The "victims of illegal immigrants" argument for the wall is really weak...

The "victims of illegal immigrants" argument for the wall is really weak. It reminds me of dems showing children crying in cages. It's clear emotional manipulation. Yes, if you bring in immigrants, some of them will kill people. Same is true of having babies. Some babies will grow up to be murderers. Is that an argument for abortion?

Attached: Arriaga-Singh-640x480.jpg (640x480, 60K)

kill yourself shill rat

Tools that work should be used

Look spic, we don't want anymore of your people invading us.

FUCK OFF>

the paycheck delay is not a glitch, brock is out of money and you're not getting paid.

Victims of Democrats is statistically more compelling because they commit almost all of the crime and advocate for importation of more criminals.

>Yes, if you bring in immigrants, some of them will kill people.
Great argument. Too bad you lost it to yourself before you were even done schlomoing.

>comparing murder to staged press photos

It is a weak argument. The argument should simply be that illegal immigrants are bad for the economy because they artificially reduce the value of labour of all working people. On top of that, any form of social welfare is outright impossible to have if you have an unlimited number of people able to walk into the country and claim welfare.

Anyone who claims that "Mexicans do jobs Americans won't do" is an outright racist. They see Mexicans as a sub-class that is little more than a servant or slave. The wages they are being paid are simply not enough for a genuine American citizen to live off.

How is that different than population growth of the native population? More murders will occur as the population grows. Are republicans simply against population growth because it results in more murders?

Imagine concern trolling and being this much of a nigger faggot

Some fun facts:
The US actually encouraged immigration from from Mexico in the late 1800's and early 1900's and during WW2.

Illegals kill some people
>God damn animal beaners!
White guy goes on shooting rampage
>Well that's the cost of freedom!

>How is that different than population growth of the native population?

Native murder may differ from murder rate among foreigners thus bringing in 100k of immigrants may raise homicide rate higher than the same number of new natives.

It might raise the murder rate, but we don't know that. Dems say the murder rate of illegals is lower, but there really aren't any conclusive studies.

i agree, that's not even close to the best argument against them, the vast majority of their crime is committed against fellow gang bangers. the real problem is if you're an american citizen who doesn't want to join the rat race, who wants to live a simple life with simple amenities, you're competing with these conniving criminals who will happily share a studio apartment with 5 roommates in order to take your job.

>It might raise the murder rate, but we don't know that.
And we don't have to. Your population of Hispanics and blacks provides sufficient data to conclude that letting in more people like that is not a good idea.

I know, right? It's just like, "Why take thalidomide and lead-based paint off the market?" There's a chance that genetic issues will just naturally make babies be born retarded. Sure, if we just lead-based paint everything and give pregnant women thalidomide for morning sickness, some of their children will be born retarded. Same is true of having babies anyway, some will just naturally be retarded.

Like OP

The Mexican population has more murderes per capita than America. Canada has less murders per capita.

Then you have to resort to actual racist arguments which, while true, aren't permitted in social discourse. Republicans are bending over backwards to prove racism isn't motivating their stance on immigration.

why does he shave his head bald when he has a full head of hair?

Looking at the per capital murder rate of a nations population is not racist.

That's why they use emotional manipulation. And it's not weak, only somewhat dishonest, but I don't see the reason why you wouldn't employ this tactic if your opponent is shamelessly beating you over the head with this kind of tricks repeatedly.

The murder rate of mexico is 5 times higher than in the US
Therefore, allowing unfiltered mexicans into the US will raise the murder rate

This logic is racist according to Jow Forums

>mass shootings are only committed by whites
No penis lip, they’re only reported on when whites commit them. Shitskins blasting each other is so commonplace that it’s barely newsworthy, plus it doesn’t fit the very narrative you’re attempting to peddle here.
Pic related, get fucked shill faggot

Attached: 4540B66E-43A2-4247-8CFE-977AAFCA9DAE.jpg (600x833, 114K)

Rookie COP, 22, female, gunned down in Davis last night. They haven't released info on the shooter.

Attached: officer+shot5.jpg (621x349, 19K)

So we should reject a clearly effective strategy because the enemy also use it?

I'll explain quickly how you're wrong.

The images used by the left to legitimate the invasion of the US are manufactured outright, whether it's the literal staging of a scene like that picture of the child standing in a fake cage during a street demo, or an image of an actual detention. In the latter case, people are choosing to subject themselves to that treatment. Illegals know they are subject to detention. They subject themselves to that detention in the interest of furthering propaganda, pure and simple.

The use of emotional imagery by the right in its argument against the invasion of the US is not manufactured and is objectively true. Whereas a crime committed by a citizen is simply a risk embedded within that society by virtue of the fact that some of its citizens will become criminals, crimes committed by illegals are eminently preventable on grounds that the only thing necessary to prevent such a crime is the enforcement of immigration law. Every single crime committed by an illegal alien could have been preempted by adequate national security measures, pure and simple.

Any attempt to equate those two premises is so visibly fake, wrong and gay that it barely merits a response.

Attached: 1527972765545.jpg (1600x900, 187K)

only crime here is they only got one of the pigs

We all know it's a bad argument brainlet, it's just more palatable to your average GOP boomer than "these people are genetically unfit to be citizens of this country and will drag you into the mud just by existing"