The Spanish had the greatest empire

Prove me wrong.

Attached: Juan_Manuel_de_Rosas_by_Norris.jpg (768x944, 103K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Americans#Admixture_in_Non-Hispanic_Whites
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexicans
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Guiana
twitter.com/AnonBabble

murica is best.
Trump is my god!
yeee hawwwww

Sure, if you count race mixing with beaners as an accomplishment.

They have the best ex-colonies on average.
Meanwhile, 90% of ex-British colonies are shitholes, except for the four ones in which they replaced locals with whites

Attached: 1504836334215.png (2684x1252, 149K)

it's called racial haircy you filthy ango. Your government literally tried to genocide the abos by breeding them into the anglo population. No doubt why your IQ is so low now in Australia.

>non-white shithole
>great

Reminder that the US was 90%+ white at its peak

Latin America never got close to that.

Attached: yPov2.gif (1000x677, 759K)

>They have the best ex-colonies on average.
Take that shit back i-it's nor our fault zim is a shithole

Attached: Remember Rhodesia.jpg (780x438, 101K)

Juan Manuel de Rosas was an Indio-loving cuck

Australia was like 95%+ white at its peak

Latin America never got even close to that. Whites have always been a minority living in a majority mixed race shithole.


>hurr muh hierarchy

Who cares? You are still forced to live around niggers and mestizos. White supremacy has always been retarded, white nationalism is the only way to go.

Attached: Australian_states_history.gif (220x205, 140K)

Needlessly murdering millions of people is not moral. Spanish colonialism uplifted people.

The population crashed due to disease all Spain had to do was put the non-whites on reservations and give them casinos and listerine to make them go away.

Instead they bred with them like retards and created a giant shitskin population that turned all of Latin America into a shithole. All white people in the Americas are now threatened because of how retarded Catholics are and how much they desired to race mix. Disgusting.

Attached: art-eid432138.fig1.gif (400x326, 13K)

Rosas wasn't even spanish

>turned all of Latin America into a shithole

What exactly was it before the spanish arrived with natives squatting in the jungle?

You are vastly overestimate the amount of race mixing that went on. Every single short brown mexican you have seen is pure native not mixed at all.

>pure native
Nah more like mongrels mixed with slaves or at least in central america

Perhaps in brazil. Spanish only used native slave unless there was none.

Most of spanish central and south america had much less black slaves than the USA

You what mate

You vastly underestimate the amount of race mixing. Most populations in Mexico average anywhere from 50-75% "native" Indio genes. There are countries in Latin America with barely any European influence especially in Central America. Mexico is one of the most race mixed countries on the planet.

Attached: AUHehhS.png (1480x1401, 765K)

that genetic study doesn't say anything about how mixed people are.

>how mixed people are

That's exactly what it shows. Basically all of Mexico is mixed aside from maybe the upper- upper middle class. Besides that it is a total race mixed shithole.

Attached: 1920px-Geographic_ancestry_distribution_of_Mexico.png (1920x449, 281K)

Attached: Genetic_variation_of_mestizo_populations_in_Latin_America.png (838x341, 32K)

Do you have some of these for the USA in order to compare? Are you saying Anglos never race mixed?

>White Americans (European Americans) on average are: "98.6 percent European, 0.19 percent African and 0.18 percent Native American." Inferred British/Irish ancestry is found in European Americans from all states at mean proportions of above 20%, and represents a majority of ancestry, above 50% mean proportion, in states such as Mississippi, Arkansas, and Tennessee. Scandinavian ancestry in European Americans is highly localized; most states show only trace mean proportions of Scandinavian ancestry, while it comprises a significant proportion, upwards of 10%, of ancestry in European Americans from Minnesota and the Dakotas.[82][83]

It's not even close

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Americans#Admixture_in_Non-Hispanic_Whites

Meanwhile in Mexico

>An autosomal genetic study which included the states of Mexico, Morelos, Puebla, Queretaro and Mexico City determined the average ancestry of the central region of Mexico to be 52% European 39% Amerindian, and 9% African.[115]

>An autosomal study performed in Mestizos from Mexico's three largest cities reported that Mestizos from Mexico city had an average ancestry of 50% European, 1% African and 49% Amerindian whereas Mestizos from the cities of Monterrey and Guadalajara had both a European ancestry of 60% and an indigenous ancestry of 40% in average.[112]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexicans

Of course with mass immigration America is becoming a mixed race shithole, but that is a more recent phenomenon.

Attached: Trivariate_histograms_for_African%2C_Native_American_and_European_ancestry_for_Mexicans.png (702x785, 32K)

You realize the british acutely did have south american colony? They ran it to the ground harder than any spanish colony.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Guiana