100 Reasons Why (((Evolution))) Is Stupid

Attached: Image131.gif (320x240, 15K)

Attached: 379284fec6be3df2202ff994d548f999.jpg (480x360, 29K)

Attached: religionbrains.png (470x960, 1.31M)

Attached: download.jpg (327x154, 9K)

Attached: FB_IMG_1514680173091.jpg (480x650, 33K)

Attached: %5C_Six_Types_of_'Evolution'%5C__by_Dr._Kent_Hovind.png (1148x864, 1.09M)

Attached: 20180626_103759.jpg (2048x1843, 1.16M)

Attached: Screenshot_20180603-035349_YouTube.jpg (2220x1080, 544K)

Attached: Screenshot_20180603-035439_YouTube.jpg (2220x1080, 590K)

Attached: FB_IMG_1513758700835.jpg (720x720, 36K)

Attached: Screenshot_20171213-144943.png (720x1280, 342K)

Attached: 1528489960039.jpg (1049x2048, 408K)

Attached: christ.png (900x3186, 759K)

*heavy breathing*

Excellent thread OP!

Thanks for the bump brother! Was discouraged

Bump

Micro-evolution implies Macro-evolution over a big enough time frame. The only reason Christians deny evolution is because they autistically think the Earth is 6000 years old.

!

Attached: PhotoGrid_1530155920046.jpg (2048x2048, 658K)

Yet no evolutionist will even attempt to present their best evidence for it. Literally every example, when dusted off, is micro. Usually (((they))) will say "a plant becomes reistant to frost!"....well you started with a plant and ended with a plant. You started with x and ended with x. "But with enough time"(fairytale coming), rocks and rain can produce single-celled organisms. Then they find a wife. Then they become pineapples and persons.

Attached: din.jpg (600x600, 30K)

One of the things that always gets me.
> magical skyman says poof and makes life.
Lol stupid theist!
> magical puddle of goo gets struck by lightning thus spawning all the millions of variations of life.
Totally 4realz.

I always wondered about snakes...but they do...idk about this one.

Attached: Sfdmm6x.jpg (257x196, 9K)

Check'd

Snakes are flexible.

Attached: main-qimg-82ed1f8b30040991cd3ad9849e70577b-c[1].jpg (602x401, 42K)

Whoa

Literally everything you posted is retarded. and you know carbon dating is like 1 of 100s of radiodating things right?

Shut up ape boy.

Attached: evolution is the solution.jpg (1019x719, 68K)

Watch the video then. But for the record you're calling not just me out, but Zoologists, Geologists, etc...

Pic related. Notice a gap....30,000 to 100,000...

Attached: what-are-the-different-types-of-carbon-dating.gif (398x247, 37K)

Yeah that’s such an obvious hoax that it undermines everything else in this thread.

>imagine being this retarded
if evolution is not real how do you explain niggers ?
did god just create a sub-human race just to fuck with us ?

L-Lewd!

It's a Jow Forums schizo. Claims to be Christians, but makes jokes about dead children.

Kys

Attached: 1529578264662.png (857x1119, 752K)

Eerily happening, yes or no. Protocols of Zion may be fake, 3 World wars may be fake(though idk what your basis is, beside the point), but you can't keep dismissing and dismissing the occult. It is not under a lamp for a reason.

Attached: Theodor-Herzl.jpg (244x207, 14K)

Im an archeologist, its funny we don't really trust carbon dating we just use it as a general idea. Its not acurrate at all.

To disprove evolution, you only need to find a dinosaur bone that's 2 million years old. If you have an alternative theory, present evidence. If not, you are just debating like a dishonest jewish marxist critical theorist

Math:
1 you
2 parents
4 grandparents
8
16
32
64
128
256
------200-300 years ago you had 256 grandparent family lines. Continue this math(known as geometric sequence), and just 3000 years ago we are at 16 quintillion. 16 with 4 sets of 000 behind it. At this point we are inbreeding with xth cousins. As the Bible says: all nations are of one blood.

Order from chaos actually makes sens though, if you understand the nature of chaos. Chaos is possibility, endless possibility. A monkey with a typewriter, randomly typing for all of eternity, will eventually produce poetry. Chaos can give rise to anything, including it's own end.

Life from non life is much the same as that. Apply what I just told you about chaos to the elemental table. The chaos of superheated atoms coming together to make dna.

2 and 3 are fine, 1 and 4 are bollocks though

>T.Christian

Dinosaurs are for kids. They just put random bones together. Those retarded T-rex arms are a way to mock you brainlets.

Are you saved brother? If not, i mean do these images resonate with you as a man of science?

Well we need to analyze the ruler.

There's nothing wrong with being Christian and understanding evolution. Only American Protestards think God would send people to hell for appreciating science.

Attached: 2 int.png (188x264, 77K)

God declared to Cain, "Now you are under a curse and driven from the ground, which opened its mouth to receive your brother's blood from your hand. When you work the ground, it will no longer yield its crops for you. You will be a restless wanderer on the earth" (Genesis 4:11-12).

>A monkey with a typewriter, randomly typing for all of eternity, will eventually produce poetry. Chaos can give rise to anything, including it's own end.
Typewriters are ordered. Monkeys are ordered. You're describing order creating chaos creating order.

Biggest problem with the Miller-Urey experiment(the only one of its kind), was that of the 4 beginning elements used to mimic a pre-atmospheric Earth, they used ammonia gas. Pre-atmospheric earth has no ozone, ozone stops UV rays, UV rays destroy ammonia gas. The second problem is that the experiment resulted in a few amino acids in a puddle of toxic tar and byproduct. Assuming this is in the ocean, not only do those aminos need to escape this solution, but they need to endured the ocean of h20 that would never allow these "left-handed" and "right-handed" aminos to bond. The 3rd issue is that these aminos are like dropping a pile of sticks and forming not just a few letters, or even sentences, but a small novel.

Watch the video?

Evolution is a mechanism created by God. If you lie and shill against evolution, you are lying and shilling against the Lord Jesus Christ.

> will eventually
No, there's 0 certainty in any chaos theory. Could possibly, sure. But, never Will. He'll the monkey could just hit "A" the whose time.

Exodus 20:11King James Version (KJV)

11For in six days theLordmade heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore theLordblessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

John 1King James Version (KJV)

1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2The same was in the beginning with God.
3All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

Genesis 1King James Version (KJV)

1In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

"Where did God come from?"
youtu.be/w6AHcv19NIc

What about carbon-14? It works for less than 70000 yeears old fossils

Attached: PhotoGrid_1530369067475.jpg (2048x2048, 1.38M)

I already have a master's degree in genetics. I'm not going to watch your dumb propaganda video, protestant.

IFB, not protestant. Genetics indicate we have a common ancestor 6000 years ago. Do I get a higher degree because I can tell you what her and her husband's names were?

>IFB, not protestant
>not protestant

Attached: 1528862319147.jpg (258x245, 12K)

>master's degree
Go away freemason

youtube.com/watch?v=TrEqATvtGHA

Christianity is great but Catholicism is not.

>not protestant
>king james only

Micro becomes Macro over time you braindead retard.
It's called deductive reasoning, and it's a lot more convincing than the Bible.God exists but you disgrace God by claiming a shit book like the Bible represents his will.

youtu.be/ijDFKHxJfTc
Well that pidgeonholes the entire religion into 2 camps... here is an IFB Pastor exposing Martin Luther's 95 heresies...

Deductive reasoning is a copout when we've called all the dating methods into question. Not to mention it's really quite simple: say you have absolutely 0 proof of macroevolution and we will reach a common ground. Just stop telling people you have it.

Go back to worshipping your German queen

checked.

Wait what

God save us from fundie retards, and if He won't then maybe the Devil will.
>fundamentally misunderstand the nature of evolution
>ignite own strawman to claim victory
Evolution is neither difficult to grasp nor is it anti-God. A near-apocalyptic event occurs to a species, eliminating diversity and forcing conformity of genetics in the survivors with a distinct focus on those genetic traits that ensured this survival. It's why our mitochondrial DNA has a mere seven variants: that's how close humans came to snuffing it entirely.

Attached: 1530139126230.jpg (1920x1080, 169K)

You forgot this one, I always laugh when atheist co-workers bring this up

>bro, we live in a hologram universe bro
>bro it's like the MATRIX BRO
>bro some hyper intelligent beings put us in a MATRIX bro
>"you mean you believe someone greater than us created the universe we live in?"
>YEAH BRO

Attached: 1320713039893.jpg (526x300, 52K)

This. The christfag poster needs to go back to 8th grade biology and stop posting shitty arguments that have been debunked.

>eliminating diversity and forcing conformity of genetics in the survivors with a distinct focus on those genetic traits that ensured this survival
That would mean that incest would create healthy babies.

Low IQ thread

If it's any consolation, the vast majority of edgy atheists do not understand evolution either.

Where you are going wrong m8 is that the word has drifted in usage to mean "progress to something better" and this misinterpretation is quite apparent in the goddawful slave mentality of transhumanism. Lunatics lining up for their control chips claiming it is the next step in evolution simply do not understand that evolution doesn't have steps, it only has survivors.

Attached: 1529431212573.gif (630x346, 1.62M)

Smug.

Attached: 1513024640699.png (1782x701, 225K)

I’m dismissing the letter, not the occult.

As much as people like to claim that evolution is a scientific process, it is ultimately a faith-based belief. It is unscientific because it is inherently unfalsifiable. Also, as you correctly noted, evolution completely fails to answer the most important question: the origin of the universe and of life in particular. It's one thing to argue that a man could evolve from a monkey. It's another thing entirely to argue that a monkey could evolve from a rock. Most evolutionists (that is, people who "believe" in evolution) are scientifically illiterate, and take the theory literally on faith. Many others, even with science backgrounds, mostly accept it based on peer pressure or simply take it for granted as being true without ever really diving into the details or asking the most serious and difficult questions.

There's a tremendous arrogance that goes along with the assumption that because mankind has achieved a high degree of scientific knowledge we have a complete understanding of the universe. When you actually consider what science is - namely, the observation and testing of the physical universe through theories and hypotheses in order to deduce natural law - it becomes obvious that by definition our science is limited. All we can do isobserve and theorizebased on existing laws. We didn't write the laws. Mankind did not invent physics, chemistry, biology, gravity or electromagnetism. We discovered these things based on the inherent order of the universe. Our understanding is akin to that of a man in a pitch black room, stumbling around feeling at the furniture and trying to form a mental picture of his surroundings without actually being able to see anything.

The incredible, mind-boggling complexity and absoluteeleganceof the physical universe is apparent even with shallow study. Frankly, I find it incomprehensible that any educated man can deny the existence of a creative force behind the universe after gaining a solid grasp of mathematics and science. It is truly a blindness born out of arrogance. There is no other explanation. The fingerprints of a great designer all ever-present and ubiquitous. The idea that this incredibly complex designexploded randomly out of nothinginto existence (literally what atheists/evolutionists believe) is an infinitely more preposterous explanation than that the universe was simply created by someone or something far beyond our comprehension (God).

I know how ugly you are. Please get some sunlight.

Kek. I think I look ok...

Attached: 0.jpg (480x360, 16K)

Attached: Screenshot_20180701-004214_Gallery.jpg (1080x2220, 697K)

That's my point. If it was simply about surviving, then people would be able to have healthy children with their immediate family.

No that's my point m8. you're not parsing it. Take the blight of spinal bifoda as an example: a feared disease in our current diverse era. Sufferers cannot function well, have reduced lifespans, and their lungs fill with mucous making breathing in and out painful and barely-productive.

Yet if the Earth's atmosphere thickened to a soup-like smog in a global catastrophe, only humans with SB could breathe, their once-cursed biology now suited to filtering the pollution. They would be the only humans left to breed, and if their kids didn't manifest spinal bifoda, they'd die. Does this make SB any less of a blight in other ways? Nope. But the survivors can continue onwards, and that's all that evolution cares about. Humanity evolves in response to the smog planet, and SB is our saviour, our new normal.
It's not smug when you're right, m8? There's an apocalyptic evolution event in the bible. What was God doing sending a flood and sparing Noah? As far as fundies are concerned, all life on earth was reset and continued from the genetics of the folks and animals on that big boat. Evolution isn't anti-God; that poisonous idea was used to shift books writen by edgy atheists.

Attached: 1530089765522.jpg (537x418, 66K)

The catastrophic event explains the change in atmosphere. Giant insects preserved in amber cannot fly based on math. Our atmosphere was different. The brontosaurus had nostrils the size of a modern day horses' nostrils. Something was different. It also explains grand canyon, where the IFB Pastor from OP drops a wealth of knowledge on inconsistencies within Old Earth using polystrata fossils(a single tree standing through supposed millions of years of strata), the elevatiom changes at the entrance vs exit of the colorado river, and the inconsistencies of finding human bones beneath or alongsise dinosaurs. There is ever one famous story of a vandalized human-dinosaur footprint.

The powers and principalities of iniquity are hard at work to remove the foundation of the Bible: Genesis. Because if the foundation of the Bible is not literal, who's to say the rest is literal? This is much more insidious than light-hearted banter about who's dumber. Remember Bolshevism and Holodomor.

youtu.be/2h2-2lvjC8E

You're ignoring the point. If evolution is simply about the survival of genes being passed on, then why can't humans create healthy babies from incest?

Psalm 11:3King James Version (KJV)

3If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?

Attached: lazar-kaganovich-mother-russia-is-cast-down.jpg (534x307, 85K)

cute

Thanks.

Where is the near apocalyptic event in that scenario? Without that, it's not comparable to evoltion at all. That's more akin to Animal Husbandry if anything, but perversely breeding for bad traits.
What are you banging on about m8? We don't know the nature of the catastrophe that will trigger the next evolution in humans. It's not a linear, predictive process. We can only work backwards, or speculate wildly like in that SB example. The last evolutionary event left humans with a mere seven women to proceed onwards and upwards to today. That's shit-yourself levels of nearly dead forever, yet here we all are, all eight billion of us. That's proper Grace of God stuff, right there. There's no reason at all why you can't declare evolution to be His Will, albeit that does seem to suggest he's a bit of a capricious cunt, but hey, if I was God would I be any less so?

Attached: 1528697314352.gif (500x282, 1.23M)

The "doorknobs" are probably concretions. Nothing unusual here.

"Malachite man" was probably recent human burial in dinosaur rich dirt. If you buried a person in the Australia where the ground has rocks billions of years old, you wouldn't say people are billions of years old, right?

As for the seal, just use Google:
"

Both samples come from instances where "dead carbon" has been incorporated by the seal. This is known as the "reservoir effect." In essence, Antarctica sea water has significantly lower carbon-14 content than the rest of the worlds oceans. Old carbon dioxide is present within deep ocean water

Scientists know about this problem, and understand the limitations of testing. These limitations affect the samples tested, and not the carbon-dating process. There is nothing wrong with the process"

For the mammoth the original paper says the mammoth samples were in soil rich with organic matter. Probably the carbon of the organic matter seeped into the mammoth of the thousands of years.

Google result shows:

"First, the information on mammoth dates is presented in a table. This means that the direct quote given in Across the Fruited Plain is a pure fabrication. No part of the article goes “one part of the Vollosovitch mammoth…”, it’s all a table.

Secondly, none of the radiocarbon dates for mammoths given in that table are 44,000 or 29,500.

So not only is the quote a fabrication but the information contained in it is too.

“One part of Dima [a baby frozen mammoth] was 40,000, another part was 26,000 and the ‘wood immediately around the carcass’ was 9-10,000.” Troy L. Pewe, Quaternary Stratigraphic Nomenclature in Unglaciated Central Alaska, Geological Survey Professional Paper 862 (U.S. Gov. printing ofice, 1975) p. 30
"

Attached: 1530110560937.jpg (800x666, 81K)

continuing:

Same paper (slightly different citation) same flaws: There is no direct quote saying that in the article and the dates themselves aren’t in the table either.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, Dima wasn’t found until 1977 – two years after the citation was published.

The direct quote is a invented, the figures are false and the mammoth itself wasn’t even found when the source was published. How wrong can a single sentence be?

Attached: 1519823501312.jpg (2792x2000, 1.02M)

Eating

Attached: download (1).jpg (259x195, 17K)

Flaws in your reasoning:

-Genetic defects weren't a problem when the genome was fresh. Adam and Eve and their children were pure as far as genome.
-You automatically assume and assert macroevolution without providing 1) proof. And 2) see 1.
-You have a theory about a catastrophic event built upon a myriad of other false assertions. Every aspect is propped up by the last 2 points addressed, and when looked at objectively,(that is to say, without YOUR conditioning), the answer is just as sound in creation/young earth. Genetics are a creationists best friend and you are being disingenuous to imply your side gets to monopolize it.

Attached: Screenshot_20171216-160316.png (720x1280, 603K)

Buperino

Attached: 9A40BFFD-8642-4E0E-8B71-3BFABC232003.png (300x250, 82K)

>malachite man was probably buried recently

54 feet below the surface of the earth? Cognitive dissonance.

>doorknobs
Tip of the iceberg when talking about ancient man. Pic related

Attached: PhotoGrid_1530377509896.jpg (2048x2048, 1.82M)