Our founding fathers wanted US to live in multiracial and multicultural country

They why could only white men vote?

Oh yeah, because they weren't dumb and wanted the country to be successful...

It doesn't matter what they wanted, the system they designed, which is in fact the worst form of government in all human history, inevitably led to our current state of affairs. The US Constitution basically outlines a form of government in which a woke oligarchy oppresses the masses and tells them they wanted it all along.

Literally the first law passed by Congress said that only whites could become naturalized citizens, so I'm going with no.

kill yourself Chomsky

>inevitably led to our current state of affairs
Its not because of constitution tho its because of (((certain))) ideologies that govern over it

Jefferson wanted to be able to come out with his jungle fever. That's why he pushed for these things. Nobody else gave a shit.

How did that come into effect? Oh wait, we got a bunch of woke justices on the Court who declared that it had a new meaning.

>(((woke)))

>United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization” (March 26, 1790).

>Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court that he is a person of good character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law to support the Constitution of the United States, which Oath or Affirmation such Court shall administer, and the Clerk of such Court shall record such Application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States. And the children of such person so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Provided also, that no person heretofore proscribed by any States, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an Act of the Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed.

Jefferson thought we could not coexist with free blacks. He wanted them to be freed by buying them out from their owners at a fixed price, but he also wanted them to be shipped back to the Dominican Republic where they could have their own country.

Spoiler: He was right.

>Jefferson proposed that African-American children born in America be bought by the federal government for $12.50 and that these slaves be sent to Santo Domingo

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Jefferson_and_slavery

Attached: Official_Presidential_portrait_of_Thomas_Jefferson_(by_Rembrandt_Peale,_1800)(cropped).jpg (732x900, 225K)

Attached: 1507342346012.png (1240x1870, 3.48M)

I am sorry to ask user but are those real quotes? can you give me sources for each of those ?

Great fucking picture

use google ya fag

Masonic British Protestant cocksuckers

You’re alright for an American.

> inevitably led to our current state of affairs
wow, because you have a time machine and tried everything?

That’s not an argument. It is in the nature of republics to keep expanding suffrage, and this is where that has brought you today.

Who gives a shit? Whether or not they hated niggers, they were fucking degenerate brainlet republican assholes.

Why do you care? Why let the past govern the present?

Here's a great quote from someone who agrees with you on the nature of judicial review.
>You seem ... to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps. ... Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves.
It's too bad we didn't have someone like this around when they were writing the Constitution.

Agreed. Washington was a vile man and the ideals of the enlightenment/the Freemasons are contemptible at best and utterly civilization-destructing at worst.

>founding fathers are based and redpilled, white is right and fuck niggers
>america was destined to fall like rome from the start, because of our founding fathers

Has someone made both of these non-contradictory statements? I don’t see anyone.

because the past system had effective ideals now we we did fuck it up by not following it I believe we shifted away from it radically and I am trying to figure it out what is it that cause the fuck up was it letting shitskins invade out country or was it letting women vote?

so open mindedness and freedom to question doesn't suite you what are you suggesting instead? muh God did it argument?

>blank slate
>effective ideal

>all men being equal
>effective ideal

>republicanism
>effective ideal
Pick only one out of each category.

Attached: 1BEA7EBD-773A-46E1-8F40-968BE5015674.jpg (480x360, 21K)

Imperial rule by a philosopher Emperor is what I propose, and none of that “enlightened” shit.

Attached: AA4428E6-49F4-4202-98EA-D697EE105ED4.jpg (800x965, 189K)

>>blank slate
I don't believe it applies to everybody but it does apply in some cases

>>all men being equal
maybe Jefferson didn't mean niggers
>>republicanism
its a perfect mixture of ancient athenian democracy and spartan oligarchy

what would you suggest?

redpill me on it

Biology has proven the blank slate to be an utter lie. Genes affect behavior and cognitive ability, period.
>maybe Jefferson didn't mean niggers
Even if he didn’t (clearly he did, otherwise he would have to be a genuine retard to fail at such a simple syllogism), equality is nothing to strive for. Hierarchies are natural and organic to man and we have never ever been truly equal in any society, or even biologically speaking. It is a completely ungodly and unnatural construct.
>its a perfect mixture of ancient athenian democracy and spartan oligarchy
If it was “perfect”, it never would’ve led to what we have today, given that it basically took over most of the “Western” world post-WW1.
>what would you suggest?
See my previous post.

They only considered white
Males with property human

m.youtube.com/watch?v=GMieHgRG_MU&t=2s

Read Plato’s Republic. Ironically enough, his ideal form of government is a monarchy despite the translation of the original title.

will we have free speech?Freedom to question? right to self preservation in your implied political theory? What will the owning of property be like?

ok

Under the rule of a philosopher ruler, the state must be organized around 100% logical principles. Does the average person have the right to question those? As long as they are willing to do so based on nothing but logic and genuine arguments, not rhetoric or name calling. Unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of people is incapable of acting logically like that and therefore they will likely not play a role in directing state affairs. What cannot be questioned not spoken badly about however are the divinities of such a society, as they bring in the higher power aspect that every society needs in order to function.
Property would be managed similarly to how it was in feudalism. Average people can run a family business and can even buy land, but they still have to answer to their lord/lords.

Attached: constitution of the united states a white only nation by law.jpg (597x1024, 135K)

Only "white men of good character" totally means multiculturalism user. They were just messing with us by having slaves and not allowing non-whites to have citizenship. American indians didn't even gain citizenship until the 1920's but that's just because we couldn't get them to apply is all.

Attached: 1519473603814.png (396x385, 62K)

>What cannot be questioned not spoken badly about however are the divinities of such a society, as they bring in the higher power aspect that every society needs in order to function.
>Average people can run a family business and can even buy land, but they still have to answer to their lord/lords.
So what you're suggesting is replacing an oligarchy you can criticize with a nobility you can not with the sole check against corruption in the system being a single person. You might as well just take the jump and hop on the AI run technocracy bandwagon because you're almost there in terms of imagining an ideal dystopia.

>questioned not spoken badly
nor*

The founders weren't retarded

>the sole check against corruption in the system being a single person
Oh no. The main check against corruption is the hereditary aspect of all state positions. Also, it would be a combination of aristocracy and monarchy. This would also have to be a society that comes into being post-Western collapse, meaning technology and mainly access to technology would be heavily set back.

Is that why the country was white only up until the (((1960's)))? America was a pan European country promising liberty and freedom but now its turning into Brazil 2.0 but even shittier

Sounds a lot like the people who voted for Trump in major cities.

I can’t deny that I supported him as well back in those days, but now I understand that voting is fruitless and will never solve anything. I hope more people realize that and that they turn towards more despotic regimes.