What are you right-wingers going to about the sexual free market and controlling it? As leftist, I can only see 3 viable options.
1.)Sexdolls,sexbots and vr
2.)legalization of prostitution and granting of sex tickets to the underprivileged in the sexual markets
3.)State mandated and controlled marriges
So what you're saying is that women exist only for the sexual pleasure of men?
Naturally not. I think that sexual pleasure is a human right.
1 is good.
2 minus the sex tickets is also good.
3 is autistic af not to mention ripe for corruption.
>What are you right-wingers going to about the sexual free market and controlling it?
They'll complain a little bit about the degeneracy while not lifting a finger to oppose it. Just like they've done with every other degeneracy being promoted and normalized by the Jews.
What, do you don't actually expect Conservatives to actually conserve anything, do you?
How I see it is that sexual frustration along with virginity tends to be more of class issue than just universal one thus I think the prostitution should be in some cases subsidized. Particularly since this could be for example be tied to paid holidays and part of unemployment benefits.
>Naturally not. I think that sexual pleasure is a human right.
But eating isn't...go figure.
Those who do not work dont get to eat.
After or before the Civil War?
>Those who do not work dont get to eat.
Is that why so many people starved to death in communist countries? because none of them worked?
Bad harvests,internal strife,strikes,civil wars and the world war 2 tended to be the big reasons for corps failure. But when compared to Bengali starvation or the Irish situation in relative population size I don`t think those were particularly unique especially in non-industrial countries like early soviet union or china.
4) society decides on its own to once again support traditional gender roles. oxyctocin bonding becomes common knowledge and people dont want to lose the ability to fall in love in the future so they dont sleep around as much. hookup culture largely dies off as people become more careful about who they end up with. chads endless pussy train comes griding to a hault and now even chad maintains a steady gf for regular sex raher then relying on temporary hoookups with a multitude of women. incels still wont get laid, but more regular guys will find themselves with a chance and overall though fewer people are having casual sex more people will be having sex overall.
all from just an exponentially growing public awareness. no authoritarian central state is required to enforce this, its a cultural shift that we need. grassroots
how is it a human right? not trolling i just dont get it. most human rights are about things you have the right to do that no government should prevent. rights arent about what you should get for free.
>Bad harvests,internal strife,strikes,civil wars and the world war 2 tended to be the big reasons for corps failure.
It certainly wasn't the fact that judeo communism doesn't actually know what it's doing and caused untold amounts of suffering.
The content of this thread is more degenerate than leftypol.
>rights arent about what you should get for free
Check his flag, he unironically believes that's exactly what "rights" are
Yes the same way men only exist to provide food and shelter for them.
Leftists don't know the difference between negative rights and positive "rights", IE privilages. They also say sex is a right because they like sex and so their lizard commie brains conclude that the government should provide access to it.
>how is it a human right?
Because OP is a virgin and wants to force women to have sex with him because he deluded himself into believing sexual pleasure is a human right.
Doctrines such Lysenkoism in agriculture was damn bad too(denying that corps had hereditary genetics for 3 decades) not to mention all the bad science that soviets engaged in its earlier years not to mention all the infighting,factionalism and other tensions.
There are both negative and positive rights, just because you refuse to recognize agency of positive rights does not mean that they should be denied or ignored.
and we can support traditional gender roles without completely banning women from the workplace. just turn off affirmative action and hire on merit so that only the right person for the job gets hired. nobodies freedom is impacted, no individuals rights stomped on. if a woman wants to work bad enough, wants that independence, no law should prevent her. though society might sort of frown at her for not raising kids instead at home. thats all, a more mature general public that understands that men are men and should do most of the men stuff and women are women and should do most of the women stuff basic common knowledge.
would most women even want to work if stable family units with one man making enough money to support a family was the norm? no, most would rather stay at home and raise their kids. especially if we stop trying to brainwash people with so-called equality and forcing the socioeconomic conditions that put women in the workplace. fewer women would want to work, fewer would have to work, more women would go back to doing their more important traditional roles.
>Doctrines such Lysenkoism in agriculture was damn bad too(denying that corps had hereditary genetics for 3 decades) not to mention all the bad science that soviets engaged in its earlier years not to mention all the infighting,factionalism and other tensions.
Because Communism is Jewish and therefore inherently anti-White. Hence why it's so evil and corrupt and always collapses.
no
if you cant find a decent woman to marry then you have to be alone
no whores
no bots
no state
sexual degeneracy is a big problem in the west and you faggots are at fault
tfw 30yr no gf
>Food and shelter is a right
>Sex, another biological imperative built into your DNA, isn't
That site bans incels and related content on sight.
Ah yes otherwise I will report the women to the peoples commissar for sex redistribution for trial XD
>Ah yes otherwise I will report the women to the peoples commissar for sex redistribution for trial XD
You'd just rape them. Because you judeo commies are known for raping everything in your path.
I don`t honestly think that is right since commitards(the first organized communists of the modern age) originated from France and her republican ideals.
Women come the most from rape and have higher chances of pregnancy then from consensual sex.
ok, so apparantly freebies are a "right". a "positive right"
so what makes a right? is it just anything a human being wants badly enough even if its not even criticial to his survival?
how does your right to have sex because you realy really want to, trump someone elses right not to be forced by a government to fuck you?
sex cant be a human right for this reason
>Monogamy is maintained by moral and religious principles governing society for untold amount of time
>Commie kike tears these down
>What the fuck, how do we regulate now
Please die of hunger already
Do you honestly believe that those traditional values could be achieved in society by voluntary means? I honestly don`t see that "change starts from yourself" thing working overall, just look vegans or pacifists.
>I don`t honestly think that is right since commitards(the first organized communists of the modern age) originated from France and her republican ideals.
Marx, Lenin and Trotsky were Jews. Stalin was fucking a Jew. Communist governments were always backed by Jews or filled with Jews. Communism's beliefs are Jewish.
Those are facts if you accept them or not.
>Women come the most from rape and have higher chances of pregnancy then from consensual sex.
Silence, you. The adults are talking.
Sexual liberation started with Hippies and the west, not the soviets.
>Do you honestly believe that those traditional values could be achieved in society by voluntary means? I honestly don`t see that "change starts from yourself" thing working overall, just look vegans or pacifists.
Which is funny because judeo communists want to destroy tradition...and race, heritage, history, culture, family and faith.
So you think that women should be forced to recognize these rights by being compelled to fuck incels
>Sexual liberation started with Hippies and the west, not the soviets.
Cultural Marxism is just as Jewish as Communism.
Sexual pleasure is a human right, it's why god gave you hands, why the internet gives us porn and why the UK is a bigger force of tyranny than in 1776
needs and rights are different
needs are things you need to survive
rights are things you are allowed to do that no state should be allowed to prevent you from doing
this idea that free stuff can be a right seems to totally degrade the definition of what a right is.
the constitution for example it says you have the right to the PURSUIT of happiness, it doesnt say you have the right to happiness. but the right to the PURSUIT of it. as in the government wont provide it, but it shouldnt get in your way either.
You dont even fucking know history of your own synagogue of Satan little shabbos goy. USSR before Stalin reaction aspired to become second Weimar republic. Hippies and other commie shit in US was propagated by USSR subversion in collaboration with CIA niggers already building NWO.
>because they were X in some way means that they will always be X regardless of agency or action
The infamous "poisoning the well" rhetorical device.
I don`t think that the early soviets were fond of jews considering their banning of talimud and jewish minority languages in 1919, not to mention what they did to polish-all Russian jewish laborbund.
>the constitution for example it says you have the right to the PURSUIT of happiness,
That's the Declaration of Independence, moron.
Just have prostitution legalized and that's it. Doesn't solve lack of gf, but makes being incel a choice.
1.Rubber corpse.
2.You cant force sex workers to fuck hobos.
3.Thats fascism.
Only having a rubber corpse in the one that’s gonna work and you need to buy that shit yourself you fucking loser.
>The infamous "poisoning the well" rhetorical device.
timesofisrael.com
>I don`t think that the early soviets were fond of jews considering their banning of talimud and jewish minority languages in 1919, not to mention what they did to polish-all Russian jewish laborbund.
And meanwhile they protected Jews and Judaism and were filled with Jews.
the state ought to provide food and shelter, though they are not rights. You need food and shelter to survive. You don't need sex, you just WANT it.
>>Sex, another biological imperative built into your DNA, isn't
I know it feels different but you won't die if you don't get laid.
because you were raised in a society where the state decides everything and people have abandoned personal responsibility. you cant even imagine a world where change comes from the people rather then the state. because you are used to the state being like the parents and the citizens being like helpless children.
weve been raised into a state of helplessness by letting the government decide everything. you dont even read about whats in your food, you just trust its safe because government said so. people dont even look into what theyre eating, theyve outsourced food safety responsibility to the government and look at how that has gone, there are poisons in the food supply.
and im not even saying change starts from yourself. at some level it does sure, but i think its a cop out people use to abandon all community responsibility.
nothing lasts forever. at some point society will wake up to how theyve handed over all their responsibility and how its being abused. and how we need to just tune out of the corrupt system and do our own things instead. we will be left with no choice but to take back responsibility or die.
I mean even memeing you retard, studies have shown what I said.
There's a fucking reason rape is one of the most common fetishes for women, and why throughout history they'd throw themselves at the feet of conquerors. It is female nature, but like being a house wife, feminists have programmed them into ignoring their primal biological programming.
Not directly but let's see you say that to the men who commit suicide all the time because they get too lonely.
>I mean even memeing you retard, studies have shown what I said.
"oy vet goyim! how dare you deny SCIENCE!"
Weak faggots we're better off without.
avoiceformen.com
Now fuck off you kike fuck.
Though georgist economics.....?
Idk what are you trying to ask OP
>you right wingers
your premise is more retarded than your flag
>human rights
what are you, a fucking faggot?
>avoiceformen
ROTFLMAO
>the state ought to provide food and shelter, though they are not rights
at least you make the distinction
i dont trust the government to give people so much free shit though. the government wants people dependent on them, so they want to replace as many personal responsibilities as possible with people relying on the government instead of themselves or society.
the government will never be your friend. it is always the enemy by its nature. cannot be trusted. if they seek to put a roof over your head and food in your belly its because they want to control you and make you dependent.
Consumerism,freedom of markets and actions were the reasons for the creation of the pill, not soviet subversion that was mainly focused on spiking racial tensions.
>timesofisrael.com
Are you familiar with the word synonym?
>links to timesofisrael
how is tel aviv this time of year?
Nice get!
I was just reposting his link, I don`t think that he did understand that words can have multiple meanings if they are synonyms.
Ei riitä tarvitaan kansankomissario seksin saamisen oikeuden suhteen jossa mielestäni etuasemaan tulee asettaa puolueen lojaalit jäsenet sekä muut vallankumoukselle hyödylliset elementit.
>Consumerism,freedom of markets and actions were the reasons
So, materialism? Can you remind me who was behind materialism?
>the pill
Invented by literal kike.
>mainly focused
It had a long and wide reach. Hard to believe thing as harmful as hippie degenerates have nothing to do with it.
Materialism and market forces are not the same thing. But materialism can be traced back to early modernity with Voltaire if you are really interested in talking about that.
If you want to maintain society this should indeed be a right because if women are unrestricted there will be a 80/20 rule for sex which makes a large pool of men unproductive.
not being an incel
have you tried it? it's great
Eh, nah. As far as we know lower classes actually fuck more.