Is Vitalik Jew?

Is Vitalik Jew?

Attached: 4Aw0tJi.jpg (1200x900, 143K)

no, he's just not a closeted pedo scared to bring up topics which pedos love to shut down because they might accidently incriminate themselves by talking about it.

he was making an argument against heroin, not in favor of child porn. he was attempting to expose a flaw in the argument that people doing heroin is harmless.

sub-150 IQ retards couldn't see the logical structure in what he is saying (or in what anyone is saying) and do their usual thing where they vaguely intuit some conclusion about what he's saying, in this case that he is "defending child porn", based on seeing a small part of the language used in isolation ("simple possession") to guess that he is "trying to color it to not be dangerous".

This. It's literally an IQ test. But also Vitalik should've seen people wouldn't get it and not say it at all instead of removing it AFTER he already said it which makes it look even worse.

His argument is flawed. All my heroin comes from poppies in my backyard picked by child slaves

It's a stupid fucking argument though. One of those things is illegal because for it to exist someone has to be harmed. The other one causes harm to people because it is illegal. Granted you could argue nothing would change about gangs and how heroin is produced just because of legalization by looking at what happens in chocolate production. (Actual child slavery happening right now in Cadbury owned plantations) but who wants to be the fucking buzzkill who makes chocolate illegal? Plus nobody eats a fucking chocolate bar and says, "Oh geeze I sure hope they didn't put fentanyl in this one". Because it's fucking legal and also fentanyl doesn't taste like chocolate and that would make no sense.

His father actually is, no joke.

may I suggest that you go back to r/ethtrader?

it's fedora poster "muh degeneracy" episode

Attached: fedora.png (200x200, 72K)

It's a fucking retarded argument though coming from a pretentious weaponised autist. The possession of child porn inherently creates a demand for the creation of child porn - if millions of people are buying and downloading it then that means more children will be harmed by the continued production of it, so there's no way that possession can occur without any harm to anyone as possession is not something which happens in a vacuum without being part of a cycle of supply and demand.

Tl;dr shut the fuck up and focus on scaling eth

You two think you're smarter than you are. The true "above 150 IQ" move would have been not to reference child pornography at all, regardless of how you can twist the logic to make it seem "smart". It was totally inappropriate for the head of a company like ethereum to conduct himself like that in a public forum. You retards are so eager for a way to validate your own self-perceived "intelligence" to yourselves you latch on to the "smart guy's" objectively stupid move and try to rationalize it to make it seem like its something only smart people could understand.

This

not the guy you're replying to, but possession of child pornography does not inherently create a demand for child porn. Simple possession could be everyone having the same 1 tape or picture. Simple possession is not active consumption of the product, whereas with heroin use, each person using needs a different product.

>The true "above 150 IQ" move would have been not to reference child pornography at all
he has autism and he was young. I shouldn't have to explain that to you but apparently it's necessary
>head of a company like ethereum
pic related could troll you for a million years

Attached: Vinay Gupta.jpg (261x193, 6K)

young, autistic, or not, I'm not the one touting his stupid move like its an expression of great intelligence.

do they do cp too ? if not your counterargument is invalid

no one said it was an expression of intelligence. it was said that it takes intelligence to not misunderstand it, which is true.

it taking intelligence to not misunderstand it, combined with him being a young autist, is why he failed to foresee the reaction it would get. he spoke without adequately anticipating how a normal mind would perceive what he wrote.

I have explained it more than adequately for you now, so if you insist on disagreeing more, I assume you are arguing in bad faith.

Attached: 1510524001535.gif (280x280, 2.89M)

When you say something needs an IQ of 150 to see its logical structure, you're implying its an expression of intelligence. You can flip that statement and give it a negative definition instead >intellegince to NOT misunderstand it
but thats just shifting the goal posts to keep you in the right. Obviously he spoke without adequately anticipating how a others would perceive what he wrote... and thats the same thing that happens when someone makes a stupid move. It doesn't really need any rationalization

Even if heroin was legal, people wouldn't all of a sudden switch over to pharma grade junk in a medical setting. They would also continue to drive and operate heavy machinery on it.

It's an intellectual though experiment, don't be retarded.

He is autistic, it's hard for high functioning autists to understand normies aren't as rational as they are.

MAYBE

Attached: vitalikniggers.png (1628x1570, 730K)

>When you say something needs an IQ of 150 to see its logical structure, you're implying its an expression of intelligence. You can flip that statement and give it a negative definition instead >intellegince to NOT misunderstand it but thats just shifting the goal posts to keep you in the right

I was differentiating between the claim that "what he said requires 150 IQ to say" and "what he said requires 150 IQ to understand". You said I said the former in a previous post, which I did not. I technically didn't even say the latter but I won't split hairs on that and will just let that stand as a perceived statement in your mind because the meaning of what I said is approximate enough anyway.

>but thats just shifting the goal posts to keep you in the right.
You just misunderstood because you're not reading literally.

Note: I'm not saying he is sub-150iq just because I say I didn't say he is 150iq+ due to the statement he made.

>obviously he spoke without adequately anticipating how a others would perceive what he wrote... and thats the same thing that happens when someone makes a stupid move. It doesn't really need any rationalization
Well yes. A question for you: Are otherwise extremely intelligent people not extremely intelligent if they have a cognitive blindspot / lacking that makes them perform even worse than the average person in a specific type of task?

Attached: 1542536725499.jpg (750x1200, 203K)

if downloading movies illegally hurts the movie industry wouldn't downloading cp illegally hurt the cp industry?

Attached: 546456.jpg (528x352, 22K)

Being an immigrant from Russia, I say probably.

This.
>negative connotation
>INTERCHANGEABLE NEGATIVE CONNOTATION NOUN BAD
>ORANGE MAN BAD
>INITIATE VOICING OUTRAGE
>INITIATE ANGRY FACIAL EXPRESSION
gawd can somebody please just come up with a super germ already.

Attached: 6b5.png (1006x813, 73K)

He sure looks like he is from one of those camps

Vitalik was formed in the cauldron of Libertarianism. That shit does a horrible death. The scientific realists got redpilled on race and the JQ and went far-right. All that is left in the nominal libertarian movement is SJWs carrying water for globohomo.

This nigga. kek *downloads cp* omg I'm helping

>simple possession of cp
>simple
what did he mean by this?

So here's a thing:
Most people aren't 150+ IQ

Anyone who IS 150+ IQ would know how to talk to idiots in a way they would understand

I think he was implying that producing it is imposes risks on others

>Anyone who IS 150+ IQ would know how to talk to idiots in a way they would understand
false and also irrelevant to the proposition you are addressing if true, since it made no claim about the intelligence required to produce the statement, only interpret it.

>Anyone who IS 150+ IQ would know how to talk to idiots in a way they would understand
Your conception of "smart person mind" is almost as simplistic and infantile as hollywood's.

No people with high iq can't understand how lower iq people think.

He's not jew or pedo. He was just trying to apply logic to laws on twitter

lubin is definately a jew, vitaliks mom maybe a jew who knows. He ACTS like a fucking jew and has been shitting on his investors all year while his shitfuck eth collapsed. Nuff said, hes gotta go

C'mon shithead, you should be FUDing ETH on reddit and twitter, not on Jow Forums.

WRONG. thinking about it like this. We think like a computer. High IQ people have more 0s and 1s to work with. Low IQ have less 0s and 1s to work with. This means that the world of a low IQ person is more 0 and 1, good or bad, while the world of a high IQ person understands how good appearing things can also be bad, and bad appearing things can also be good, so there are less absolutes and more of a network of systems for which good or bad depends on the overall goal and situation in relationship to the system, but high IQ people still think in 0 and 1, just more of a grey area, but still duality. So intelligent people can understand how dumb people think in their simple duality world, the problem is dumb people aren't thinking 3 dimensionally yet. I have reached 4 dimensional sometimes 5, not due what 6 is like yet

If you have to ask, then yes