Should loli (drawn child pornography) be legal or illegal?

Even if it's not drawn it should be legal in my honest opinion friend.

Attached: 1541382882102.jpg (657x527, 244K)

I would agree, but still, anyone who wants to ban it should define it first.

Drawings don't have rights, nor can they consent, or not consent because they're drawings. Only actual underage porn should be illegal.

>same subject
>same comment
>different pic
do you make this same thread everyday?

the uncanny valley is being crossed as be speak so lifelike rendered CP and the software to create it on workstations will be on the internet

Pedophilia is going to get really bad

>hurr let's ban cartoons that'll really make people want to stop raping real children now that we outlawed their source of escapism

Besides, what would they do the character is over 18 with a loli body?

Attached: 1523133950942.jpg (1920x1080, 169K)

as we "speak" *

good anime but the protagonist is a najor cuck

It's not pedophilia. Rendered images on a screen are not children. Even a sex doll shaped like a child isn't a child. Fucking puritans.

it shouldnt be made illegal but all people who like it should already be dead by then so it doesnt matter

loli is a body type, not an age group. Yes its true there is lots of pedo-tier loli art, but there are billions of legal short flat chested women around the world and liking that doesnt make you a pedo

>germany
fuck off Muhammed get a real woman

Attached: 1542238817918.webm (640x352, 2.1M)

It should be legal but shunned. I.e. anyone speaking about it publicly should be ostracised and humiliated.

It already is illegal. Check rule34.paheal

What the fuck

Attached: 1474743929333.jpg (658x523, 58K)

the levels of wokeness is absurd

>If it looks like a child but is actually a 300 year old succubus is it still loli?
Yes

All fornication and pornography, whether it be photographed, drawn or written should be illegal

Simulacra and video won't be enough for some. Masturbation is considered lesser than because you are experiencing it alone. As long as your mind knows that the machine isn't "there with you" it won't be satisfying in the same way.

There will be a gap between presentient sextoys you can abuse and the flood of realistic depictions of child abuse.

yeah and women should cover up their ankles and wear batman suits
fuck off

Those who view it should be gassed

digits have spoken
youtube.com/watch?v=dFv0605ggAY

why not? Why do you want women to dress like whores?

I should note that authorities would have no idea whether videos were real or not depending on the creator's choice of video artifacts. Real child abuse could be disguised as simulated with some light editing.

Faggotry. Not even once.

Nope. I enjoy toddlercon; even though dumb thots post pics of their naked babies all over facebook and jewtube, cartoons aren't doing damage to anyone unlike embarrassing nakey photos that will now exist forever.

>Oh shit! We have to be at the adoption agency in an hour!

That's fine if the child consents

MODDDDDDDDDDSSSSSSSSSSSSSS DO YOUR FUCKING JOB REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

But something like Enjeru series is okay right? Medaka Kenichi draws/drew good stuff but of course it wasn't real.

You post this in every thread and I refuse to click it. To obvious of bate.

It's one thing to consent to sex. It's natural for children to explore that kind of thing, with other children and with adults, nothing new as far is humanity is considered.

Child pornography is different because there is no instinct related to it in any way, it's a completely new technology for which we have not evolved.

>oh boy this thread again

Attached: abriefguide.jpg (1300x990, 396K)

R A R E

Say hi to Don Black for me.

You are spreading fake news, loli is legal everywhere in the US by state law. Individual states can say whatever the fuck they want, state law overrides it.

Attached: 1518007236783.jpg (736x915, 124K)

Attached: ..............gif (280x199, 210K)

Child pornography isn't a depiction of a child being abused, it's evidence. To conflate that with a drawing or rendering is to say that the suffering of a child is comparable to lines on paper, thus diminishing the severity of the abuse being suffered.

>Should the rights of fictional children be protected?
>Fictional

No. Since they are not real, no real crime can be commited against them.
Real kids (and adults), sure.
Cartoons, drawings, written content, statues, or just plain dirty thoughts should not be illegal.

simulated CP harms the viewer and might lead to further harm from that

This guide is grossly incorrect.

what an absolute eyesore of a flag

Attached: dominica-hi.jpg (1000x500, 123K)

What are they doing? Why are there people doing this? What the fuck is wrong with some people?

>CP harms the viewer
Okay so now pedos that look at CP are actually the victims. Care to clarify this bold statement?

Attached: Japan tells the UN to fuck off.jpg (1222x2845, 1.45M)

holy kek

Attached: 1529192930715.jpg (400x400, 31K)

No trial or jury, speedy death penalty

Sure you can appeal to federal court but you'll still be arrested and prosecuted on the county/state level

I don't think anyone is born a pedophile

>Child pornography isn't a depiction of a child being abused, it's evidence
What about cp made by the kids themselves because their retarded parents give them web enabled camera phones and no supervision, resulting in 12 year olds discovering pornhub, getting addicted to sick fetish shit, making their own porn, and either getting pregnant or branded as sex offenders for texting their bf/gf in middle school?

No victim no crime.
Although it's degenerate, it shouldn't be illegal.

it's just a drawing
lolifags are degenerate as hell but it's still just a drawing
bullet for any who ever try to go 3D though

this

so its sort of a "pre-crime" .... criminal thoughts? not sure how thats gonna work out?

I think there needs to be a clear definition. and the only place a clear definition can be made is oddly enough at a specific age and involving a actual human ... everything else is debatable, and therein lies the problem. who is to say its a depiction of a child or an elf? who can say what age the depiction represents? bear in mind, consensus is not fact. and there are many porn stars (ie miss kitty) that have the bodies of a nine year old, and yet there pron is legal, but the depictions are not!

it seems to me that the only place a clear definition can be made is "humans under the age of eighteen" ... everything else is subject to interpretation

Why do you keep spamming the same thread?
You have had your answers.

It should be banned. We like to think it keeps pedos away from real kids but in reality it just provides another stepping stone to the real thing. It’s unwise to create safe outlets that serve to normalize this behavior

just say there like 1000+ years old, done.

threads like this give lolicons a bad name

Attached: 1.png (1000x1000, 1.04M)

I want to say illegal because it could lead to a slippery slope where you desire the real thing more and more...But that hasn't happened to Japan, so I don't know.

Your information is outdated. As of 2 years ago Loli is federally illegal.

It's not yet known for certain, however it seems the best guess at present is that most pedos are born that way and a few are fetishists.

Mods

Pedophiles shouldn’t even legally be considered human

Take your pedophobic hatred somewhere else, bigot.

Attached: 2DFD0C38-2CA9-4D74-A096-AF24D2C5355B.png (500x387, 110K)

>drawings upset me
What are you? A Muslim?

Attached: 1540732231435.jpg (249x249, 41K)

Why even bother adding the black bars? There is cum everywhere and its obviously penetration, its not like adding them prevents you from being banned. So you might aswell post the image in its entire glory when you get banned anyways.

Attached: 1519665204136.jpg (639x900, 80K)

Fuck you pedo. This hatred is righteous hatred is a perfectly valid emotion

Pedo fucks like you should be stripped of your legal status as human and be sent to be experimented on rather than animals.

is that what loli means???

t-t-thats icing, baka!
he's just showing her how to bake a cake

Is it imorral? Yes.
Should it be illegal? No.

A crime should have an identifiable victim, offending someones sensibilities should not be a crime.

you are having too much fun with this
you are spamming this shit in all the threads

Pedophiles should not be legally considered human

yes

ilya should be illegal

Attached: 1514272224745.jpg (761x789, 79K)

Were taking into the account the fictional age of the character? or maybe there will be someone qualiffied anough to tell if that is a fictional child under the age of consent or just an adult person with child-like appearance?

>This hatred is righteous hatred is a perfectly valid emotion
It absolutely is not.

You are operating under the misguided notion that you are protecting children, when the truth is that children are sexual beings who enjoy sex and are not harmed by it.

If you are aware of this and choose to continue to espouse hatred towards a minority then you are a bigot.

>entire glory

>anarcho-anything
>wants to fuck children

yep

all types of child pornography should be aloud.
Source: not cucked by the state

Get out of my bedroom.

Ewwwwwwwwwww

No. I might even decide to hang you in it.

bet you never told a toddler that

>Had child slaves

>ban pictures of fictional gods
this is fine for religiousfags ALLAHU ACKBAR

Banning paintings depicting whatever is a fucking religiousfags favorite thing to do.

Should be ban violent movies too Jow Forums?

>being gay is normal

Attached: kek.jpg (1600x900, 81K)

False

>Virtue signaling intensifies