Erase one thing from history besides the Jews

>what is the gold standard
>what is Bitcoin

>if you erase the Jews you erase all problems
>88

Huh? You can require banks to carry 100% reserves.

The holocaust

Niggers, even though the jews brought them here.

Whatever Semitic race/tribe preceded the Jews

This graph is beyond autistic.

That’s not how banking works you twat.

Bankers, Industrialist, cities, leftist, and the elite gets the bullet too.

oy vey!

Banks reserve 10% to cover liquidity Incase daily withdrawals exceed daily deposits.

The bank only shows $100 in a deposit account as cash, the remainder is an asset on their balance sheet.

>loan out 90%
>keep 10 on hand just in case
ONLY JEWS

Attached: AKARI.jpg (690x932, 54K)

It's exactly how it works retard
t. economics major.

Enjoy never being able to buy a house because all loans have outrageous interest rates

Thirty Years War

See t. CPA

Interest rates are rising in the U.S. right now. If your buying a house get in now.

Play Salieri

Except that houses would only cost 20% of what they do now

Forgot pic

Attached: Amadeus - 11.png (976x407, 398K)

August 18, 1920
Women get right to vote
Proceed to destroy Western Civilization

>implying the Gold standard prevented the fractional reserve system

Lying

And in doing so defacto banning loans, which is absolutely retarded

>banning ursury is retarded

Myself

Yes, banning interest is retarded. Would you prefer only the already wealthy be capable of starting businesses?

imo the only problem with interest based loans is that the banks are legally allowed to change the interest rate whenever they want.

What the fuck is that about?

It didn't? The penalty of operating a fractional reserve on the gold standard is bank insolvency. Shitty situation, yes, but it's localized and the free market would have disincentived it. Without the standard, that same problem is exponentialed and totally legal

No it isn't. It means if I have $200 I can lend $100 and keep $100.

>there is $1000
>there is 1000 dollars
nigger tier english, user. clean your shit up

Bullshit. The role of the bank shouldn't be to give out loans, it should be to protect money. The private parties that actually own that money should be the ones lending it

fractional reserve banking is a meme tho.
in reality loans operate independently of deposits, and if the minimum reserve requirements are not met, the bank requests the fed reserve to issue them the difference

Attached: HymanMinsky-1.jpg (400x300, 38K)

In reality, it requests the taxpayer to bail them out

World War I

Attached: 1494186240796.jpg (3000x2102, 1.78M)

>loans operate independently of deposits
Lol how?

>Erase one thing from history besides the Jews.
i erase all of asia

centralized anything

White people there you go everything caused by jews never ever happens without you european cuck puppets.

Wut?

Don't bother, it's going to be some lateral thinking Jewish mind trick to ever make that a true statement

>requests
double entry book keeping. what the libertarians don't realize (or don't want you to realize) is that private banks have the power to print money (electronically of course, which is the vast majority of money). They don't have to wait for money to come in before they lend it out, since they don't actually take money from one account and deposit it in another, they simply create a new entry.

Slavery in the Americas

They literally just make them with bank money and cover their reserve requirements afterwards. A loan at Wells Fargo is just going to be $100 "wells fargo bucks", which are as good as dollars, deposited in an account at wells fargo. If you make any transactions after that which require movement of federal bank money between banks, they may cover it with interbank loans or a loan from the fed. Right now, as far as I understand, they don't really have to do much in the interbank market anymore because the banks have so much in reserve after 2008.

No shit, you just described fractional reserve banking, congratulations

That isn't fractional reserve banking as described in the OP because loans are independent of their reserves. They could have $10 in reserve and make $1000 in loans, it doesn't matter to them. What matters is credit worthiness of whoever walks into their bank. If it seems like a good enterprise, they'll loan you the money at a rate that makes getting a loan from either the fed or other banks to cover liquidity still profitable.

bump bump bump

Petrochemical refining capability. The world is rapidly running out of potable water.

no, banks actually have more power in the model I describe. They can operate without meeting reserve requirements, since they don't rely on "loanable funds," but rather just create new deposits; they then tell the feds to increase their reserves if required.

You are just repeatedly describing fractional reserve banking, there is no difference. Actually now i realize that you are just using jewish tactics to derail the conversation. Get out kike

fractional reserve banking is very good. the fraction just can't be too small.

Rothchilds waterloo spy

Then u don't understand the model above. This guy is right:
In reality banks have more power than the typical money multiplier model.

humans

They need 10% on hand, as the infographic demonstrated

Attached: Screenshot_20180701-003028.jpg (1080x2160, 607K)

You can give loan without intrests banks can be part of the government

This.

Not every Jew is Jewish. It's a mindset.

The Ashkenazim are false Jews, they worship Satan/demons. They control the central banking system and politicians.

good work Lev. I'll see you at the synagogue for some gefilte fish and matzah
yes, there is reserve requirement, as I said. But the reserves required to be maintained are predetermined by the level of deposits existing two weeks earlier. In other words, there's a two week period for banks to bump their reserves up if they lend excessively. As I've said, this "topping up" is done by the federal reserve in the US.

in your money multiplier model the amount of money in circulation is still dependent on the amount of loanable funds or deposits (since this is what can be multiplied, and only then to a certain extent). Imagine if there was a high demand for dollars, but not enough available? the economy would grind to a halt. So private banks keep the money flowing and the fed has to comply with their requests for additional reserves, or risk triggering a collapse.

satisfied?

Nonwhites.

hebrews

(((compounded interest)))

Niggers

Biological: non-whites
Human invention: socialism and all its decedents.

WTF? Get a loan and put it in the bank? You stupid?

+1 for crypto. In Bitcoin's case, it's capped at a maximum of 21,000,000 (divisible to 8 decimal places, currently). On the otherhand, BTC is being (((deliberately))) crippled by having a 1MB blocksize in place which is leading to inflation through saturation (of other cryptos).
Most of my money is on BCH (Bitcoin as it was intended), but I'd be happy if another took over, provided it still had the same properties that Bitcoin originally had.
#holocaustthefed

Attached: 1507352211436.jpg (640x640, 95K)

poople chosen god's

Attached: visitIsraelgodschosenpoople_v5.png (900x900, 138K)

TAXES

Attached: 1503704876360.png (632x435, 241K)

the serpent in the garden from its very first

humanism

transhumanism