Why don’t liberals like data and statistical analysis?

>hillary wins by 1284%

Attached: Nate-Silver.jpg (300x300, 15K)

They genuinely believe that they can change the natural world by mere declaration; that if they insist a thing is true, and force others to say so as well, that this thing then becomes true. They suffer from a specific type of psychosis know as Magical Thinking. As usual, this stems from underlying narcissism leading to Delusions of Grandeur.

Attached: IMG_20171125_154824.jpg (346x523, 43K)

The Bell Curve straight up says that the "cognitive elite" are the most intelligent people regardless of things like gender, race, etc. who should rise to the top of society. It's literally the opposite of the allegedly racist stuff everyone seems to think it is.
It's still bullshit since there are so many shut ins, serial killers, etc. with high IQs like Edmund Kemper who can never be accepted by society.

fee fee fuuu fuuu

lol get a load of this goy

got 'em

Because leftists are spooked af.

Attached: 1522478964128.jpg (811x1674, 235K)

Ironically Nate was the only one who pointed out Trump had like a 1/3 shot at winning (according to 538 analysis).

But he gets dumped on here for saying she'd win. Actually their whole deal is (usually) pretty redpilled on statistics and lying using statistics.

Attached: Glow In The Dark CIA Improved.png (999x864, 545K)

They're obviously going to call it racist since it says the mean IQ is different for different races.

It's amazing how liberals think that if there were no white people, that all the muds and niggers would be co-existing peacefully on Mars by now.

Attached: nigger-army-beating-lynching-violent-attack-savage.gif (320x240, 2.36M)

They love (((data))), but not facts.

2012 Data - Facebook - Obama
archive.is/ZfMWy
archive.is/grlwo
archive.is/mpPkw
archive.is/rwLMI
archive.is/L5ZmZ
archive.is/qiQp9
archive.is/korgP
archive.is/BOXog
archive.is/mUhLn
archive.is/kTwCR
archive.is/7ec9j
archive.is/qx1BW
archive.is/zurel
archive.is/fFR1x
archive.is/mJEv5
archive.is/COMyt
archive.is/7Fp1i
archive.is/CqhxJ
archive.is/5nJle
archive.is/D5m9b

2018
archive.is/sdC6B
archive.is/Q0axY

Soros
archive.is/UJqBQ

>be me
>take sociology class
>professor talks about bell curve
>"woah, he's redpilled"
>calls the book racist trash and is based on pseudoscience
why is Jow Forums always right

Blacks are racist as fuck (see Rwandan Genocide). Also, I like how white champagne liberals (chicks, mainly) think that the various victim groups hang out. They don't hang out. Spics fucking hate niggers and vice versa (if you ever call a hispanic woman 'black', watch out), they both hate gays and don't even say the word tranny in front of them. These groups aren't friends.

They do when it suits their purpose, e.g. wage gap, but even there they need to omit key facts and data points to fit their agenda

This was from tonight. She was defending this cunt.

Attached: aaaaaa.png (563x551, 89K)

Jesus... this bitch needs to be chased in the streets.

>bell curve
is that how stupid people describe a gaussian distribution?

>journalist tweets about bus crash monies raised because the boys who died were white
>gets crucified on twitter all day
>dindu and other lefties come to her rescue

Attached: 54645775.jpg (384x300, 60K)

Edmund Kemper was a product of a dysfunctional household that essentially made him into the killer he was. Had he always had the capacity to kill? Yes, but under different circumstances Ed would've been a relatively normal member of society. He would've been one damn fine soldier or police officer.

its a book, retard

Nah, the real chance of Trump winning is 50%, he either wins or he doesn't :^)

Almost every single (((sociology))) educator falls into that same line of thinking. One exception is Linda Gottfredson. Article is readily findable based on title if you'd like to see the images, but they honestly don't add much.
archive.is/C9gdx

>[[[Data and statistical analysis]]]

>lol those dumb creationists think biology and evolution arn't real
>ALL THE BIOLOGICAL DATA RELATED TO GENETIC DIFFERENCES IN HUMANS IS FAKE NEWS

Because it empirically proves that niggers and spics are inferior to white people by every metric

Because data ruins the illusion that non-whites aren't pieces of garbage.

>HATE FACTS!!!
Leftist want to live in blissful multicultural virtue signaling ignorance.

FPBP

How can leftists claim Stirner's philosophy is compatible to theirs?

He’s our guy though

It's always the over educated upper middle class people who hold these opinions

This

Most political minded people dont like math. This includes most conservatives as well.

Hopefully they continue sharing them.

>vox

I feel dirty just reading their headlines.

Attached: vox faggot.png (1261x709, 658K)

>Why don't delusional people like reality?

Attached: 1458342947202.jpg (641x667, 56K)

the bell curve is literally "Correlation is the same as causation, right?" the book

I like racist canadians more than I like liberal canadians.

t. non-white canadian

Fpbp

that's not how it works :D

because things like data and numbers go against the liberal mindset of "hurr de hurr we smartest everyone else not us dumb lololol"

Have you read it? I think you should read it and rethink what you've said.

Cat-eye glasses are my fetish and it kills me inside to see them associated with feminazis when they don't even wear them.

It's always cat-eyes in the comics, but irl it's the same chunky plastic rectangles their soyish (((male))) equivalents wear.

Attached: 3a8b7198894d8f8e85a65bc940bda5a4.jpg (497x500, 49K)

Liberals are obsessed with identifying bias. Statistics are a prime target because the method, sample size, context, and mode of presentation can be manipulated.

Pretend someone shows you statistics of forests with the most piles of garbage. What you don't know is that they only took 20 steps into each forest, they ignored several forests, they didn't include the ratio of forest per garbage, and that they have an agenda to prove that forests are full of garbage. All you see are the statistics presented in a comfy infographic.

Besides, liberals love statistics. They use them all the time. They just don't like the ones you're fond of.

Attached: ourguys.png (747x795, 445K)

but what about intersectionality?

everyone's generally a cunt to each other

She is a very obvious kike. An absolute spiteful parasite, undeserving of the hard-earned spoils of white men.

Attached: lena-dunham-ugly-hunchback-defective-jew.jpg (2400x3000, 937K)

They want reality to conform to their emotions, and they aren't alone. Plenty of rightwing people like that too.

Any shill championing "white - anything is bad" should get inundated with the never-ending deluge of niggers being niggers to other niggers. Make it un-deniable.

People can say that Jow Forums or facebook makes people "racist". Really, it's reality sites and worldstarhiphop where you can see how niggers act worldwide and square it with your own first-hand experiences with these fucking savages and parasites.

Attached: nigger-mob-kills-another-nigger-with-motorcycles-savages.webm (640x360, 2.9M)

This

This. There are open air nig slave markets in Libya as we speak.

>tfw math and stats major.
Breddy gud.

Libya is a shit example. Libya's government barely exists right now.
Mauritania, though-- They've been one of the most heavily slave-dependent nations in the world since they were a nation.
Of course, Uzbekistan is the same way.

because in their mind, feels are more valid than reals.