You should legally be allowed to kill people you save.
For example if I cut free someone tied to train tracks narrowly avoiding an incoming train, immediately after there will be a trial to determine if I did save them and if I was the only one that could have. Thereafter if I murder them I will be free from legal consequences.
No wonder you westoids wont exist in 10 years you all are retards
Mason Thomas
A classified trial?
what are you even on?
Ryder Rivera
Not an argument. What are *you* on? When did I say classified trial?
Ian Garcia
You have to be 18 to post here kiddo. Go back to bed - it's a school night.
Adrian Reed
Show flag...This has to be a troll
Nicholas Wood
this is too retarded to even consider discussing, meme flag
Dominic Ward
Why would you kill someone you saved in the first place ? Are you stupid ?
John Young
been 20 minutes >1 post by this ID Slide thread
Grayson Martin
>*Man about to die* >”Help, please” >*Hispanic gangsters roll up in one of those muscle cars with hydraulics* >”Ay we got you compadre” >”Never mind I’ll take my chances, I don’t know what you fucks might do to me.”
Thats a good point, if you were the kind of person to save people why would you want to kill the person you saved? They would have to be a real dick or truly evil. Seems like you proved why this should be legal. Not an argument.
Daniel Phillips
Why go to all the trouble of saving someone if you just want to kill them afterwards?
Alexander Gutierrez
Nobody asked you to save anyone. You made the decision, don't expect reward.
Logan Diaz
>What are *you* on? When did I say classified trial?
whose life did you "save"?
Luis Bennett
This is a stupid thread but people change overtime and so the same person you saved a year ago may not be the same person you're killing today, even if they have been in the same body throughout.
But this is just stupid. Sage this thread, it belongs on /b/.
Also this. They don't owe you anything.
Joshua Stewart
See There are many laws that make sure some things you decide to do are rewarded, this has nothing to do with why it should or shouldn't be legal. The person tied to the train tracks. I literally don't care, this is a question about legality and politics and as such it will remain here. You can leave at any time.
Kevin Young
Your a funny guy sully and i like you, that is why I'm going to stage your death save you and kill you last...
Michael Hall
>The person tied to the train tracks.
And who was that?
is it classified?
Jordan Jackson
[redacted]
Cooper Allen
Anyone, it doesn't matter, it was an example. Can you start being serious please?
Jaxon Lopez
So what would be the point of saving someone if you just wanted to kill them in the first place?
Brody Reed
If a person is tied to a train track you don't have to save him. You can choose to walk by. If you save the person you have no right to kill him. Because he owes you life doesn't mean you can take it away. By that logic parents should be allowed to kill their children since they gave them life. Good actions are optional, bad actions are prohibited. You don't have to save the guy, but you can't murder him. Only because you saved him the definition of murder doesn't change. Life is not to be exchanged in a transaction, and it's not a zero sum game.
That’s fucking retarded. But we are on 4chin so what should I have expected?
Asher Cruz
What about lifeguards?
Brandon Adams
You should legally be allowed to kill people who save you, as a pre-emptive self defense measure.
Joshua James
How do you even know he's a westoid? Dude has a meme flag, you dont even know where he's from. The fuck is a westoid anyway? Is this what you foreign fucks do all the day when the greatest country is asleep? Act like retards?
Noah Rivera
What a retard
Jacob Lee
t. Westoid cuck
Camden Young
>Only reason you exist is because of me >I should be able to kill you >Parents are now legally allowed to kill their children