Was Jesus a Liberal or a Conservative?

Who in politics would he chastise?
Would he be a hipster or a jihadi?
Would he support Planned Parenthood?
Would he support the right to bear arms?

Attached: Xp.png (629x946, 879K)

Liberal socialist

Jesus Christ is the only-begotten Son of God.
The labels liberal and conservative are SO far beneath Him that this thread must be hidden.
God bless, OP.

Good response but why hide the thread?

Well he'd almost certainly be socially conservative on most issues and I don't think he really held much of an opinion ether way on economics during his time on earth. Aside from saying things like "render unto Ceaser that which is Ceasers" and "the poor you will always have..." I can't think of much he had to say on the subject off the top of my head (admittedly I'm not the anywere near as well versed in the Bible as I should be) But I doubt Christ would have been a socialist. He seemed to be very pleased with generous giving and charity but whether he would approve of the state redistricting wealth is something I'm doubtful of. Jesus seemed very intrested in the motives of someone's heart in the actions they performed as he would call out people doing "good" things out of vanity to make people notice them and think they were good people and the motives of a system of bureaucratic distribution of welfare would probably not please him.
That said if someone were to sit down with Christ and get his true political and economic views on how things should be we'd probably get something so unique and different that we'd have to add a z axis to our political compass just to classify it. But we'll get to see just how Christ would actualy lead a nation when Kingdom comes. And hopefully that day comes soon.

Political Christianity is hardly represented in American political discourse.

If you want to see what a Christian politic looks like, you have to look particularly at the Medieval ages, and to a lesser extent the dark, exploration and Victorian ages.

The most Christian political options today are either the Republican party or disengaging with politics altogether.

Attached: 1531891976417.jpg (891x1000, 300K)

He was quite clear, give ceasar what's for ceasar and give God what's is for God.

Political labels and puny human inventions are beneath him. But, the closest we can define his political affiliation would be Conservative.

Socially, he was against everything degenerate - so gay marriage, trannies, adultary etc and everything in between is a sin. Not very Liberal is it now?

Secondly, he was very traditional so there's another thing that connects him to conservatism.

Thirdly, he was against forced good deeds - good deeds were to be voluntary and not forced and to do so in 'silence' from the heart - so Liberals forcing shit down our throat as well seeking attention will probably piss him off.

He told us to accept the needy - but also told his followers (as well as the God in the old testament) that we should respect a nations borders. So, i'm not sure what he is here?

So, he is pretty Conservative up until the last point, which i am dumbfounded by desu. How can you tell your followers to respect nations borders but also accept refugees?

He didnt exist you polytheistic heathen.

he was a kike

He was a reformer of Judaism so he's definitely no conservative

No, sweetie.

Attached: JesusWasNotASocialist.jpg (1617x388, 130K)

>The labels liberal and conservative are SO far beneath Him
Right on, except that I opposed paying people who would not work, and specifically told his followers to buy swords, and he is literally going to burn every faggot in hell, and the bible tells Christians to build walls something like 200 times, and he will be incinerating anyone who aborts their own child, but other than all that, there's really no telling which side of the fence he's on.

By respecting the laws of the government.

The US has one of the most generous LEGAL immigrations systems on the planet. The bible states very clearly that the Lord sees one as a sinner by breaking laws of government. It is also very clear that a nation's sovereignty is allowed to be protected.

>Doesn´t know what socialism (marxist) is
typical christiancuck

>Socialism totally is not about paying people to be indolent and socialists would never, ever, ever support a welfare state.
Right, got it. Sorry I interrupted. Please resume your appeal for UBI.

>liberal or conservative
No.
Jesus IS King.
>who would he chastise?
Everyone
>hipster or jihadi
Neither. He IS King.
>support planned parenthood
No.
>right to bear arms
Yes.

>My kingdom is not of this world
There are a few clues in that statement that suggest he transcends the liberal-conservative dichotomy among a few other things.

>He told us to accept the needy - but also told his followers (as well as the God in the old testament) that we should respect a nations borders. So, i'm not sure what he is here?
>So, he is pretty Conservative up until the last point,
Can you give me a quote from scripture?

Accepting the needy yes but not to the point that it destroys your nation. The term refugee has a negative connotation because of what has happened in Italy, France, Germany... Hundreds of thousands if not millions of new people, many of which coming from Africa, which has nothing to do with the humanitarian crisis in the me. "Accepting the needy" is a balanced statement because when you invite someone into your home you don't give them carte blanche to shit in the living room and invite some friends over, have a party, steal all your food and rape your daughter. 'Needy' implies weakness and vulnerability. The words 'refugee' and 'migrant' (through no fault of anyone who lives in a country that people migrate to) is now an umbrella term that includes anyone who wants to exploit the welfare states of Europe.

>needy
>refugee
Not the same thing. That's what politics and the msm do, they convuses people because of their claim to monopoly on language.
The methods of determining who is a genuine victim in need of help is in many countries incredibly lax.

Attached: needy.png (476x401, 23K)

He'd be liberal. He literally said rich people can't get into heaven. He spent his time helping the poor and needy. He would hate the republicans and the rich, especially trump.

I literally talk about this shit every sunday with my ex-pastor grandfather. Jesus would be liberal.

economically left wing and socially conservative

He would purchase an assault rifle and kill everyone in Washington DC

He was a massive hippy. Went against the establishment and taught his own new age shit. His eastern teachings even flooded into the West and the hipsters there fucked everything up just like what's happening now (Marxism and the Jews' critical theory being the eastern faiths).

Neither. He cares not for Earthly politics.

>He literally said rich people can't get into heaven.
No, he said it "wasn't easy." But then, he said it wasn't easy for anyone. At the time, it was automatically assumed by the Jewish leaders that the rich automatically got into Heaven, why else would God have blessed them so materially. Jesus said that they have the same chance as everyone else.

Attached: king.png (480x480, 240K)