Oregon gun control. 5 round mag limit. 20 round a month purchase limit

northwestfirearms.com/threads/sb-501-permit-to-own-20-rounds-per-month-limit-mags-5-banned.287821/
SECTION 6.
(1) As used in this section:
(a) “Detachable” means that an ammunition feeding device can be loaded or unloaded while detached from a firearm and readily inserted into a firearm.
(b) “Fixed” means that an ammunition feeding device is contained in or permanently attached to a firearm in such a manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action.
(c) “Large-capacity magazine” means an ammunition feeding device, whether fixed or detachable, with the capacity to accept more than five rounds of ammunition, but does not include any of the following:
(A) An ammunition feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it is not capable, now or in the future, of holding more than five rounds of ammunition;
(B) A 0.22 caliber tube ammunition feeding device; or
(C) A tubular ammunition feeding device that is contained in a lever-action firearm.
(2) Except as provided in this section, a person may not possess a large-capacity magazine at any time after 180 days after the effective date of this 2019 Act.
(3) Prior to the 180th day following the effective date of this 2019 Act, a person in possession of a large-capacity magazine shall take one of the following actions with respect to each magazine:
(a) Permanently alter the magazine so that it is not capable, now or in the future, of holding more than five rounds of ammunition;
(b) Transfer or sell the magazine to a gun dealer out of state;
(c) Otherwise remove the magazine from the state;
(d) Transfer the magazine to a law enforcement agency; or
(e) Permanently dispose of the magazine.

Attached: _20190111_082138.jpg (720x1024, 220K)

When will you people learn that whether its a cop, a nigger on wellfare, a judge, a beaurocrat, or any federal job, they are just parasites on a middle class. They vote for their interests to remain a parasite eternally or until the host collapses. When you go out into public, realize these people arent your friends, they are the enemy. These people would steal from you and your family to pay their paychecks with glee on their faces, because they are not americans, they are traitorous parasites that need to be violently and painfully removed.

Attached: ++ (3).jpg (657x543, 118K)

(c) “Large-capacity magazine” means an ammunition feeding device, whether fixed or detachable, with the capacity to accept more than five rounds of ammunition, but does not include any of the following:
(A) An ammunition feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it is not capable, now or in the future, of holding more than five rounds of ammunition;
(B) A 0.22 caliber tube ammunition feeding device; or
(C) A tubular ammunition feeding device that is contained in a lever-action firearm.

This is unacceptable, background checks for ammo sales with mandatory records!
>"... a state authority is entitled to demand respect and protection only when it meets the interests of a people, or at least does not harm them. There can be no such thing as state authority as an end in itself, for, if there were, every tyranny in this world would be unassailable and sacred. If, by the instrument of governmental power, a nationality is led toward its destruction, then rebellion is not only the right of every member of such a people - it is his duty. "
>"In general it should not be forgotten that the highest aim of human existence is not the preservation of a state, let alone a government, but the preservation of the species. And if the species itself is in danger of being oppressed or utterly eliminated, the question of legality is reduced to a subordinate role. Then, even if the methods of the ruling power are alleged to be legal a thousand times over, nonetheless the oppressed people's instinct of self-preservation remains the loftiest justification of their struggle with every weapon. "

Attached: 2qvx.png (806x940, 541K)

>fags do faggy stuff

Based. The military isn't on "our" side either. They'll follow orders like they always have.

How did it come to this? In the early 1800's, the right to bear arms was cherished by every US citizen. Americans were blessed to live in a nation and have a government that allowed them to protect themselves. Now it seems like half of us are begging to have rights stripped from us and elected officials that are sworn to uphold the 2nd amendment are actively seeking its destruction.
Where did it all go wrong bros?

Attached: 8a4.jpg (316x202, 30K)

war now?

The 20 round a month limit will be challenged. It puts an undue burden on fire arm owners. Being allowed to own a firearm with no ammunition is not the spirit of the second amendment.

>How did it come to this?
Jews

Media constantly talking about gun control and how evil firearms are, and the white men who kill.
But theyll never tell you its mostly niggers killing other niggers

Jewish media

>"our" side
shill

Short version: The progressive movement wasn't strangled in its crib in the late 1800s.

If you’re not a shit hunter and need to use more than 20 rounds a month, you don’t deserve a gun.

Women

jewish subversion plus the importation of non-white immigrants that came from countries with authoritarian governments where the right to keep and bear arms didn't exist

Nome of this shit is in the spirit of the second amendment

Too many shit families that are generations deep with very little vested interest in the country and are too retarded to see why the country is great, and the powers to be are doing their best to import people who hate us and never will. Also women, POC, and LGBTQ+ act out of spite, and if you combine any of those subsets they're generally exponentially more aggressive towards civil liberties they don't like.

Jow Forumslord here.

Wish this would happen in my lambo and I would love to take this thing to the supreme.

lol

>Being allowed to own a firearm with no ammunition is not the spirit of the second amendment.

You think they fucking care?
In Pittsburgh, the city council is trying to get semi-auto weapons banned from within city limits entirely, despite the fact that the Pennsylvania state constitution is even MORE explicit in it's protection of the right to bear arms than the US constitution, saying that “The right of citizens to bear arms, in defence of themselves and the State, shall not be questioned”.
QUESTIONED.
The very IDEA of infringement violates the state constitution, and that doesn't stop these shameless kikes from doing so.

>You think they fucking care?
This. They don't care what constitutional rights they're stepping on. They're already circumventing the 1st amendment with Operation Choke Point.

>5 round mag limit
So what do Oregonfags do if six guys attack them?

Or of one guy attacks him six times?

>InB4 1 in the pipe

Attached: 1547150651890.jpg (720x960, 62K)