Why does the far-right support social darwinism, but at the same time lament Jews for dominating white people?

Why does the far-right support social darwinism, but at the same time lament Jews for dominating white people?

Attached: tenor.gif (320x240, 1.79M)

Nanomachines, son.

We subscribe to the Rules of nature, but Jews are unnatural beings.

Attached: 7C53674B-BB29-4E0B-89C9-B5F28F8DA19C.jpg (644x792, 150K)

Because they're not part of our society.

>doesn't realize they don't want it unless they are the ones in control of it.

Why doesn't the lesser predator throw itself at the apex predator?

Because natural selection is not taking place. Only in a manufactured setting where whites have anchors applied to them via affirmative action, race quotas, job hires, etc, can jews compete with whites. Remember jews get all the perks of being a "minority." Jerws are getting artificially boosted up, and whites are being held back, it's not a fair comparison. If natural selection were truly happening, then WHITES would dominate, as we did, and as we will.

Because they rigged the game.
There's no natural selection anymore.
There are only customers...

That's still natural selection. Humans are part of nature. Economic competition is a continuation of monkeys fighting over fruit.

(OP)
Like probably most political movements, the various far-right movements are just selfishness disguised behind ideology. The far-righters you refer to don't really support social darwinism, they just use it as propaganda. What they really want is to obtain more resources and pleasure for themselves and to vent their rage and frustration by chimping out. Far-right tribalism offers them the hope of this. There's likely something hardwired into us as mammals, a primitive mental reaction to scarcity: when resources are scarce, gang up with your tribe and go attack the other tribes and take their resources. Much of the far-right is just the manifestation of this hardwired instinct in politics. This is why so many political extremists (not just far-right) are social, economic, and/or sexual outcasts. Despair and pain lead to adopting ideologies and political movements. But there is no true love for the tribe in most, I think, far-righters - if suddenly everyone except the tribe vanished, the tribe itself would split and begin to fight over who was the "whitest" or whatever.

Because the jews aren't fighting fairly.

Attached: hollywood-jews.jpg (580x811, 158K)

what does darwinism have to do with fighting fairly? organisms in nature don't fight fairly.

Because of [INSERT AUTISTIC SCREECH HERE] which supposes that selection isn't occurring naturally.

Because they're racist anti-Trump pro-abortion retards.

Trips of absolute truth

Attached: Rabbi Ovadia Yosef - 'goyim were born to serve jews,' Times of Israel called Yosef 'a (1000x750, 223K)

Everything that you describe is perfectly natural. Humans are part of nature. Many animals in the wild use deception and social politics to advantage themselves.
Your claim that Jews need affirmative action, etc. to compete with whites is also pretty silly given that Jews became successful in Europe long before any of that existed.

Because the Jews are the real nazis.

> lament Jews for dominating white people?
because its a smart propaganda play that is needed to take back what is ours. additionally jewish metods of controling the world are real gay.

Attached: tay-explains-it-for-you.webm (840x676, 561K)

> Far Right

> Darwinism.

Stop making fucking assumptions lad.

Because bigots are low test.

>Because they are winning right now it means we have to accept is and give up
No. If they win, they win, if we fry them, we win. Pretty easy. They will only have proven to be superior once we are gone.

Nice pilpul, kike. Jews having an artificial advantage via affirmative action is NOT natural. Jews are getting the same free gibs as 85 IQ niggers and then they walk around as if they are on the same level as whites. Whites have to do everything the hard way WHILE being put in an artificial disadvantage to every other group. After all that, we STILL come out on top or, near the top, in everything. You guys could never compete with whites in a natural selection setting, that's why you need these gibs like an 85 IQ nigger.

If they manage to convince white people to give them an advantage, that's natural selection. If white people put them in an oven, that's natural selection too though.

No, it's not, it actually isn't natural selection. Natural selection happens NATURALLY. Convincing goyim to go against their own self-interest is NOT natural, as it would've never happened had another outside source not been there.

Us whites would've naturally taken cave of our own, THAT'S IT. No free gibs to niggers and jews, that is not natural, that is artificial and goes against anything that would've happened naturally. Just because something is happening, does not mean it is happening due to natural selection. It can be happening due to artificial means that would've never been there naturally.

>why are whites opposed to their own genocide
hmmm, i don't know op, some things just have to remain a mystery i guess

This.

>human influence is not natural
>what is social Darwinism
Everything humans do is natural and part of evolution.

Because they are actually leftists, victim complex and all.

Everything humans do is natural and part of evolution? As you a retard? So a tranny cutting their dick off is natural? Their dick would've naturally just fell off because they think they're a woman? NO, but their dick is off, and it DIDN'T happen naturally, it happened artificially. You can just say X is happening, therefore is is due to natural selection. That is a fundamental misunderstanding of natural selection.

using intelligence to control organisms of lower intelligence is not artificial

You have no idea what "natural selection" refers to.

jews cheat. they pretend to be white to get laws passed to help minorities, then they pretend to be minorities to take advantage of those laws. Jews are not our leaders, they are not in charge, but they pretend they are and they convince others that they are and one day you wake up and everyone is listening to what some jew says because they think you think jews are in charge and dont want to rock the boat. Jewish domination of western culture can be describe with one word: con. They are con men through and through, taking advantage of western morality and using our altruism against us. The funny thing is, if the jews ever do successfully get rid of us, they themselves will also soon disappear because without their hosts they are worthless, inbred, uncivilized desert rats who are grossly outnumbered by the enemies they themselves have created while using whites as their host.

A flea may sit on the head of a dog, but it does not rule the dog. Parasites can not exist without their host.

It's not fair when other races win

It not due to intelligence, it's due to the free gibs. Watch what happens once the free ride goes away, which it will. The artificial status jews currently hold will be wiped out once TRUE natural selection takes hold.

>Why do football fans like when their team scores a touchdown, but dislike it when the other team does?
Imagine being this retarded...
You know this is why everyone hates you liberals, right?

Ending your own chance of reproduction is part of natural selection, people who do it don't reproduce and are therefore selected against, people who don't do it and breed will have decedents and their genes will survive. The distinction between natural and artificial is complete bullshit and just something humans made up to feel special.

This guy gets it.

>1 post by this ID
asking an open ended, vague, strawmaned, not well formed question, and/or etc.
>several posts by this ID
putting forth the position that would normally be OP's arguments

My question is why do you guys do this? What's with the proxy flip to change your ID and pretending you're not OP... or using a team where OP abandons the thread after one post? Why not just stick around as OP?

Attached: [email protected] (447x480, 220K)

SO....gas the jews?
race war....now?

>Why does the far-right support social darwinism, but at the same time lament Jews for dominating white people?
Do you want us to give up in our fight? Nice trick kike

You just want us to stop fighting so we lost the darwinistic race

You clearly don't understand evolution.

Hey, it's not my fault you don't know what natural selection is. Maybe use a different term, ey? Affirmative action, race quotas, job hires, etc, are NOT natural. As they can be altered and taken away at any time via legislation, this would mean that they are, BOOM, artificial, and not natural selection.

So according to you, the US constitution is natural selection. Even though it is artificial laws created by men that do not occur naturally. You cannot just say that X is happening, therefore X is due to naturally occurring stimuli. It's not.

Your frame is dishonest. You're a kike and you have to be killed along with your family.

> Why does the far-right support social darwinism
This is not true kike.

> but at the same time lament Jews for dominating white people
Jews are subversive and are doing everything they can to destroy white gentiles. That's why they must be killed. The evil and subversives of the jew is in the genes that's why you have to kill it.




KIKES ARE BLAMING MISSILE ATTACKS ON ASSAD AND PRO IRANIAN FORCES GET IN HERE WE ARE GOING TO WAR AGAIN

Soo are you saying we're supposed to support the jews, even though they are attacking us?

this. op deserves 6 million lashes.

so any rules that humans create are artificial? what does natural selection among humans look like then, fistfights? can you use traps or tools or are those artificial too?

When a beaver builds a dam and floods an entire area, he kills a lot of animals. He changes the evolutionary pressures in that area that is selected towards. Is that natural or artificial? The distinction doesn't make any sense, all animals are natural and all behavior from animals is natural, humans are just part of that. Evolution has no judgement on anything, when humans create cities and laws, we influence the evolutionary pressures but at the end of the day the only thing that matters is who will reproduce and who will not. All distinction you make only exist in your head, the process of evolution has no goals.

The German has it right , if Jews are successfully manipulating a situation where they succeed by exploiting white people it isn't any less natural than insects exploiting the nectar from plants. Many plants have naturally developed defense mechanisms as a result of this relationship with another species; similarly, if white people wish to survive they must find a way to do so against the pressures that are acting against them.

Nice pilpul kikes. Pretending not to know the basics of natural selection just so you can move the goal posts and muddy the waters with inconsequential minutia. Nice try though!

Jealousy

>be Jewish
>support social Darwinism
>muh IQ
>get ethnically cleansed and genocided 800 times
>m-muh 6 gazillion

Attached: woodywarm.jpg (320x320, 24K)

Look, when people say "evolution" or "natural selection", those aren't actual things, those are just descriptions of what happens. Some individuals or entire species die in a certain environment while others survive and continue existing. We just say that the ones who don't exist anymore where selected against, why that was doen't matter. "Evolution" is just a word we use to describe that.

"if white people wish to survive they must find a way to do so against the pressures that are acting against them." So you're saying we should remove the ARTIFICIAL restraints and let natural selection take hold? My god, you are onto something!

is all of law an artifical restraint? is criminality redpilled after all?

>Humans are part of nature.

No, we aren't. Hydrogen bombs and computer chips would be natural by your logic, which means the word natural is meaningless.

what? if natural is defined as something created without human intervention then humans are natural. We didn't design ourselves, nature did.

>Hur dur, why do bears like when they kill a deer, but dislike when wolves kill that deer instead!? Hur dur!
Really makes you think...

Playing victim isnt strength

Jews hide behind their constant persecution and people buy into it. That they deserve things because of how they were treated in the past.

You just claimed that Jews dominate people, yet you condemn muh “far-right” for promoting social Darwinism.

"is all of law an artifical restraint?" YES. Law and order doesn't happen naturally. We had to put a man-made restraint on human behavior to counter-act the bad facets of the natural human character.

The concept of natural and unnatural is something that only exists in the heads of humans. It has no meaning in the physical world.

Well the delineation between artificial and natural is the only thing that's actually artificial in this conversation, but that's just arguing words at this point. But yes, I think new behaviors and social orders can develop to change or counteract whatever pressures are acting on the white population. I think it would have to be social or cultural change, rather than a genetic one. I'm unsure whether it's a genetic or cultural distinction which has brought white people to their current position, or what exactly it is which makes us more exploitable. Perhaps it's just that we have relatively higher living standards and wealth due to our civilizations not being industrialized and not piles of garbage, or maybe it's our social trust and good-naturedness that has allowed us to build successful civilizations but now operates against us because when we apply our trust to non-whites we get stabbed in the back.

>physics and nature designed humans
>humans aren’t natural
Unfortunately your low IQ is natural too.

because people root for their own team of course

We design ourselves daily. We're more than our bodies, we are mental beings who share complex thoughts and learn from experiences of millions of others.

>Why does the far-right support social darwinism,
I don't.

And nature gave us the capacity to have complex thoughts and learn form experience

>saying things we all know while completely missing the point

Thanks for chiming in fuckwit.

Even the concept of "physical world" is a strange description since thoughts are technically physical as well. Human language is extremely limited, unspecific and filled with concepts that don't really reflect the world how it actually is.

just .. stop. You sound like a 13 year old trying to sound intelligent.

Attached: natural.png (1920x1040, 109K)

Are you fucking retarded? How is this a question?

The far-right is composed of white people who want to improve their race through Social Darwinism, and they cannot do that if their racial enemies have taken control over their ancestral homelands.

It isn't hard to figure out. Jews aren't white and won't let whites use Social Darwinism, and maybe Eugenics to improve the race. Ergo the lamentation.

/thread

That definition agrees with me you dumb nigger

"not made or caused by humankind"

You're a retard.

social darwinism allows the strong to improve the environment. jews don't improve anything

>why do social darwinists want their race to prosper?
Why do you think?

You are right about the definition, but it's not a "real" concept like a stole for example, the word "stone" describes something that exists outside of human thoughts, even without humans, the thing that it describes would still be there. The concept of natural and unnatural however are fictional categories.

>humans made or caused themselves
how fucking retarded do you have to be to believe this?

i don't support evil, usury, and the other sins the synagogue of satan commit to get their power over average white people, and most of the world desu. their weakness is their pride they think because they've fooled the goyim for a time they are invulnerable but more and more people are noticing their influence in world affairs and their role in our governments and media and banks. their satanic plans will only work for so long until people put an end to them like we have before again and again.

>The concept of natural and unnatural however are fictional categories.

You mean unnatural categories.

>lament Jews for dominating white people

Our problem is not so much the jews but others of the white race. There is an egalitarian element to the white race character that is too sympathetic to others. That is our problem. We tend to care too much and tend to be too compassionate. The Third Reich proved, at least in modern times, that it is possible for the white race to reign supreme. The Aryan is the warrior class of the white race and offers balance to the egalitarian side. Germany of the 1930's and 40's showed us what is possible. There was the creation of the SS that represented the death squad. Fearless warriors. Yet at the same time, there were anti animal cruelty laws and public smoking bans, etc. Third Reich represented protectors of the world in all forms.

Jews will be a non-issue once the entire white race is awakened to it's destiny.

Attached: We Are Eternal. We Are Forever..jpg (1920x1200, 338K)

Someone would have to be much less retarded than you, if that answers your question.

Darwinism and a cheating backstabber arent the same. Kike

Being smarter than Blacks is all they have in this world to feel good about

Nazis dominated jews. Now fuck off. So smart like rats in a barrel.

I was trying to use a more specific category, as I already said, the human language is extremely limited and imprecise. Human language developed around providing an evolutionary benefit, not around describing the how the universe actually works.

Youre not shit without morals and law and order.

As soon as i reclaim my satanic rights, youre fucked.

Because people are hypocrites. I am, you are, we all are.
Not a bad thing, mind you, as people do need to lookout for themselves, but it is what it is.

Attached: 946ec5370e2e2e57ca83245641b36192.jpg (640x828, 68K)

Sure, but words still mean things. And natural, means things not created or caused by humans.

Humans are part of existence, and as far as we know, we are ruled by the laws of physics, but if we were to create a word that covers everything that can possibly exist, and every action that can possibly exist, for what purpose would we use this word?

> if the jews ever do successfully get rid of us, they themselves will also soon disappear because without their hosts they are worthless, inbred, uncivilized desert rats who are grossly outnumbered by the enemies they themselves have created while using whites as their host.

Understanding this, what is the jew end game?

Attached: Screenshot_20170514-054249.png (1440x2560, 2.05M)

Nobody with a shred of morality supports social darwinism.

It is a useful word in the context of human society and social interaction but completely worthless and even misleading when we talk about scientific descriptions of the world like with evolution. "Natural selection" is used in a societal context to distinguish from the breeding of animals that humans do and is useful for humans communication, although the selection humans make in that instance would still be the same evolutionary process as any other selection. The concept of evolution simply describes the process in which some genetic combinations continue existing while other die off. Evolution is just a description of how genetic combinations change over time, it's just a word we use to describe a phenomenon in the world.

Enjoy watching your grandkids get raped and murdered when half the planet is African, because your "morality" made you feed the African children.

I'm asking what use a word that describes anything and everything would be. What information would such a word convey? How useful would it be?

I fully understand your reluctance to categorize humans as outside of nature, since our very substance is ruled by the laws of nature, but I find the concept to be lacking in practicality.

Evolution doesn't describe anything, only the selection of the genetic combination in organisms. How this selection happens is irrelevant. When we talk about environmental pressures that influence which genetic combinations are more likely to reproduce, the distinction between natural an unnatural is highly misleading, as you can see from the libertarian memeflag poster who thought that these are categories in the real world and that "artificial section" means that humans societies are not part of evolution.

You can say that the term "evolutionary pressure" pretty much describes everything, but it has meaning because it contains the concept of how everything influences the likelihood of certain genetic combinations to reproduce.