BUYER BEWARE

BUYER BEWARE
QNT is a mass orchestrated p&d don't take the bait.

Attached: warning-1646872_960_720.png (819x720, 77K)

piece of shit middleware that doesnt need a token, of course im not taking the bait

Yah guyz the founder of the ISO Standard for blockchain who has worked in the EU commission, Bank of England and as chief security officer for Mastercard's Vocalink is running a company with a groundbreaking idea that ticks every box for enterprise adoption but feels that it needs an orchestrated pump and dump.

I've always wondered how so many people on Biz seem to only have a few thousand bucks in crypto even after all this time and so many opportunities. I get it now. People are just this retarded.

See you at $50.

When your main feature is (and I quote):
>Address the major limitations of current blockchain technology and unlock its true potential.

You have to be pants on head retarded to think this will ever be implemented anywhere.

The main feature is to solve the primary issue that's holding back enterprises, banks and governments from serious adoption of blockchain technology.

That's why they'll soon announce a partnership with Oracle, a project with the EU Commission and over 70+ other corporate deals.

Whadd'ya know, basement dwelling biz autists who have achieved nothing seem to disagree with successful CEOs and directors of major enterprises in terms of what's important for blockchain adoption. I'm shocked.

Did you actually write the content on the website. Your just saying 'I don't know what they do' but using a lot of words to say it.

If you can explain to me what they're doing and how the token holds value without using generic terms like 'solve the problem that's holding back enterprises' I'll market buy a big bag right now

actually laughing out loud. fudders btfo

I'll tell you exactly what they do.

Quant is creating Overledger, a blockchain OS that allows existing enterprise systems to connect to blockchains and leverage DLT technology.

However, Overledger allows direct access to multiple blockchains at the same time, with full interoperability between those blockchains.

This allows the creation of multi-chain apps (Mapps). So an app can use multiple chains simultaneously for different features. One part could use Bitcoin, another Ripple, another Ethereum, and another Corda - all within one app.

And as this isn't a blockchain, it solves one of the main worries holding enterprise adoption back: None of them want to spend millions and take huge risks to connect solely to one blockchain, as their system is then at the mercy of what happens with that one blockchain and how that one blockchain develops.

Overledger removes that concern completely. Connect the systems to Overledger, and then Overledger can connect to numerous major blockchains with more in the pipeline. Instead of a blockchain-based project being a one-size plug, Overledger gives the company a universal adapter to connect, disconnect and leverage a range of different blockchains on a whim - all without having to change their existing systems.

As for the tokenomics, QNT will be required for usage and licensing fees. But Quant is launching the Quant Treasury, so if any major enterprises don't want to buy and store crypto, the Treasury will do it on their behalf. That means they can sell licensing and usage for fiat and STILL create demand for the QNT token that will be proportional to the growth of the ecosystem. See image.

Get it now?

Attached: jnnjknbuigyvt.jpg (700x1280, 172K)

Thanks for the information but why does it need a blockchain to do this? Sounds to me like something software can easily solve (connecting applications too different or multiple blockchains). Why would I as a company even need this when I could easily throw a handful of coders on the problem? It doesn't even seem to be that complex a problem too solve. The real complexity comes from (legacy) applications that'd need to connect to whatever, they don't seem to solve this problem

Because Overledger provides an off-the-shelf solution that solves an awful lot of headaches for enterprise.

For example, if enterprises connect to multiple blockchains with interoperability via Overledger, then any blockchain updates, codes, forks or anything else are not the enterprises concern. All the enterprise has to do is connect to Overledger, and then Overledger handles everything else to create an easy universal interface.

Quant also registered a patent for their technology back in 2015, so clearly they have something they're very keen to protect.

This is where Quant are ahead of the game. All these devs in the scene have tried to create their own blockchains with a minor level of interoperability (or none at all), but enterprises don't want that. In fact, this kind of thing is making adoption more difficult because without the kind of interoperability Overledger provides, there can only really be one winner in the long run, so enterprises don't want to take the risk spending millions to tie themselves to one blockchain that may not be the same one that others use.

Put it this way: if you had a multi-billion dollar company, would you take the leap right now to pick one blockchain and commit your systems to it?

With Overledger, you wouldn't have to.