AMERICANS WANT TRAINS AND BETTER FORMS OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT

>We like muh roads
>Just take muh plane
Well guess what faggots? People want trains in the United States. I say we bring our troops home, cut the military budget and welfare system, and use the surplus on building some fucking trains that'll make Europe jealous.
garprail.org/documents/polls.pdf
>A Harris poll released February 8, 2006 found that, “as personal travel and freight transportation grows in the future, the American public would like to see an increasing proportion of that traffic going by rail...The modes of transportation which the largest number of adults would like to see ‘have an increasing share of passenger transportation’ are: commuter trai ns (44%), long-dista nce trains (35%), local bus service (23%), and airlines (23%).” The comparable percentage for “long-distance travel by car” was just 10%, long-distance bus service 6% .
apta.com/mediacenter/pressreleases/2015/Pages/150924_High-Speed-Rail-Survey.aspx
>If you build high-speed rail in America, they will come. According to a 2015 survey released by the American Public Transportation Association (APTA), if high-speed rail were available today, two-thirds (63 percent) of Americans are likely to use high-speed trains and this jumps to nearly seventy (67) percent when respondents were informed of the costs and time saving benefits of high-speed rail service.
t4america.org/maps-tools/polling/2010survey/
t4america.org/2009/01/16/poll-most-americans-want-stimulus-to-emphasize-road-and-bridge-repair-and-transit-not-new-road-construction-poll-finds/
Stop denying the viability of trains.
youtube.com/watch?v=mbEfzuCLoAQ
youtube.com/watch?v=ZwiOtMP50Y4

Attached: Compare Trains from Around the world2013.jpg (637x616, 121K)

Other urls found in this thread:

sueddeutsche.de/panorama/bahn-russland-schlafwagen-1.4222731
asia.nikkei.com/Location/East-Asia/South-Korea/High-speed-train-derails-in-South-Korea-injuring-15
youtube.com/watch?v=0JDoll8OEFE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Trains are cool. But can we please make them look like pic related?

Fuck all this modern shit. Put as much tech in it as you like. But at least make it look old and classy

Attached: old-train.jpg (277x182, 14K)

2nd! Imagine high speed trains on the i81 corridor!! Florida? 2hrs instead of 12. NYC? be there before dinner!

duh big corporations are more efficient and encourage competition!

no goobermit needed, let duh market dictate demand!

Attached: TEXAS[1].jpg (616x450, 61K)

And this should discourage me why? Russia has trains from Moscow to Siberia

People just don't understand/comprehend how big the USA is.

sometimes I wonder about building one of those Japanese-style passenger trains along the souther border
I mean we do have the right of way, and it would be a brand new line so no freight to fuck over the passenger trains

Russia is bigger

Why do europeans even act like they're real countries? God I hate Europe.

Not to mention if fucking France could connect everything by train being on par in size with Texas then perhaps those smaller states can easily create trains also. It would just take time for states like Texas, California, Alaska, and New York, every other state would have it pretty easy to build some trains

Attached: SizeComparison-Japan-US-670.png (670x447, 271K)

We have the moon, which is about as hospitable and populated as most of Russia.

They aren't high speed, though. You can take Amtrak's Sunset Limited and Crescent routes to get from LA to NYC... if you have five days.

Attached: amtrak-system-map.jpg (3000x2009, 1.44M)

We invented trains and abandoned them in the 1800s because they are obsolete. The rest of the world hasn't advanced since then.

Attached: Jfk.png (1178x773, 145K)

but 90% of it is near uninhabitable with the west is the only part with European standard-like levels of population density.

>PUBLIC TRANSPORT
>autonomous cars and trucks
HMMMMMMMMM
It's almost like they don't want us to be able to travel manually & freely

Attached: 1510648640968.gif (222x330, 545K)

I know we don't have high-speed trains, doesn't mean we can't have them. For having such a dispersed population trains would be beneficial
>Obsolete
>Europeans use trains on a daily basis

yeah the US is huge, but the fact you can't bother to build a high speed train between LA and San Francisco or NY between DC is beyond me

if we get better public transport, niggers will just nigger them

Either South Dakota hates Amtrak or Amtrak hates South Dakota. It's literally the only continental state without any for of service.

No Brazil bro, that infrastructure would put your GDP to shame and there are better transportation options.

They don't have a choice. They are poor and can't afford to modernize with cars and Interstates. Same with India and Africa who still use 200 year old trains. Poor places use trains. Rich advanced societies use self driving cars. We automated car takeover Europe will be 100 years behind us and they will never catch up because their roads are so poorly maintained and their trains will be useless.

it's really weird because we have far more tourist destinations than ND, too

Lol you're right

Real talk, the only reason public transportation is such shit is because of niggers like me and other minorities. We fuck up everything nice then blame whitey.

We can have either niggers or safe public transportation, not both.

Attached: 3NM3p5P.jpg (621x1000, 285K)

I work for Amtrak. We have the Acela, a modern high speed train.

Don’t forget the new world superpooper

Attached: 4FA8256B-8CF1-424C-9C87-C3B55F978429.jpg (700x400, 122K)

I can get connecting service to lots of towns in Wyoming but if I wanted to say go to Rapid City, SD, I'd be right fucked.

This has to be the most boomer of boomer posts

Attached: 1528647115596.jpg (1500x1378, 425K)

The costs, lawsuits and environmental regulations make it all but impossible now.

We prefer to use faster and cheaper planes when we travel in America. Thanks for trying.

Attached: accurate version.jpg (648x618, 149K)

having options is the hallmark of a developed country, plus your country can afford

Attached: Drive.png (1734x595, 525K)

That is a top of the line Indian Bio Fuel Train.

/thread

i love how that pic excludes anglostan

also pic related , instead of moving jews by train to get gassed israeli trains gas jews while transporting them

Attached: 5_l.jpg (458x300, 123K)

don't come to rapid we're full

Explain beneficial. I can understand a HSR between DC and NYC, but don't see the utility in say, Chicago-LA

The Russian picture does not correspond to reality. Such a train exists in a single copy, and this is a German train, Siemens. In the picture, reality is close to reality.

Attached: Без названия (21).jpg (259x194, 11K)

I don't want a fucking train I want a fucking hyperloop

I prefer the independence automobile ownership gives me. Besides, I love long road trips that let me see parts of the country I've never been to before.

Attached: 1459958622669.jpg (426x382, 18K)

Live in NJ, yep

Attached: Acela.png (1447x496, 190K)

>I WANT BETTER NIGGERTRAINS

Fixed it for you.

>tfw texas is actually getting a bullet train system from the japs

Attached: 1536302722702.png (483x581, 341K)

>Fuck other forms of transportation
I mean more just to connect the state together and then maybe start working on interstate HSR. This would grow our population, increase productivity, and if done right could be highly beneficial to the average Ameircan who doesn't want to drive for 40 hours from one corner to the other and instead can do it in half the time or even a 1/3

This.

Attached: Acela_Express_and_Metro-North_railcar.jpg (2272x1704, 720K)

That's where I'm from. Monmouth county

>russia
Yeah no

DC to NYC in 2 hrs, 45 minutes. Driving takes about 4.5 hours without traffic.

HSR here in Spain: Valencia to Madrid in 1 hr, 50minutes. I could drive it in 3.5 hours

This is what I want, not some bullshit train that we were already promised 20 years ago and the funding was rescinded in favor of more buses

t. Denver to Vail in 10 minutes vs 3 hours of driving

Attached: colorado_route_map.png (1080x1081, 516K)

There is a new one alreayx, but it will take about 20 years till it replaced all the older ones.
sueddeutsche.de/panorama/bahn-russland-schlafwagen-1.4222731

Middlesex here senpai

Yeah I want to ride that train so bad. Have to drive a bit to where the station is though.

>grug say US too big

Attached: f0e33dbf82d549a5bd433fe3.jpg (6886x5676, 1.37M)

Penn station has them pretty sure

>Europe will be 100 years behind us and they will never catch up because their roads are so poorly maintained
>implying America's roads aren't in terrible shape
Kek, do we need to start making /aic/ (America is collapsing) threads to show off our terrible roads? Trains are stupid and this thread was created by Jerry Brown but you are retarded if you don't think our roads are third world tier

>two-thirds (63 percent) of Americans are likely to use high-speed trains and this jumps to nearly seventy (67) percent
absolute state of trade magazine propaganda

Reminder that this is what train haters did

Attached: Painful.png (1700x1820, 3.45M)

Attached: artworks-000264318440-8wd1lx-t500x500.jpg (500x500, 33K)

Yes. Fuck trains. Tickets cost as much as plane tickets and it takes 4 times longer to get to your destination.

No, Providence stop is the closest to me I think. And even then it's a 35 minute drive.

Attached: 1280px-Acela_Express_business_class_coach.jpg (1280x960, 179K)

Retarded stoner detected

Manhattan is like 35min by takinfo Pulaski and Holland tunnel

Kek confirms

Attached: 1544237189168.jpg (750x483, 26K)

Yep

they've obviously been bought out by the powerful train lobby

It's no maglev so I assume it can get bumpy, no? Never been on train before they used to run through my area, now they just skip this route.

>Fuck improving any form of transportation except for cars!

/thread

People want free money as well, doesn't mean it's a good thing just because people want it.

There is a high speed train between LA and SF being built. No one will use it. There is already a rail from NYC to DC.

Haven't taken one yet

Attached: Acela_Regional_in_Boston_South_Station.jpg (1800x1200, 444K)

That German-like efficiency...

I'm an American living back and forth between Europe and the US. When I'm here in Europe I miss the space I have in the US, and that includes having my big, spacious American car without having to deal with public transport. Just a very American mindset. Don't know how you change that without forcing it on people.

just because other lobbying groups are more powerful doesn't mean there aren't billionaire parasites pushing for trains too

Checked. And yes the auto is king.

i took one from philly to DC and back, couldn't even read it was so bumpy but i think it's more an issue with the tracks

That drive is the same amount of miles as it would be from London to Georgia, going through Turkey.

Yeah reading up depends on the track you’re on, where they reach 150mph is only on three sections of track in those island and Massachusetts. Those are probably smooth.

>Public transportation
>With niggers
Soon the europeans will also lose their railways, and none of us will be around to say we told you so.

And less miles but 13 hours longer

Attached: Uk.png (1810x741, 1.05M)

Oops meant for

>tfw post on Jow Forums for a few years
>suddenly on the no-fly list
thanks alot faggots

Attached: 1466305304920.png (900x900, 51K)

>big corporations are more efficient and encourage competition!
retard, proponents of free markets are not generally corporatists
>no goobermit needed, let duh market dictate demand!
You realize demand for trains would be higher if the government didn't use military to protect oil trade routes or give subsidies
>durrrr government won't be susceptible to corruption or capture if we make it bigger, somehow it will just magically become better
>two million dollars is a fine price for a public restroom durr
pic related, it's your brain on socialism and big gov

Attached: 1542171831328.png (800x800, 84K)

got rid of a land intensive inefficient mode of transport in favor of more effective options?

>But at least make it as un-aerodynamic and inefficient as possible
neck yourself, shart

>Tibet getting a high speed rail
Well, that's that's going to be expensive.

Attached: girl.png (327x570, 131K)

high speed trains are used to travel long distances
why would an unemployed negro leave
town?

Yes, fuck trains in America. Other countries can afford to make high speed train networks because they have densely populated centers with many metropolises.

America meanwhile have little to nothing worthwhile in most of its continental landmass thus making high speed rail nationwide is a huge waste of resources. This is why America chose to greatly expand their national flight infrastructure instead of trains. Also we prefer to drive cars for moderate-length trips.

Attached: wowowo.jpg (960x768, 116K)

We can connect the east coast cities like Newark, Bangor and Charleston.
East coast is more tightly packed than middle America.

Korean high-speed train derails, injuring 15 yesterday.
>asia.nikkei.com/Location/East-Asia/South-Korea/High-speed-train-derails-in-South-Korea-injuring-15

Attached: 1124725.jpg (600x480, 346K)

We prefer proven equipment, not your irons.

Attached: Без названия (37).jpg (275x183, 9K)

Bingo

Attached: 1450059715793.jpg (786x800, 315K)

The western train routes in China do not make a profit and are heavily subsidized by the government. They were blatantly built for political reasons (send a message to the separatists that "we control you"). Also the rails are built to bring in a massive flood of Han Chinese immigrants to replace the native "troublesome" population.

youtube.com/watch?v=0JDoll8OEFE

In addition, China is forced to make an extensive line of railways only because they lack a world-class domestic flight infrastructure like America.

Thanks.

Attached: 1487617392760.jpg (1400x933, 344K)

Ouch imagine that tossing inside

Yes that's the reason why high speed rail networks are already built/planned in these areas.