I'm all in LINK but I'm nervous. The team can't fucking spell. That's like the most basic thing...

I'm all in LINK but I'm nervous. The team can't fucking spell. That's like the most basic thing. Imagine you're meeting a lawyer to go over an important business deal, and he shows up in a perfectly tailored suit but he has white gym socks and beat up, old shoes on. Would you trust that guy with a huge deal? I wouldn't. I'm getting $5k soon and might put more into link but this fud unironically gets to me. Help.
>t. 40k linklet

Attached: 1543931829265.png (340x278, 135K)

There's no excuse. The website release was super shabby. Even if your copy writer has dyslexia just get one other person to read over it. Or hell, preview it on Jow Forums, we'll go over it with a fine toothed comb for free.

Attached: 1530633478352.jpg (736x1211, 667K)

What do you think they did? They know they have a team of fucking retards on biz who will dissect everything they do, instantly. You are the copy writer, and you did it free.

I'm sure they just collected and aggregated our revisions

Agreed. There's a free tool called fucking spell check too. Maybe use it before printing or publishing something. How the fuck can we trust this team to actually produce a working main net when they literally (LITERALLY) can't spell fucking decentralization. What the fuck

Don't fall for the 'boomer aesthetic as direct representation of competence' meme. It's something to note, but it's not predictive. There are 'professionals' in every line of work who take great care to present themselves well specifically because that's the only skill they have.

Attention to detail is important if I'm investing money though. I wouldn't expect Warren Buffet to send a yearly letter to shareholders with spelling errors. And this is worse because it's basic, promotional stuff. They can't even get a 50 word poster out without a fucking gaffe

dont forget partnering with Etha, and confido.

>when the fud comes down to spelling mistakes

Why can't they take 30 sec and spell check stuff?

I guess grammarly.com is too centralized for their liking

Attached: sergeyAdelyn.png (1758x1082, 1.61M)

They weren’t incorrect spellings though: contact instead of contract and decentralize instead of decentralized. No spell-check would have picked up those up as all were spelt correctly. Blame the designer and proof-reader.

you need to try out grammerly.com it is awesome

Who cared about marketing anyway it's not the team's strong suit because they literally never do it. Solving the Oracle problem makes up for being incompetent in other areas. More concerning is the service agreement. Once that's completed I will be bullish

Attached: KEK_2.png (479x567, 557K)

Sure it's understandable but you have to see how it fits with the whole picture. If you're sincerely worried, learn Go and review Steves/Alex's/Thomas'/whoever else's commits, read Mark's medium posts, watch the talks and see if the attention to detail falls short there too. Right now you're like a boomer at costco trying to get a discount over damaged packaging.

You guys don't get it. Sergey is decentralizing grammar. Us having to correct them is all according to the plan. 1000$ EOY still stands.

>I'm all in LINK but I'm nervous
more like mentally retarded. how could you fall far this shit?
>350K Linktard here

Yeah, I was phone posting, I realise the irony in making grammatical errors in a post about others making grammatical errors.

The grammatical errors almost entirely come from that eyebrowless chink they hired

naw man, i was trying to say the website can do exactly what you bought up.

It sends everything you type to their servers.

The absolute state of 2018, people are voluntarily installing keyloggers and pay money to have an online microphone constantly in their room, sending everything to google/amazon.

doesnt google already listening to you? I mean unless you go off the grid, i dont think you can avoid these things.

You mean GOOG/C_A

lol those people cant even spell what the fuck, its true

I've been a professional proofreader and copy editor for five years (though I've kind of moved on in the past couple of months). I've got a pretty impressive resume in terms of editing and proofing clients I've worked for (one of the biggest academic publishers in the world) and understand link well enough to talk about it intelligently.

Do you all think there's any chance they'd get back to me? Honestly if you're publishing anything professionally it should be a lot better than what they're doing, and it's so easy and affordable to prevent all the mistakes they make.

Attached: chainlink hilarious.jpg (680x1461, 625K)

How much do you charge? They can afford word-class specialists, so one thinks they'd afford an editor.

because it's not that easy. Proofing isn't rocket science by any means, but it is a skill that has to be developed to publish things on a professional level with a guarantee of no errors, and there is a level of consistency and error-proofness that a professional can get to that someone who just thinks they're intelligent and a good writer cannot. Most people think they can do it, but the results are usually very lackluster unless they're experienced. Every major publisher has proofreaders on staff, and if chainlink thinks they can publish stuff professionally without having one looking at their stuff (certainly on a contract basis), they're wrong.

depends on the subject, but just generic proofreading of something that doesn't need someone knowledgable on the subject and isn't editing I'd usually charge $4 a page.

I would almost want to volunteer since I'm invested, but I think they'd take it more seriously if I treated it like a regular paid job.

>invest life savings in project ran by a guy who cant spell

We’re all gonna make it.

Why could not Chainlink team check out their latest partnership announcement of ETHA Group. These are clearly fake profiles, stock photos of random black people and made up names.

Why does not Chainlink have even time to check this kind of shit out? These people do not even exist and Chainlink gladly endorses their "company" on their twitter

Attached: ETHA Remit.jpg (1392x1612, 293K)

its all adelyn's fault honestly.

Attached: file.png (400x400, 208K)

>Why does not Chainlink have even time
holy shit lol discord are using Fiverr now lmao

Incredible

Attached: 1524635058167.jpg (500x528, 67K)

This. Based.

>t. Pajeet

she's so fucking hot

Stink 0.01$ EOY

If they can't even do the simple things like spell just imagine how buggy their code is

Attached: 1525874283550.jpg (1071x561, 69K)

TOPKEK

It's not a fucking spelling bee. if the tech is god tier i'm sure big entities will look past an incorrect consonant

>"man this tech is fantastic, using this with smart contracts could really help our business save millions! such a shame they spelt that word wrong on a basic summary. gonna have to pass. "

>they missed this thing that is blatantly obvious, what other details might they have overlooked?

AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH

Attached: adelyn.jpg (1080x1417, 519K)

I agree, find her fine looking.

She looks like a Thai whore with no makeup on, absolute shit tier asian.

dont panic dude. im extremely intelligent and operating at essentially a genius level - im telling you this because i use LINK as a store of value. everything is going to be all right, just keep buying while you still can.

>chequed
Adelyn & I are corresponding via email, so I sent her that photograph along with the following message
>inb4 he didn't
You're welcome, Adelyn; thanks again right back atcha!

Before rambling on, I quickly want to point out one (technically two) particular issue(s): spelling & grammar; you'll notice two glaring errors underlined in the attached slide from the last presentation in New York.

Unfortunately but understandably, such imperfections cannot be tolerated. As another anonymous poster put it, this is like showing up to a high-pressure sales meeting wearing an expensive business suit... and white gym socks. They are minor errors, but they are errors which imply other errors.

"If this team makes spelling mistakes and uses bad grammar in their presentation slides, then I must assume that their code is also rife with errors & bugs," is what anyone noticing these (somewhat glaring) problems thinks (even though the actual programming is being done by someone else entirely). It looks bad and shakes out a significant number of otherwise potential partners & investors.

To tie this in with my current work, it's all about *presentation* -- if *every* cube of Ahi Tuna on a sixty-dollar plate is not perfectly cut, if the glaze is not drizzled properly, if the garnish flower is wilted, if the side is not properly portioned, if anything is less than *perfect*... then it is not a sixty-dollar plate; it is garbage. That shit might fly at McDonald's, but it certainly won't when there's real money on the table.

So, this is an issue which is undoubtedly hurting the project (arguably more than association with an anonymous internet forum inhabited by high-IQ INTP/INTJ/etcs who have "figured it out" and sperg to $1k eoy memes).

You're still doing an amazing job, and your team management is on-point, and we adore you, Sergey and your entire team... but you have got to get *everything* written about ChainLink *perfect* (or it just won't fly).

Maybe they can't actually deliver on their product.

Times like these make my mouth smile when I realize we poop on the same streets in Mumbai. Oh my.

That’s because it’s a coin run by about 4 recent immigrant amerimutts and a weird looking dyslexic chink.
This turd is seriously going under 10 cents

wtf seriously, pajeet tier scamtoken