (1220x1160, 633K)

A better question is why is Bangladesh population so bloody high? Whites here constantly moan about not being able to afford kids, yet it doesn't seem to stop the south asians!

North Caucasus, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Yakutia, Buryatia and other "republics" have natural growth rate of population. Russian regions in both European and Asian parts of Russia have population decline (which is compensated by immigration to some extent).

South Asians and Africans are bored and have a ton of free time. Let 'em fuck.

That's Bangladesh

Can't let them fuck, because global warming will bring them all here in 30 years time.

the map projection makes land closer to equator appear way smaller than it actually is

I'm pretty sure that Russia would look like completely different in few decades.

Ethnic russians/whites emigrate from Russia (especially smart ones) while Central Asians immigrate to Russia. We now have a historical peak of emigration

Is 500+ million people possible for Russia? Are there any government plans to rapidly increase population numbers?

China has a billion+ people and an economy that's much larger than your own. Doesn't that worry you a little?

The entirety of Europe will be completely different in a few decades, even with white russians moving here.

>Is 500+ million people possible for Russia?
No.

Kike communist vermin killing millions of people

>Is 500+ million people possible for Russia?
Yeah, it's possible due to our govt's current plan to replace our natives and russians with uneducated cheap labor force from Central Asia.

They kill themselves a lot

The geography of the country wouldn't allow it?

That and their mentality

Geography, infrastructure, economy.

According to the "United Nations" pessimistic scenario, the population of Russia will be less than one hundred million by 2078.
lenta.ru/news/2019/06/17/less_100_millions/

(And 160 kk by optimistic scenario with migrants and ban on oborts)

>infrastructure, economy.

These things never stopped the world's poorest countries from having insane population growth.

>Geography

Tell me about this one, please.

>never stopped the world's poorest countries
Russia is poor, but not that poor.
>Tell me about this one, please.
Why don't you just use google?

Attached: w2t5f116wop21[1].png (2600x2080, 1.12M)

> The Anglos kept ethnically depopulating everybody and genocided uncountable amount of people. Everything west of Ireland was made English by killing all the people there until there was nobody by Anglos left. The Chinook, Cherokee, Apache, Dakhota, Iroquois people were all killed and wiped out by Anglos. Hitler could only fantasize about this.

So Russia and Canada will benefit from global warming. Nice.

Stop fishing for cheap (you)s by playing up our negative stereotypes you worthless nigger.

>Why is Russia's population so low?
low testosterone

Attached: D5wCPnBWwAEkKcG.jpg (1200x687, 106K)

Russian will HUGELY benefit from that.

Attached: Temperature 18jun.jpg (1835x775, 308K)

Well, not really. Saint Petersburg will go under water and the heat will be unbearable due to continental climate.
Чтo?

Do Chinese have high T?

Russia is in this sweet spot of not being poor enough so that retarded families would want to have 10 children and being rich enough to just want to be selfish and only bother with 1-2 children.
Also it's practically a nightmare to raise more than 1-2 children in the fucking commieblocks.

yes.
Not even after many self-genocides, they got that horny gene in them
youtube.com/watch?v=qgUhujxKx5c

Attached: D7vhNU2WkAABEQU.jpg (704x969, 94K)

1. WWI
2. Civil war
3. Collectivisation
4. Famine in 30s
5. WWII
6. High consuption of alcohol in 70-80s
7. The dissolution of the USSR and total economic disaster in 90s
8. Corruption and sanctions today
That's it.
The whole twentieth century was litteraly hell.

Attached: 1549494426373.jpg (500x500, 208K)

That's due to poor planning, greedy landlords/developers and lack of adequate public transport, not population.

They aren't the ones harming the planet, your corporations are.

That's due to shitty infrastructure that can't handle that amount of people. How is that not overpopulation?

>Third largest country in the world
>Only 327 million people.

Explain

Attached: usa_shade.jpg (1018x635, 150K)

No one will benefit from climate change, you fucking morons. All it is going to take is a few keystone species to die out and the world will rapidly run out of food. Even something as seemingly irrelevant as algae blooms from change in water ph can lead to a cycle of failures in the local food web that can kill off species which are dependant upon as a food source for millions of other animals. Animals which migrate and in that process spread bacteria and other organic manner which plant life have evolved to depend on.
When ecosystems collapse, the damage is rarely ever isolated. It is also worth understanding that most of our oxygen supply is regulated by the oceans.

Based retard falling for western propaganda.

This shill again. No having 1000 inhabitants per sq kilometer isnt a good thing. The world needs de population to put less pressure on the ressources nd increase the general living standards.

Based

Then let's start with the most densely populated regions. Namely Europe and South Asia.

Yes. Its an absolute priority, first countries like indonesia,india then africa.

Just