Narcissists less likely to support democracy

>New research suggests that people with a narcissistic self-view are more likely to demonstrate lower support for democracy.

>In contrast, people who take a positive, non-defensive self-view and trust others are more likely to show support for democracy, the research found.

Is it too late to reverse this trend?

eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-12/uok-nll120518.php

Attached: Screenshot_20181205-203832.jpg (1076x1284, 301K)

Other urls found in this thread:

medium.com/p/the-religion-of-millenials-3f3d5d79a1f6
motamem.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/The_Dark_Triad_of_Personality_Narcissism_Machiavel.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

medium.com/p/the-religion-of-millenials-3f3d5d79a1f6

Exactly the egotistical kikes and their wasp allies have been ruling over an oligarchy for hundreds of years. They hate democracy.

the naive and submissive who dont like to defend themselves support democracy. amazing how a choice of words depicts a truth differently.

"narcissists" another invention of jews in the 20th century to demonize self preservation

> the research suggset this is probably because narcissists tend to feel entitled and superior to others, which results in lower tolerance of diverse political opinions

So these people call anyone who doesnt have a favorable view of the democratic political system "narcissists" and then says only narcissists have low tolerance of other political opinions

That's probably true. So? Half of people are better than average, and so should be narcissistic, and certainly should oppose democracy.

>kingdoms throughout human history created and sustained by narcissism
Wait till the totalitarians get a load of this!

Welcome to (((psychology)))

This. (((Science))) strikes again.

And dumb, incompetent and ugly people support democracy and socialism because they need to bring everyone down to feel equal

>narcissists tend to feel entitled and superior to others
If narcissists were entitled, wouldn't they be for democracy? Which claims to entitle everyone to vote? And aren't some people superior to others whether cognitively or otherwise? It's all so tiresome.

> being a social conformist beans you are bluepilled
> thinking for yourself makes you redpilled
Wow, just wow. Tho I support democracy, but like in Greek city states where only male citizens.

democracy is narcissistic. imagine thinking you, a common pleb, are important enough to have a say in the grand scheme of things. imagine thinking it's a statesman's duty to represent YOU. that's pure narcissism.

If wanting to have a say is narcissism, there is literally nothing wrong with narcissism. What kind of cuck isn't self-interested?

> low self esteem
Interesting framing. If someone believes that he is a genius, he wants democracy because he thinks he will make a correct political choice. If someone is more conscious about himself, he understands that there may be aspects he is not competent in, so it is better for someone smarter to be in charge.

Why do you think you are important enough to have a right to infringe on other people's rights?

I experience my being and not theirs. Their rights are nothing to me compared with my ultimate right to self-advocacy and self-interest.

and this is the problem with mass pathologization today. you can attach a disease or a disorder to anyone, and the only cure is a bottle or six of antidpressants or antipsychotics.

Narcissist is a codeword for strong personality and sense of preservation. Basically a bad goy

motamem.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/The_Dark_Triad_of_Personality_Narcissism_Machiavel.pdf

Attached: Screenshot_2018-12-06-04-19-02.jpg (720x476, 165K)

New research suggests that the author is an oven dodger and OP is a faggot.

Attached: wat.jpg (400x400, 18K)

I agree, tho in a democracy you theoretically may end up with even less freedom to act in self interests.