I buy national geographic magazine almost every months

I hope you like Global Warming and Race Mixing shit, because thats all you get out of the media these days.

I came here to say this.

>(((national geographic)))

Much like Webster's it immediately started pumping out jew propaganda the second a kike bought the company.

Attached: merriam-webster-online-dictionary-changes-definition-of-assault-rifle-after-parkland-31999552.png (500x582, 173K)

this, I remember her being on morning edition or some other NPR program and was basically apologizing for Nat Geo being racist in the past by calling savages... well... savages and a bunch of other stuff

said she wanted to make up for it by changing the direction the magazine would go in the future to be as 'progressive' as possible

they are spreading objectively false information about population genetics in this issue and it's worth dropping it completely.

food, noun.

material consisting essentially of protein, carbohydrate, and fat used in the body of an organism to sustain growth, repair, and vital processes and to furnish energy; also: things that aren't eatable but kind of look like they are.

>natgeo thinking it can go against settled science

If that’s the case then no body should cry when the Supreme Court abolishes affirmative action.

Fucking lol
It's fun doing this shit
>borders are imaginary lines? Cool, i am crashing at your place from here on in
>a weapon is an assault rifle if it looks like one? Excellent, you'll save money buying styrofoam simulacrums of food since its also considered food

race isnt real in the way you take it to be, which still doesnt mean we are some kind of citizens of the world
thing is they present it in a very clickbaity way that appeals to liberals

racial theories of 19th century pol relies on are just as retarded as sjw stuff

>no scientific basis for the concept of race.

You can tell someone's race by their blood and bone structure. There is a higher chance of organs being rejected if they happen to be outside your race. Even blood has a higher chance of being rejected if it comes from someone outside your race. There are race based physical and psychological disorders.

But no goy, there is no scientific basis for race.

I also stopped buying National Geographic when they started pushing this disgusting propaganda last year.

differences between people are gradual, between different genetics, which are intermixed themselves
not category based distinctions,
naturally people differ in a ton of ways, genetically, culturally, religiously etc.
however its not fully predisposed in one way and you cant pull a line and say one race is here other there

>Genetic studies have revealed that there is no scientific basis for the concept of race

Factually false left wing propaganda that has been spread for the last few decades, up to this very day, all over the world.
There are hundred of studies proving the opposite, I have lost the list of links, if anyone got them.

Better question that they can't answer, if there is no genetic difference between races, how come you can tell someone's race from the DNA contained in a single hair?

race is just a lower resolution stand-in for the idea of populations

there are some miss-matches in what population gets categorized into which 'race' but overall it's not an inherently flawed concept, it's just not as high resolution as knowing what the boundaries between populations

If you want to. It has some great photography, or used to.
>I read it for the articles
And the pope isn't one of the soys because of excessive masturbation.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loki's_Wager

when i say race, just like when anyone says race it mostly refers to the 19th century racialist ideas

you can use race in a very wide, generic way, but thats not being talked about here
on nationalist, racialist places like pol people unfortunately combine these two different definition of race and equalize them which just makes you look like idiots to everyone outside of your little clique

i dont understand how that link is in any way related to what i said

fair enough, but maybe you've taken the 'race is just a meme' meme to strictly

Attached: Sub-continental_origin_of_European_haplotypes_derived_from_admixed_genomes.png (4086x3001, 2.54M)

>difference between 2 things are gradual
>therefore they don't exist or the differences are irrelevant

it's the classic continuum fallacy

Attached: Color_gradient_illustrating_a_sorites_paradox_with_labels.png (768x257, 9K)

We're the same species..

It literally goes against common sense to say were all the same race

National geographic has been nigger voyeurism for like 50 years. Drop that shit and get help quick

I cancelled my subscription a long time ago. It was after the transgender issue. 5 years ago they were still producing quality stories.

>national geographic
>look up chief editor
>makes sense now

Attached: 3545135135443.jpg (600x541, 47K)

im not a racialist, nationalist, a sjw nor a liberal so i try being objective

youd be surprised how much threads get derailed and how much stupid trolls and flame wars come to be because of petty misunderstood definitions and ideological emotional zealotry

keep in mind that before a couple hundred years ago it was very rare for people to travel far from their birth places

what little genetic drift there was occurring quickly coalesced within tight geographical regions over generations

Attached: Demonstrating_Hardy-Weinberg_proportions_using_10,000_SNPs_from_the_HapMap_CEU_European_and_YRI_Afri (860x520, 185K)

Attached: 22d.jpg (1225x2793, 1.1M)

well if it is like that then obviously the whole race theory isnt correct at all
the race theory clearly has categorical racial distinctions and these categorical races predisposed to certain things
if it doesnt exist, which it doesnt obv, then the whole race theory is bogus

no fallacies, just you getting butthurt over nonexisting things, defending the narrative of your ideology instead of actual facts

>Genetic studies have revealed that there is no scientific basis for the concept of race

So implying that, skin colour and physical characteristics are not formed by genes.

That's a bold move, denying the whole basis of scientific biological understanding.

My mom collected and kept them when she was young. Reading nat Geo from the 70s is awesome. Full of race realism

its not as little as you think
migrations and conflicts were much more common in the the past than they are now
and it still doesnt change anything about what i said either way

A black man can be raised in europe but that will never make him a European.

Race is a "social construct" of using humanity's current words/knowledge to give meaning to statistical grouping of commonly occurring traits between different people groups.

They aren't wrong in that its a social construct in that we, as people defined these groups and by what traits distinguishes them. But that doesn't mean distinct traits arent occurring.

they are doing what creationists do by looking gaps between fossil records, declaring there isn't a clean cut difference between fossils A and fossil B thus negating the entire field/concept of evolutionary biology.

its not full of race realism just like these today arent full of sjw pseudoscience

they are being presented in a narrative like that to sub 100 iq pseuds who read the loaded title and get outraged just like they were in the 1970s

creationists are most often retarded not beinga ble to tell the difference between science and religion, but modern science isnt a peach
evolution is a theory with more holes than swiss cheese, because just like with creationism, its goal isnt science, but justification of a certain worldview

nat-geo has been turned into a leftist shithole mag long time ago.. now it's commie propaganda only.
cut this shit and don't buy any mainstream mags. they are all commie faggot shit

>race theory
maybe you should explain what you think race theory is, because I don't think it's the same thing that most people even know about in 2018

you can say race doesn't exist but it doesn't mean the underlaying substrate, which is that there are difference in populations, both genetically and culturally, doesn't exist

you're just playing semantics if your biggest concern is the term race being substituted for populations

Attached: main-qimg-966b9864d82683e19aa8c2e7fb4f847e.png (500x509, 65K)

>big lipped nigger on the cover
lol never change NG

Lol this

You just gave more or less a textbook example of a continuum fallacy, while claiming you avoid said fallacy.

>maybe you should explain what you think race theory is, because I don't think it's the same thing that most people even know about in 2018
you dont think i and i know that

when literally everone talks about race they meant THE race theory (every better sociology or history or anthropology or whatever book can explain it - its pretty famous)
when pol and rest of stormfags talk about race you mean your ingroup belonging and ideological worldview (whatever you consider that to be)

>you're just playing semantics if your biggest concern is the term race being substituted for populations
nobody except you understands race as that
conversation between the normal world with you can thus be nothing, but semantics and ideological narrative pushing

>migrations and conflicts were much more common in the the past than they are now

exactly, that's why genetic populations are so distinct and why there are different populations within (and outside) of a general race category

Attached: 0917charlie.jpg (360x290, 134K)

read a book

Race is not a social construct because it just implies that there are differences between people that you can group them by. Those differences exist with or without a name, or a social construct, it's just that they can be defined at any point.

i knew it was hopeless to try to explain this to you
keep having your own internal clique understanding of the world

I like how they so happily invoke bullshit like “more variation within than between,” the salience of which has been debunked countless times. Essentially they are talking about the fact that allele frequencies appearing at an individual locus (gene location) vary more between individuals of the same racial group than between racial groups. Unfortunately for them, we know that it is possible to identify a person’s race by looking at the frequency of the alleles at several loci at the same time. A holistic approach to the human genome helps us to delineate between the races. In fact, the more genes you look at, the more the accuracy of your prediction approaches 100%. Ultimately, these differences explain why Swedes don’t give birth to black children and vice versa. They explain why the tools employed by 23andme work. They explains why, on the whole, we see and can properly group people together based on phenotype. They explain why cluster analysis works or why members of the same group are more similar than members of different groups genetically.

Not very concerned about race thing but knowing that kike pushes it gives you clear understanding of their future goals.
They will try to bring hordes of monkyes to your country under this title .

>nobody except you understands race as that

I don't think many people here have a super vague and abstract idea of race being unrelated to genetics

Attached: 25s1se8.png (892x671, 161K)

Who the fuck buys physical magazines in this day and age?

the exact dividing line between orange and red is unclear, does that mean that the color orange and the color red don't exist?

>makes the same logical fallacy repeatedly
>obviously doesn't understand the mistake he's making
>"'read a book' that will show him"

you can't even avoid the most basic logical fallacy, but I am the uneducated one.

>Should i cut this drug
Yeah, they have become a propaganda tier publication. They are purposely misrepresenting information to trick stupid people into thinking there are no differences between the races. They are willfully ignoring differences in gene expression and claiming that since the same genes are present there must be no difference. This would me like claiming a golden retriever is the same as a beagle, and they both are wolves because they have the identical genes.

its like talking to a wall
noithing i say gets heard
you literally ignore everything i said, like i didnt say anything and keep pushing same argumentation that i was never even talking about
people are not fucking colours

i should just go, dont know why i even came here
its like going to marxist forums and explaining them why their theories dont work in practice and why nobody likes them
futile

what am i supposed to say
you ignore literally everythign i said and keep talking about same issues i never even talked about
id have more luck teaching cows to talk

Never said it was. Science is just another way of addressimg reality like how religion was. Different style maps with different legends, both show the same territory.

Its going to have gaps and unexplained because we just don't have the comprehension for it yet.

Top kek.
I mean technically, the Mongoloid race is about 4 - 6 IQ points ahead of the Caucasoid race, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Im not saying the differences don't exist. Im saying the way we group them is defined by society, thats the social construct.

Doesn't invalidate the differences that occur

Based Jared Taylor made a video debunking all that shit
>youtube.com/watch?v=9v4_JfUPO9M

Attached: 1425064535021.jpg (429x410, 66K)

Nobody is saying that people are like colors. What they are saying is that human variation does exist on a sort of spectrum but that there is utility in dividing people, much like there is utility in dividing up the color spectrum. We can make valid predictions based on a person’s race, and such predictions can be incredibly useful when looking at not just one trait but a whole set of traits. While a person may differ on one trait from the rest of his population, he will tend to regress towards the mean and exhibit other traits that are more in line with what would be expected from his population.

we are all the same race

could you have viable offspring with any female on the planet?

(OP)
we are all the same race

could you have viable offspring with any female on the planet?

t.retard

I had a subscription from between when I was 10 and when I was 16 when there started to be more and more pieces like that. Makes me sad, the cover and design is so iconic and just autistically reading it all in one go as soon as it came was something I always looked forward to. The quality is really atrocious nowadays.

im sorry you couldnt pass bio 1

Spooky

I’m sorry you’re retarded,
Species != race

yes, we are all the same species and race is a social construct

im sorry you never found any human species courses either

Do you not know the difference between "race" and "species"?

You mean taxonomy? That’s correct. It’s been corrupted by egalitarian zealots. There is less genetic distance between a Caucasian and a Neanderthal than there is between a Caucasian and a negroid, but Neanderthal is separate species because they are extinct and can’t complain.

No.

BECAUSE WE ARE DIFFERENT SPECIES NOT DIFFERENT RACE.

WHY DON'T CHIMPS MATE WITH ORANGUTANS?

WHY DONT HUMPBACK WHALES MATE WITH SPERM WHALES?

WHY DON'T BLUE JAYS MATE WITH CROWS?

THEY ALL BLEED THE SAME COLOR?

Attached: 1456851480653.jpg (548x356, 38K)

>Oh vey it’s a social construct.
You know that all of language and the ideas we communicate using language can be regarded as social constructs.
These social constructs have predictive validity that makes them incredibly useful. That is all that matters.

if two white people have a baby what race will the baby be?

Yeah you’re smarter than the staff at Nat geo since you had whichever pill meme on Jow Forums you subscribe to. You don’tneet science n shit you got memes and bullshit links to idiots spouting garbage.

Attached: 4E2AA0FB-8EBC-4B9B-B0F2-EE9AB8F7D826.jpg (500x500, 65K)

KIKES!

NatGeo has been compromised. Look at their articles over the last few months.

(((Susan Goldberg))). hahahaha....

They can't have babies with each other. Nothing in nature stops you having babies with an Eskimo.

Also, the moon landings were fake dipshit.

The human race.

Cancelled my subscription last year. Had stopped reading them, quality was horrid. Always global warming and sjw stuff in each article.

so wait...

evolution isn't real?

the baby will (probably) look white, but culturally we will assign it all sorts of traits

biologically, its no different that a black baby

Except for all these phenotypic differences of course which obviously is the work of sociology and not biology.

Attached: 4CD4BBA5-1892-425A-AB8A-AC8AE7E7A708.png (1334x750, 1.87M)

back to your original post I responded to:

>differences between people are gradual, between different genetics, which are intermixed themselves
Yes
>not category based distinctions,
those aren't mutually exclusive. That is the mistake you make.

There is graduation in the age you are, but also a category like "child". When do you stop being a child? With 16 years, 2 months, 4 days, 16 hours? of course not.
But the category of child makes sense, because children share characteristics that are relevant in law, ethics, medicine, social conventions etc. That doesn't mean that some adults or babies can't have some of the same characteristics (for example small height, low impulse control, you name it) or some children don't have some characteristic others have (like being extremely tall) but on average this category explains a lot and is very helpful.

>naturally people differ in a ton of ways, genetically, culturally, religiously etc.
of course
>however its not fully predisposed in one way and you cant pull a line and say one race is here other there
nobody but very confused or stupid people claim that and if you draw a strict line it is going to be arbitrary as fuck, like it happened in the categorization-processes in Apartheid South Africa.

But sometimes you need to draw an arbitrary line to make definitions easier, like age of consent or state borders.

(And no, I don't think we need lines to define races like in South Africa even because it wouldn't make a lot of sense.)

Arbitrary bullshit.

there is actually more diversity WITHIN a "race" than when comparing "races" to one another

why are East-Asians under-represented in the NBA or in long jump gold medalists?

Do their cultures just hate to jump? Or could it have to do with height, bone and muscle structure?

>A term that is used in reference to groups of similar living organisms is exactly the same as a term that's used to categorize humans by genes or traits

Because east asians are not in a culture that holds the NBA to priority lmao

Yes, some cultures practice things more than others - look at the world cup