Was does every country in Europe have growing nationalist movements but the USA doesn't...

Was does every country in Europe have growing nationalist movements but the USA doesn't? American nationalist movements can't accomplish shit even though we have free speech. The best we did was cville with like 500 people then it all when to shit. Germany, France, Austria not to mention every Eastern European country and even fucking Sweden have had massive nationist marches, have nationists in there government and have seen there right-wing movements grow in spite of Antifa and "hate speech" laws. Not trying to black pill just trying to learn.

Attached: 1492823500288.png (2000x1300, 96K)

We do you moron, it's why Trump is in office right now. However, unlike european governments, the US government is not designed to function properly. The founders built it from the ground up to make sure that it would get as little as possible done except when absolutely necessary. So it is much harder for any one person (Trump) to get anything done, and takes longer for large scale change to occur.

Because a nation is a people and America is 40% non-american.

this also

i never thought of it like that huh

Yeah I agree with your other statement. Unfortunately I see no way this country can be salvaged. Best case scenario is a racial civil war.

No American really seems to be able to explain to me what a "white nationalist" movement would be fighting for. Your culture is comprised of foul language, McDonald's hamburgers and transgender toilets. I can't think of anything uniquely "American" except perhaps being as vulgar and loudmouthed as possible and worshipping firearms.

Attached: nope.png (625x626, 32K)

That was the point. The founders built a city in a literal swamp and sent all the politicians there to chew on each other while the rest of the country went about its business. Unfortunately, even slow growing cancers can kill you. And we're getting to that point. Luckily, we have guns.

If pic related doesn't scream incipient race war, I don't know what does.

Attached: 1544149441698.png (1042x665, 30K)

Ok but the UK also has no real nationist sense as well. Should I assume its for the same reason?

Oh it's coming. I personally believe that we will be in full blow racial civil war by 2030 at the latest.

Fingers crossed. I'm not worried.

Attached: 1541269496283.jpg (1200x1933, 319K)

We don't need some faggy little "movement" when we've already got the real thing.

Attached: Donald_Trump_Pentagon_2017.jpg (732x1008, 486K)

Because we have nationalist politicians in office stupid.

Attached: lol_wut.jpg (449x500, 35K)

> we have free speech
No we don't.

Look I want shit to change to but a bloody war in which millions of whites die seems like a bad solution. I think peaceful separation and session would probably work better for all parties involved.

Yeah those were men not onions boys which is what most white men are. Hell I'm even a onions boy, my father is almost sixty and can out bench me. I'm not saying we're going to loose I just think it will be much harder than you think.

> I think peaceful separation and session would probably work better for all parties involved.
I believe this too, but the shitskins and niggers don't. Here's the thing, they will literally never stop chasing us down. They are parasites they can't create functioning societies so they will try to invade white or Asian societies. Asian societies are smart and tell them to fuck off. We don't.

Peace is always better than war. But that's the thing about war, you don't get a choice.

Get out, start lifting, and start shooting. I'm a god damned surgeon with my rifles. You should be too.

I know. I'm trying but it's pretty hard since I work and go to university (I know it's a liberal cesspool but I need the CIS degree)

What the fuck are you talking about you retard, what do you think Trump's popularity and movement represents?

America has always been nationalist. We didn't need a movement for it.

I'm in a similar situation just started at uni. I wonder just how many of us there are hiding our power levels. Only real indication is the number of swastikas I see carved in the stalls in the restroom.

we drive on the right side, you drive on the wrong side.

America always been genetic trashcan. There is no nation to be nationalist about.

You'd be surprised. I heard some girl in CALIFORNIA listening to 'crusader metal' which prompted me to start testing the political waters talk with her. Turns out she's pretty red, not Jow Forums level but still pretty right leaning.

STFU communist

The issue with trumps brand of nationalism is that its civic with minor hints of white identity. Also, the fact that he's tied to the GOP effectively means that once he's out of office shit goes back to normal. If he had his own party or could fundamentally alter the composition of GOP politicians we could make some lasting progress.

NASCAR

I think America does. But I would still say that American identity is half finished. Most Europeans can trace their culture and people, when Americans do same they trace it outside of America. But USA was created to be middlefinger to European powers, which just creates mess, and bunch of burgers trying to larp as Europeans.

Attached: 1544105522518.jpg (508x700, 279K)

Yeah, I saw a blonde wearing a shirt with a Teutonic cross on it. Not sure what the symbolic significance is to her though could just be fashion.

Anglos still believe in their institutions. Trump and Brexit will save everything (somehow).

Because they don't like Nationalism, here in PR we had nationalism. Pedro Albizu Campos was a traditionalist catholic nationalist that wanted to get (((Them))) out. What happened to that tho? (((They))) infiltrated the movement, others showed their true colors at the right time and the movement died, both tanks to the spies and the (((US))) government who backed a socialist commie Lenin wannabe and called every single nationalist in PR a communist even tho the reality was completely different. The US people would have had no obligations with PR if the 1948 elections went the course they where predicted to go, full independence with not a single dime asked of the US.

Why there isnt american nationalism? Mayby becouse there is no such a thing as american nation, your country was built upon Civic nationalism

I was wondering if finish nationalism has fallen in the past few years? I noticed the true Finns were trailing in recent polls.

Did you ask her about it? A quick "Hey nice shirt," is a great way to start an introduction.

I don't which America you've been living in, but everyone I know and even the neighbors I don't has an American flag on their house or on a pole in their yard. And I live in a liberal shithole of a city. I'd assume the rest of the country is probably even more patriotic/nationalist

It just seems like we are literally going to be based in 2 years or so because of the liberal media over exaggerating it. There is some rise but it's not something big.

>Civic
All legal immigration prior to 1952 with few exceptions was white. Our first naturalization act specified "white men of good character"

You had your nazi party but you threw it away retards

Attached: 1533482952108.jpg (590x810, 99K)

Trump's civic nationalism is the best you're going to get until we get closer to 50/50. But even then it's not terrible considering the vast majority of people who are "civically" american (IE subscribe to fundamental american values) are white.

Your understanding of the party situation is fundamentally flawed. The GOP of today is not the GOP of 10 years ago, it is undergoing a fundamental shift. This happens about every 80 years or so. Recall the democrats were the party of state's rights during the civil war. Trump's hijacking of the party was the catalyst that will see the GOP converted to an explicitly populist nationalist (and implicitly white) party. Look at all the republicans that refused to run for re-election in the mid terms. Look at the new republicans running on Trump's platform. Look at kikes like John McCain dying off.

For all intents and purposes, the GOP is already the white party vs the democrat's diversity alliance. There is no going back to interventionist neoconservatism. Not after Trump. Even the democrats are moving towards populism to some extent (sanders, cortez, etc). It's just that their's is brown populism.

White isn't a nation.

Attached: 1534221234603.jpg (960x600, 69K)

Didn't get the chance cause I was running late for class. Still, hope it was more than just fashion.

White isnt a nation retard

what are you talking about, I'm 1/64th Cherokee, I can trace my roots to America.

Attached: 1HZYhbv.png (264x320, 23K)

>I noticed the true Finns were trailing in recent polls
Their old party leader sold out and lost half of their supporters. Then he jumped ship and created a new party which polls at 1%. Absolute piece of trash.

Attached: 1544220423300.png (800x1000, 396K)

>For all intents and purposes, the GOP is already the white party vs the democrat's diversity alliance.
This. So much this, whites are slowly starting to get politically and ideologically united. This is wonderful as once the race war starts the 'white tribe' won't have as many traitors in it as it does now.

You may have a point. I'm hopeful that the GOP can remove the old guard neocons in the coming years. Hopefully, the populism in the democratic party will cause some instability in there ranks as well.

perceived diversity.

America has the highest amount of diversity, so outgroups are an easy source of ire as opposed to elites

think of it as a water pipe with a leak. It can function, but never as efficiently as a pipe without a leak

One can hope. Then again most women wouldn't now loyalty, honor, or tradition if it slapped them on the head.

Rifle surgeon reporting in.

Attached: 51905-1.jpg (1884x1383, 518K)

test

I'm aware but white also isn't "civic". Racial nationalism is the most local form of nationalism for a country like the USA.

True but it think it may just be in their nature to passively side with the establishment in power. Pretty much all revolutions are fought by men.

>local
*logical

This is probably how the American race war is gonna be started
>Nationalist take over European countries.
>They start deporting non-whites in mass.
>Lefties demand intervention to protect Muhammad right to rape 8 year old girls.
>Either the current president is secretly pro-white and rejects intervening which causes the lefties to declare a civil war.
>Or governemnt does intervene and starts slaughtering whites in Europe and most likely American will wake the fuck up.

That's what I like to see user.

And it is what we have. As long as American values are primarily "white" values (industriousness, liberty, independence, privacy, competition, etc), American nationalism is white nationalism. Why do you think CNN and other leftists are so afraid of the term?

This is exactly correct my fellow burger. Women obey power above all else. It's why the dems have used them to explode the size of our government. The only way to fix it is to take women's so called 'rights' away including their voting 'rights.'

delete this dillusionary abomination of a flag
that canton is a fucking doscrgace to our nation
no self respecting nationalist would touch it

>I was wondering if finish nationalism has fallen in the past few years?
It hasn't, but True Finns party has some upheaval inside it, party splitted in two when Halla-aho was to become party leader.
I mainly mean America is created upon liberal and enlightenment values. Europe was created by monarchy and church. My problem is people in America that try to larp as Europeans, Americanism is cancer in Europe and vice versa.

Attached: 1457208237386.jpg (594x932, 136K)

>faggot flag
Faggot OP
We have nationalism, it's called patriotism, and it's about setting your country on the right path when it's wrong, and keeping it on the right path when it's correct, not blind loyalty to one party or person.

only stormfags who havrnt step foot outside of their home believe niggers arnt fellow ameicans

I can't think of a more nationalist movement then basically ending NATO... Just saying...

If they were, we wouldn't call them "african-americans"

Attached: abraham-lincoln-551194.jpg (640x820, 124K)

>so called 'rights' away including their voting 'rights.'

In a better world, those rights would be restricted by more than just sex. Personally, I also liked the idea of land ownership as a requirement like we had originally.

ETHNIC nationalism is the strongest form of nationalism. Even look at Israel. The USA cannot have true nationalism, we are an ethnic mess.

Attached: 64165415314616.jpg (398x375, 59K)

YES YES YES! Absoultely! I agree, though for me I like the idea of it being restricted to being a Net Tax Payer or serving in the military. I go back and forth on land ownership because major corps could buy up a bunch of land or change the laws to make it extremely hard to purchase property.

we call then niggers
niggers will die for our country
niggers want whats best for their community and country
niggers realize whats wrong with niggers
niggers are american
stormfags are plants

Owning land is not indicative of civic virtue or social responsibility. I would remind you that enfranchised land owners put us in the position we are in today. If you want a successful, lasting nation-state, you give the right to vote and hold office only to veterans. People who have demonstrated a willingness to put the interests of their nation ahead of their own.

Because it's not that bad here yet.
It's getting close, but it's not nearly bad enough.
We have a lot of things Europeans are jealous of.

In France life in Paris is awful compared to your average city in the U.S. On top of it you are getting taxed twice as much.
In the UK people literally get arrested for twitter banter, and have to show I.D to buy silverware. Not even to mention all the licenses.

Take away our free speech (it's already being done through the big tech hydra), and taking away our guns would be the straw that broke the camels back.
It hasn't happened yet so people aren't rising up.

shit, 3 off from a hell of a get

You don't have a culture or an identity. You're an island controlled by corporations who hate you.

Ehh if it's ONLY in the hands of military minded men you get Julius Caesers. I think letting Net Tax Payers (those who pay for their vote in money) and Military Servicemen (those who pay for their vote in blood) vote you get a nice mixture of military and peace.

>look i posted nearly the same thing in a third thread today!
fuck bong dont you have anything better to do?

CVille was legendary though. We had at least 1000

You make some good points, in a modern context, I should probably be one of a few requirements which would show intelligence, output or loyalty

>Net Tax Payer or serving in the military.
These would work well

>because of major corps
Supervision by corporations and or foreign powers and also another (((factor))) which relates to the other two should be taken into account

The internet your posting on is uniquely American.
In fact American culture is so widespread it has bled it's way into every single place on this planet (Except the Sentinelese people bless their hearts).
The movies you watch, the music you listen to, and most modern day comforts you can think of are all American culture.
You're welcome you nonce.

>You don't have a culture or an identity. You're island controlled by corporations who hate you.

You know the same could be said for us?

based and redpilled

t. an island the size of michigan

What is your culture again?

So you'd have a disproportionate amount of power willingly assigned to the (((rich)))?

itt butthurt amerifats defending their jewish african mongrel """culture"""

Attached: gl.png (388x421, 226K)

>Supervision
*Subversion

True in a perfect world we'd have very VERY strict laws governing business. The end result of pure capitalism is Monopoly. We need business like Disney to get their teeth kicked in. Hell disney literally just became a monopoly by buying fox and the gov did nothing.

European immigration and trade, freedom of association, freedom of speech, right to overthrow genocidal tyrants by means of militia composed of armed citizens.

Ahh yes because 2% of the population could outvote at LEAST 40%

didn't Poland get like 80,000 during their independence march? Even Germany got like 10,000 a few months ago.

Julius Caesar was a dictator, not a democratically elected leader. You and I are both seeking to restrict the franchise, not remove it entirely. But having money is not, inherently, an indication of one's willingness to preserve, protect, and defend a nation. If votes are to be bought, what is to stop George Soros, or other rootless, ultra rich oligarchs, from employing people as vote farms? Civillians should be free to live and to work. But the right to make decisions on behalf of a nation state, the right to exercise force (voting is little more than civilized violence), must be restricted to those who are willing and able to put the good of the nation ahead of the good of themselves.

Read your Spengler. In the end, all conflict ends in a war between money and blood. If you want your nation to survive, blood must win.

Someone post the swedish movie about the swede getting fucked in the ass by a refugee with a stolen strap on.

What is to stop them from giving some of their money to the other 58% on a contractual basis provided they vote the way they're told?

Caesar was elected to his positions and then got screwed by the (((senate))) so he took matters into his own hands.

What do you think Trump rallies are?

Because you would have to be a Net Tax Payer. I.E you are paying more in Taxes than you are recieving in benefits. So let's say Soros gives the shitskins and niggers a bunch of money under the table. They still aren't net tax payers, they wouldn't(couldn't) report and would just pocket it so they could keep getting welfare.

entry for Jow Forums discord

Attached: no_rights.jpg (800x1000, 190K)

Attached: im-sorry-i-cant-hear-you-over-the-sound-of-freedom-ringing.jpg (400x400, 112K)

Exactly. He took power because he could, and because no one was there to stop him. That's very different than a democracy limited to those who have served their nation.

It doesn't have to be under the table. I could enter into a contract with you paying you such that your taxes would amount to $1 more than you receive in benefits each year. Your job description would be "Vote left".

Just wait until Trump gets screwed by the (((senate))) too.

>VERY strict laws governing business. The end result of pure capitalism is Monopoly.

I agree, for the most part, however, I do believe that the entrepreneurial spirit is something that must be preserved and allowed to flourish since it seems to be something whites are really good at. Of course, anything done at the expense of the state or the race should be annihilated.

>We need business like Disney to get their teeth kicked in.

Something tells me even old Walt might agree with you. He was pretty based and might not be so happy with what the company is doing today.

Attached: xjeZIdk.jpg (326x320, 49K)

Yeah that would be beyond insane to allow.

Attached: gyZY2VT.jpg (720x510, 64K)

True, everyone should be given a shot to make it big but I worry about corporate oligarchy. I mean that's what the '''globalists''' are. Yeah Walt would probably burn modern Disney to the ground if he was still alive to see what it had become.