>the greatest empires well ruled by dictators/totalitarian states
>julius ceasar and all previous Roman emperors
>Genghis Khan
>Alexander the Great
>Persian empire fags
>Qing Dynasty
Why havent you taken the feudilism pill yet user? capitalism is inherently flawed. pic related. this is what happens when you let the democracy (average IQ) choose what happens with the country instead of a single leader with 150 IQ.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>julius ceasar
>and all previous Roman emperors
>the feudalism pill
user this ends now
ah fug. meant to say all proceeding but got word jumbled in my head while i was typing lel.
also to add to the OP, obviously this doesnt work if your dictator is below average IQ (see nigger countries).
Fuck democracy and fuck authoritarianism also. Cryptoanarchocapitalist future or bust! Pumped the fuck up for the fight.
Notice how OP doesn't move to a dictatorship.
i would if there were any decent ones.
> advocating for a system of government he freely admits has no extant examples of decency.
en.m.wikipedia.org
Dis iiz da wae
There's no longer a reliable way to select a good dictator. Usually the best examples emerged out of military or civil conflicts where their leadership skills and judgement allowed them to rise to power. Modern military and states are too complex for it to happen now. Democratic governments are also rotting, patriotism and nationalism use to keep them in check to some degree, modern politicians have little interest in their states and they're wealthy enough to move elsewhere if things get too bad.
>Qing dynasty
>good
lmao
preceding brainlet
This is a business and finance board sir
Merchant republics only
>muh big empires
Yeah and how long did they last?
>Republic of Venice
>Founded: 697 AD
>Dissolved: 1797AD
The true 1000 year Reich
Who says we haven't? Neo-monarchist City states when?
i don't disagree. sigh
>Persian empire
Abolishing slavery and freedom of religion
user, you don't base youre point of view towards history on Hollywood right.....right?
damn you are a retard
>the greatest empires well ruled by dictators/totalitarian states
>i would (move to a dictatorship) if there were any decent ones
the jews killed them all with bombs and goy cannon fodder and then installed (((liberal democracy))).
>be dictator
>enslave literally everyone
yeah, no shit you'll have a great empire but at what price
>He thinks he's free under democracy
Who is gaddafi
>Why havent you taken the feudilism pill yet user?
Because I come from a peasant family, so I'll be royally fucked anyway. Also desu feudalism never went away, it is in fact, an old form of capitalism. It just got some nicer colors and better looking clothes than it did in the dark ages.
Your pic related runs directly counter to your love of giant empires, dumbass.
Ignoring the capitalism is inherently flawed statement which is a separate issue. Dictatorships and Monarchies are preferable to democracies because of their time preference.
Two scenarios:
>Given a house to own indefinitely
>Rent paid in a house for 4 years
Which would be better looked after after a period of time?
>Rent paid in a house for 4 years
Probably better stated as, given a house to live in for four years only.
And they all fucking failed. Congrats you’re an asshat
People don't think about this the right way in light of our modern predicament. Monarchy isn't about having a great king, it's about NOT being ruled by corporations, media, and left-wing activists in academia. The actual democratic process is a scam, the King could just do "responsive authoritarianism" if he wanted to.