Why do liberals want to ban assault rifles

Eli Flores
Eli Flores

When school shooters who use pistols typically have a higher kill count than those using long firearms?

Attached: 5364543F-DBE5-44D4-8B91-C927F444B709.jpg (465 KB, 705x580)

Nicholas Campbell
Nicholas Campbell

Because white men use rifles and niggers use handguns.

Carter Brooks
Carter Brooks

they dont care. they want guns gone and "assault rifles" are the easiest target. you can show them all the statistics you can find that proves that rifles are insignificant to overall firearm deaths and it wont matter because "a civilian shouldnt have something like that".

Dylan Kelly
Dylan Kelly

"Assault rifles" to the left is like punishing criminals to the right. It's a low-hanging fruit that every latches into

Julian Hall
Julian Hall

Because people who plan to attack you, with assault rifles, want to take away your assault rifles. It reduces their own risks of being killed. The people most eager to disarm you are those who plan to attack you.

Blake Edwards
Blake Edwards

This.
They just wanna disarm you.

Nathaniel Young
Nathaniel Young

We use English on this board
Learn it

Cameron Martin
Cameron Martin

because they are juden, and want to enslave all non-juden. while having fun pitting whites against eachother, cause the blood makes them giggle
tee-hee.. tee-hee.

prove me wrong. you can't.

Gabriel Fisher
Gabriel Fisher

When school shooters who use pistols typically have a higher kill count than those using long firearms?

bullshit

Charles Perez
Charles Perez

I guarentee you liberals think this because they are brainwashed and most have never even held a gun. Or a sword. Or a hammer. Or a drill. They are confident enough that their fragile worlds will continue without SHTF.

Matthew Edwards
Matthew Edwards

They want to ban all guns and the best way is to start with the scary black ones.

Benjamin Cox
Benjamin Cox

Assault rifle sounds more threatening than semi-automatic pistol
They don't care about the guns or the kids, they just want to virtue signal/make money.

Owen Butler
Owen Butler

Is that piece of garbage yours?

Attached: 1547478970731.png (20 KB, 225x225)

Jordan Carter
Jordan Carter

If you have a gun you can defend against pack of niggers if not good luck......These piece of shit people want to see you and your family hacked to fucking pieces by bunch of niggers,

Jacob Perez
Jacob Perez

Kek

Liam Fisher
Liam Fisher

rifles are insignificant to overall firearm deaths
More people are beaten to death with bludgeoning objects than are killed with rifles every single year. This is ALL rifles including semi-automatic sporting rifles AND automatic "assault" rifles.

Samuel Cox
Samuel Cox

Anyone can purchase flammable liquids, walk into a classroom, splash a container of the flammable liquid on the students, and use a cigarette lighter to light them on fire. A classroom of 50+ students can all be burned to death and the build could end up burning down completely. No need for a firearm, flammable liquids are available everywhere in the form of gasoline, grill lighter fluid, household chemicals, and so on. If someone wants to do harm then harm can and will be done.

When are you goddamn morons going to realize the anti-gun crowd only wants to end the 2nd Amendment? How many more goddamn decades will it take for you to catch up?

Attached: 5697106194084.jpg (134 KB, 900x598)

Hudson Turner
Hudson Turner

Its all about baby steps.

Dylan Nelson
Dylan Nelson

I cannot
You’re right

Jason Jones
Jason Jones

what kind of glock is that?
is that the glock .40?
is that your problem solver?

Leo Bell
Leo Bell

because you could use your rifle, when they come for your handguns
hence this is the right order of gun grab - rifles first, then handguns

Attached: murder-by-gun-2016.jpg (53 KB, 552x451)

Cooper Bennett
Cooper Bennett

That glock is a Tec9

Aiden Turner
Aiden Turner

I’ve tried to figure this out for a while.

Partly ignorance. I worked on a campaign and spoke to a lot of voters in the immediate wake of the Florida shooting. Many claimed that we need to ban “machine guns,” which have been illegal since the 1970s.

People who have never handled a gun in their lives and live in a culture (e.g., cosmopolitan suburbs) where gun ownership is an aberration don’t understand that the presence of a pistol grip and a retractable stock (see: cosmetic features) don’t make the gun more dangerous, nor do they really care to. They’ve already decided gun owners are rednecks and don’t particularly care about their traditions, way of life, or right to defend themselves.

Partially, this is because people’s ignorance is exploited by well-meaning pundits. There was an article I saw a little while ago that claimed, under the guise of dispassionate analysis, that banning “military-style” “assault” weapons is a critical component of stopping gun violence. The reason being that they’re the common thread between most mass shootings. The real reason is that the AR-15 happens to be the most popular gun in America, but that’s besides the point.

The bottom line is that the left has once again weaponized shame in this case and made this a nonsensical moral issue. They don’t particularly care about debating gun policy anymore, they think semi-automatic rifles with a pistol grip and a retractable stock are things Trumptards are clinging to in a world that would be better off without them, and they are content to blame the 3 million members of the NRA for crimes that they have nothing to do with. And it’s deeply uncomfortable for any public figure or politician to point out that 32 people were killed at Virginia Tech with handguns in this atmosphere.

I just think people don’t spend too much time thinking about it. Muh “weapons of war.”

Ian Richardson
Ian Richardson

ive always wanted to shoot one FA, but theres no place around me to do that

Isaiah Brown
Isaiah Brown

Not only arson, but also bombs
Ban fertilizer

Eli Jones
Eli Jones

Because in order to pacify a population you have to remove their capability to resist. An effective resistance movement against an overwhelming force always requires guerilla tactics. You can’t plan assaults and raids without long range firefight capability against a modern military

Ryan Bell
Ryan Bell

Who cares start lobbying to get AT rockets.

Christopher Perez
Christopher Perez

As if liberals form their own opinions. The elites want guns gone because they are afraid of people getting angry enough at them to shoot them. They push the media, that they fully control, to whip up the general population (on the left anyway) to disarm themselves in the name of public safety. They want to ban all guns, but they'll publicly focus on the ones they think the public might agree to ban.

Logan Jackson
Logan Jackson

they should be banned

Aiden Hernandez
Aiden Hernandez

all legal guns confiscated
illegal firearm crime rises

Matthew James
Matthew James

My argument is unable to be proved wrong, so I'm right

Austin Sanchez
Austin Sanchez

And the fact that handguns are all but useless against these people. They’re afraid of a revolution, which loses a lot of prospect when the population you’ve got a stronghold on is vastly outgunned

Joseph Martin
Joseph Martin

Because the slight threat of us actually using our rifles against them is the only reason we're still allowed to remain alive.

Ethan Hall
Ethan Hall

probably because they're all false flags

Attached: loughner.jpg (38 KB, 635x546)

Noah Phillips
Noah Phillips

depending on what you mean by liberal you may be lumping in people that shouldnt be.
generally the goal is to do a similar thing Game Devs do when they Nerf players. You try to reduce the players effectiveness. Increasing the time to kill, reducing a person's ability to kill multiple players. making weapons fine for personal defense against 1 or 2 people, but ineffective for mass slaughter. removing "long firearms" reduces a person's ability to kill at range with higher caliber ammunition. forcing a close up confrontation may dissuade someone from trying, making them more easily identified and retaliated against while using less lethal rounds.
the other way to accomplish this would be to increase the difficulty of obtaining long range, high fire rate, high caliber weapons. instead of making the weapons as a whole weaker, you put them behind an achievement barrier.

Eli Rogers
Eli Rogers

because guns are more powerful than people
and it bothers them if something is more powerful than themselves

Benjamin White
Benjamin White

what is Virginia Tech

Owen Morgan
Owen Morgan

This, also those that want to ban guns know the police who show up to take them will have these same rifles, you can fight against the military and police much better with a long gun than you can with a pistol.

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit