Tfw think communist economics makes much more sense than capitalist economics, but also want to maintain nationalism

>tfw think communist economics makes much more sense than capitalist economics, but also want to maintain nationalism
wat do?

Attached: 802B6AE5-7103-45A5-9ADB-BAB3CA96FCD4.jpg (707x449, 44K)

Read siege asshole

>National Bolshevism
>National Socialism
That wasn't hard.

Full-blown communism is worse than NatSoc tho.

You should probably just kill yourself.

Psst, hey kid.

Ever hear of NazBol?

Attached: NAZBOL DOGS.jpg (1280x800, 45K)

read micoreconomic theory by mac-colell

oh and and read siege faggot

>communist economics
>communist
>economics

Attached: 1541401831914.png (399x712, 408K)

Read some economics textbooks you moron. Labor theory of value has failed so bad that it's incontrovertiblely wrong.

>think communist economics makes much more sense than capitalist economics
>wat do?
Read a books that actually inform you.

Attached: gegF2.jpg (738x863, 204K)

perhaps immigrate to china, you'll be very happy there

>labor theory
>economics
Chuckled

Change your flag

What communist economics are you speaking about tough?

Explain Marx's theory of value.

I guarantee whatever you say is going to be wrong.

>left libertarian
oxymoronic term, doesnt exist

Hmm it sounds to me like the solution is some kind of socialistic nationalism, or some kind of "national socialism" perhaps? What a curious idea...

explain further OP, there's no empirical evidence that supports your claim an the reason is very simple, communist objectives and implementations can only lead to ruin.
A system that vilanizes individuality and individual growth cannot survive as it produces a stagnant society.

National Socialism vs. (((Free Market Judeo-Capitalism)))
Libertarians are jew slaves
Neo-cons are jew slaves
Fascism has its roots in socialism because it's truly a 3rd way, the final evolution of socialism, due to socialism only being able to succeed in a homogeneous and united society

google entropy
get fucked

They make sense in a treatment to people sort of way.
As for how it actually functions, communism doesn't do that part.
Supply and demand determine prices and availability and there's nothing that anyone can do about it.
Find the magic tree that grows everything and it may work.

Based

I hate to tell you, but if you think communism makes sense, you're fucking mentally retarded.

Attached: 1493075521795.jpg (693x722, 66K)

Points

Don't you have to explain it ?

They want to build a newer fairer system that trades with the world, protects the workers of the nation by limiting immigration and ensuring white jobseekers and benefits claimants are influenced and supported to take these jobs that 'native people can't do'.

Protect the bosses and the innovators, the wealth creators by giving them a stake in Britain, patriotism use to be our biggest asset and we must make the wealth creators respect their workers as their fellow citizens.

All citizens working towards the new stronger nation which promotes and invests in its national industry and doesn't sell out to globalist corporations.

Where all public services are for the benefit of the indigenous peoples, a flat tax of 30% everything else is for you to take home to raise your white family.

Communism isn't an economic system. It's literally is just the abolition of private property rights. It does affect the economy yes but it in no way is an economic system itself. If anything, it's the destruction of an economic system :^)

>Uses Aggie pic
>Does not post feetz or armpits
Why are you doing this?

What about when most jobs are automated or require no effort? What if the super wealthy who own the robots don't wanna give up the gibs and just wanna kill everyone except 100,000 people on earth?

>communist economics
>theres no money and everyone only takes what they need because of the honor system
how do it make sense?

Daily reminder that I need to finish reading Siege. Thanks, user.

The nodes on these

Attached: 1543264415184.png (563x768, 447K)

>tfw think communist economics makes much more sense than capitalist economics

You should probably stay away from economics then.

Attached: v1kiz.jpg (222x225, 16K)

>explain this nebulous concept that kike academics have been refining and rewriting for well over 100 years
Nah lol
Not even gonna entertain Marxists anymore. Enjoy oblivion

Why? I'm not a Marxist and I'm not in here trying to propagate Marxism because my knowledge of Marxist economics is far from complete and I have a lot more reading to do if I'm to decide I'm for or against it.

What I'm interested in is if user can explain it and identify the problems he sees in it because there's a glut of idiots online making this exact claim without any argument because they have read zero Marx and just regurgitate whatever they hear on the internet.

Go to /leftshitpol/ with all the other nazbol retards who are communists in all but name

>explain this nebulous concept that kike academics have been refining and rewriting for well over 100 years
Translation.
>I don't understand this idea but I don't like it for reasons I don't fully understand either and I wish academia only reaffirmed my unfounded prejudices.

MIR SULTAN GALIEV ... contra LENIN, STALIN.

you think communist economies make sense? hahahahaha.

sense is not derived from contriving of a system that could work - its derived from the explaining of a system that already does work because it is emergent

Third-way economics of which there are many

So many assumptions in so few words
Embarrassing

Attached: jpg778h.jpg (628x682, 134K)

>what will we do when there is no longer need for sewing women or men to harvest the fields by hand? I sayeth damn this here steam machine, it will take our jerbs
t. 17th century farmer

This unironically

...but under fascism there are bosses and the population is unarmed, and under communism there are no bosses and every man has a rifle.

Unironically based and tedpilled.

Attached: vargmatches.jpg (460x689, 34K)

Attached: third position.jpg (762x1024, 253K)

nazibol gang