Bitcoin isn't actually byzantine fault tolerant, as consensus isn't definitive. The hashgraph is not only BFT, but is asynchronous. ABFT has literally never been implemented in a live setting, as the only way to achieve it is with those old voting algorithms which require sending many votes over the internet, making them completely impractical. Hashgraph not only sets the bar for security, but does so at incredible speeds. All that's needed to be communicated is the transactions themselves, plus two hashes, maybe 1-2% more data, and you gossip this out, which is the fastest known way to distribute information in a network. After that, latency to consensus is about 3 seconds, depending on node proximity, bandwidth, and number of nodes. Hashgraph is literally better than anything we've ever seen and are likely to see in our lifetime. People can hate on the patent and I understand that, but institutions and corporations don't necessarily subscribe to the same ideology; they want stability, governance and regulatory compliance. Hedera will be fast-tracked to an ETF and leave bitcoin in the dust.
Bitcoin isn't actually byzantine fault tolerant, as consensus isn't definitive. The hashgraph is not only BFT...
l
Too bad you can't actually do anything with it.
Bitcoin SV will win. I'm sorry, that's just the way it is.
NChain smokes these amateurs.
This board is literally retarded. Is there anyone here who can hold an intelligent conversation?
Just tell me when I can buy some of this
There is no economic system in Hashgraph. It's just a blockchain. A database. No miner competition. And you can't do anything with it.
Let me repeat: I am not shilling when I say Bitcoin SV is the ONLY crypto that will work long term. I don't care if people buy SV. But this is the reality. The original bitcoin worked. We wouldnt be in this mess with billions of dollars spent on hot garbage like Hashgraph if the original bitcoin system wasn't crippled.
Best resources to read more about it?
swirlds.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
Launches either March or April. Get ready
What can you do with this shit? You still haven't answered me nigger
Why do you think Hashgraph is safe from governmental butt fucking? Or rich hackers?
You know you can't do anything with these meme DAGs right? No real smart contracts, no real security. It's a mirage. We already went through this whole exercise with IOTA.
Right now the use case appears to be monetization of internet content. I would rather block ads or have the website mine in the background in exchange for content. They need better use cases.
I invested in the seed round.
Going to be so goddamn rich, dumping it on the fucking noobs.
Insta 45 x profit, thanks Mike Maloney for the invite.
Sure bro. Explain dero then. World changing tech and DAG. Tech is so good that they won’t show documents but I am a big believer in blind faith
>I don't care if people buy SV
>Talks about SV in a non-SV thread
There is supposedly a plan to create a real file system on top of Hashgraph. With the difference of the thing having files that are DELETABLE
Why is it good that files are deleteable? Sounds bad.
enjoy your CP
If files are deletable, and hedera requires kyc, can't any government or bank or person change my balance or records contained?
A thousand coins have had the edge on becoming bigger than Bitcoin. Some idiots cant see big picture
It's nice that you'll be able to program smart-contracts using Solidity at first. Then some other languages that will emerge. Lemony Snicket thought of everything.
True. The SV tards are the most myopic of them all.
Lots of techno jargon, better than BTC, patent, ETF hype, where do I buy this shitcoin?
The original Bitcoin is the only system that will ever work because of the economic incentives. It's unfortunate branding, but SV is all there is now that retards and glowniggers mutilated it. CP means nothing. You don't understand bitcoin if that's all you're focused on, and you're clearly a late adopter because this comes up every couple years.
>Long before the network gets anywhere near as large as that, it would be safe
for users to use Simplified Payment Verification (section 8) to check for
double spending, which only requires having the chain of block headers, or
about 12KB per day. Only people trying to create new coins would need to run
network nodes. At first, most users would run network nodes, but as the
network grows beyond a certain point, it would be left more and more to specialists with server farms of specialized hardware. A server farm would only need to have one node on the network and the rest of the LAN connects with that one node.
Bitcoin is still decentralized if there are a hundred nation-state/megacorp level mining farms across the globe. This is how it was always meant to scale, and SV are the only ones that get it.
>being this insecure about hashgraph that you spam wall-of-text diatribes in nonSV threads
Hashgraph consensus algo explained for tards:
>youtube.com
>CP means nothing
lel
>glowniggers
Oh, your one of those pol schizophrenics. Will treat you accordingly.
I don't give a shit about Hashgraph. I thought someone would be willing to debate instead of posting YouTube links
How can this scale beyond hostile nation states and irrational actors who want to watch the world burn?
So why do you post SV bullshit in a hashgraph thread?
Also, wall of text isn't discussion. It's a knee-jerk reaction.
Go read the first word of OPs post
It doesn't address SV to any degree. Like it or not, SV is just an alt now, and whenever anyone refers to bitcoin, they mean corecoin.
Easily. Bitcoin is literally the safest database on the planet. Even a full-scale nuclear war will not destroy it.
No, because Core broke the economic incentive system. It would be more confusing if I just said bitcoin. SV is the only one that scales.
But what about Hashgraph?
the "muh CP" paradigm: nobody who complains about CP on the blockchain is technically inclined enough to access blockchain data directly, leaving the centralized frontends they use ample room to censor the horrific content they will never see
hey mouthbreathers, perhaps try to focus on stopping actual pedophilia commited every day by certain demographics, rather than images you will never see on technology you don't understand
>nobody who complains about CP on the blockchain is technically inclined enough to access blockchain data directly
>only the people complaining about CP will be prosecuted
pure delusion
Who gives a shit about your skew on the history of crypto and ideological infights.
In public discourse, the word 'bitcoin' means either 'corecoin' or 'the crypto establishment'
Also, if you disagree your against the decentralization of language. Words mean the things the social consensus imbues the word with, not what you want it to mean.
All is good an well, I actually don't really care about "muh patent muh centralized" as long as it makes me money ... But anons, this shit won't make any money except for the 1st round investors who bought under 0.001 USD (second round last year was 0.12USD, so those who got in at that price will be the first ones to get rekt).
Grab it when it goes under 0.001 USD anons, and not before or making it will be a dream far gone ...