Why do all economic indicators for regular people seem to go to shit after ~1980?

Why do all economic indicators for regular people seem to go to shit after ~1980?

Attached: productivityincome.jpg (1514x1213, 162K)

Attached: tuition cost and wages over time.jpg (736x386, 32K)

because God was born in the flesh in
1980.

Stock market became the basis of the economy and the china plan started in earnest?

That's when America started pushing international free trade

i guess that bullshit libertarianism doesn't actually work uh

Because cheap labour was introduced via globalism, open borders and free trade

>Stock market became the basis of the economy and the china plan started in earnest?

no, in the 80s productivity rose because of:
computers
increasingly automation

if you can produce more shit in less time, your productivity increases.
When you have robots/automated facilities that can work 24/7 with a single investment your productivity will go through the roof.

Financialization + unregulated mass migration

neo-liberalism

Prove it

DINGDINGDING

Attached: F54EA51F-C07B-4B3C-99FC-1B604A8A5774.jpg (173x200, 33K)

Reagan Thatcher and Mulroney waged war against western labour and it has never abated.
"conservatism" became harnessed by the elite donor class and now exists solely to enrich nationless conglomerates at the expense of the commons whenever possible.

because ronald wilson reagan and his billionaire buddies wanted more money, and guess who had to pay for that? the middle class plebs.

Neoliberalism.

The world will be a good day when all capitalists are shot in the face. Globalism must die for humanity to be free.

After the Gas Crisis in 1972 the government started fixing wages rather than the prices of goods. People are more likely to flip out over sharp spike in a commodity price rather than wages slowly losing out to inflation

I would argue that it was the result of Nixon taking the US off the gold standard in 1971, which is where the lines on your graph start diverging.

Globalization
Every emerging market began to catch up and they have benefited from wage growth while ours hasn't increased much. Not necessarily bad at all given that strong middle classes abroad are good for developed countries as well. It's a matter of letting others catch up and then grow as one block. Internationalization is the only way, you backward fucks

>free trade
L0Lno fgt pls

It's because of hart celler, obviously.

More woman and minorities in the workplace increased the supply of labor thus decreasing its cost

Ronnie Raygun decoupling wages from productivity

Cause baby boomers took control of society starting in 1980

At this point people who go to college can't blame anybody else. You can teach yourself through the internet better than any university could. You have access to the smartest minds with one mouse click. for free.

"Then the presentation began to get rather grim, because once that generation passed, and that would be in the late 80's and early 90's where we are now, most of that group would be gone and then gradually things would tighten up and the tightening up would be accelerated. The old movies and old songs would be withdrawn, the gentler entertainment would be withdrawn."

reagan and thatcher
they made a faustian deal, chasing short term gains at long term pay offs.

>he doesn't understand that university has always been a social club
>if you don't bump bows with the upper class during uni, you'll always stay in your lane
>it's not what you know it's who you know

End of the gold standard

nailed it

reagan

I guess I will figure it out on my own if this club of faggots is necessary to over perform in live.

amnesty

jews

Boils down to this
Jews, access to cheap labor in the Third World and outsourcing our manufacturing sector, a 'look-the-other-way' policy of importing illegal immigrants and paying them slave wages, and increased automation.

The fundamental source of crisis is the diminishing vitality of White economies spanning the last 40 year business cycle, a result of sending White industries to Yellows/Browns

As a result of offshoring White industries, the West experienced Rust Belt, stagnation, and was thrust into a depressionary period known as the "Long downturn". The long-term weakness of capital accumulation and of aggregate demand was rooted in the declining profitability of capital, stemming from an oversupply in global manufacturing-- a direct result of transferring White industries to Asia and Latinos. White industries that were once solely based in the West, were transferred to agrarian, primitive races, who never reached industrialization on their own. White industries were copied throughout the 3rd world which resulted in severe excess in production, due to uncontrolled, exponential population growth of the primitive 3rd world

The offshoring of White industry to Asia coordinated with the severing of the post-war Bretton Woods monetary system in 1971 signalled the profitability crisis of industrial capitalism’s Fordist ruling contract was coming under acute stress. Neoliberal geopolitical shifts to Asia, unfettered by race realism and buoyed by military-industrial expansion, White capital, from your private bank accounts, began to colonise Asia

The 1980s ushered in more globalism by White nations to combat the ongoing turmoil of stagflation, resulting from offshoring White industries. Governments pushed deindustrialisation, higher unemployment, White population reduction, suicides, homosexuality, mass migration, demographic replacement, and austerity measures, as they sought to alleviate the globalist crisis by resorting to greater borrowing and subsidising demand of offshored products. However, stagnation intensified and debt escalated, and a wave of devastating socio-economic crises rocked White nations throughout the following 3 decades

Around the late 70s and early 80s (when wages and productivity truly diverge), “Reagnomics” (tax cuts, deregulation, financialization, union breaking, offshoring, mass migration, demographic replacement, commoditization of labor) was implemented in the US It was so successful for our oligarchs that other Anglo&Euro nations followed our example. Decades of these policies have enriched bankers and executives, while impoverishing goyim

Combine financialization, neoliberalism and moral bankruptcy, and you end up with predatory, parasitic elites.

We're in the endgame of financialization and globalization, and it won't be pretty for all
Our system is totally dependent on soaring speculative bubbles fueled by mass migration ponzis

The origins of the crisis are rooted in the mid60s and early 1970s, when globalists started offshoring White industries to primitive shitskins and put an end to the gold standard. It marked the beginning of a new regime of outsourcing, mass migration, demographic replacement, and floating exchange rates. The sweeping reforms brought in under the Thatcher/Reagan governments accelerated a wave of unemployment, mass migration, suicides, austerity and privatisation, with removal of protective barriers against the locust hordes

This genocidal agenda was pushed aggressively by globalists in White countries, while being imposed on many shitskin countries through the IMF and World Bank’s infamous ‘structural adjustment programmes’. A legion of books have examined the disastrous consequences of this market-led approach to monetary, demographic, and fiscal policy, derisorily labelled the neoliberal Washington Consensus. As governments increasingly focused on maintaining demographic replacement, high unemployment, and removing regulations on corporations and invaders, the world of speculative ponzi finance (financialisation) boomed—and the quicksand foundations were laid for a dramatic collapse in 2008.

The term ‘financialisation’ has become a buzzword to explain the factors which precipitated these events, referring to the vastly expanded role of offshoring, open borders and financial markets in the operation of domestic and global economies. It is not only about the growth of big banks and hedge funds, but the radical transformation of our entire society that has taken place as a result of the increasing dominance of the financial sector with its short-termist, profitmaking logic.

NAFTA

Globalists sent our industries overseas and replaced our real economy with bubble ponzi schemes.
After tech bubble 1 popped, the Fed blew housing bubble 2. Then, after bubble 2 popped, the Fed blew bubble 3, the current “everything” bubble. Why do they do this, even though they know (but won’t admit they know) that bubbles ALWAYS pop, and outcomes are ALWAYS extremely nasty?
Because bubbles prevent White family formation and the crashes cause suicide/homeless/opioid epidemics

The “wealth effect” is supposed to ameliorate the fact that goyim are broke as a result of industrial transfer to Asia by the banking cartel and the Fed, which is the head of said cartel, whilst they’re in the process of picking your pockets.

The same issue is at play with student loans. Hey, it keeps White goyim from having babies and forces them into homosex, instead of protesting, or something worse.

The financialization of the US economy is a pathological (read abnormal) state of affairs. This in NOT your run-of-the mill economy. Thanks to our world-class education system, including “common core” and other dumbing-down progressive policies, most people don’t have the slightest clue that they’re being taken to the cleaners, hoodwinked, shafted, schlonged...

Since the Fed and their cronies are a one-trick pony, expect more of the same when bubble 3.0 pops. Only this time around, the Fed’s out of ammo, and so that civil unrest thing, along with a generous helping of that pesky 2nd Amendment (hey, the Fed may not have any, but we the people have ammo), might make things a little more “interesting”.

The bottom line is that the Fed is well underway in the process of destroying the economic system of this country, and by doing so the White nation itself. This is the grand plan of the progressive agenda. Until the goyim rise up and take arms, things aren’t going to get better any time soon

Two words.
Reagan Revolution

think about it bruder.

they tell us the narrative of self-made man, from humble origins, but the story has two interpretations.

If you're lower class it's that anyone can make it up if they try hard enough and are in the right place at the right time. If you're upper class it's that every now again, you've got to let someone else up into your echelon, even if they don't seem like they come from the right cloth.

You've also got to think about, that of all the people in the upper class, do you think most of them made it there by hardwork, effort, and merit alone? If that was true, the people that do fit that narrative wouldn't be so outstanding and noteworthy. They wouldn't be carting around people like Angela as a mascot. She became the poster child to hide all the layers of nepotism that exists in their club.

It is now clear that financial crises are not discrete events but are linked phenomena that have been unleashed on the globe ever since offshoring White industries starting in the 70s. By transferring industries overseas, the West propped its dead real economy with a financialization-based ponzi economy, with financial markets liberalized during the Reagan-Thatcher era in the early 1980s.

To take just the 3 most prominent crashes, surplus capital that could not find profitable domestic outlets after the Japanese bubble burst in the late 1980s found its way as speculative capital into Southeast Asia, where it contributed to the Asian financial crisis in 1997-98. The Asian crisis, in turn, helped generate Wall Street’s Tech crash in 2000 and implosion in 2008, owing to the Asian countries’ channeling the financial reserves they had accumulated to protect them from a repeat of 1997 into the US — where they helped fuel the subprime real estate boom.