Who would win?

The year is 1558.

Attached: brown.jpg (536x395, 85K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Alcácer_Quibir
youtube.com/watch?v=mXqszbQVdaw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

That's like letting a tank fight against some grunt with a carabiner

But wakanda my niggah!!!!

Attached: 1489968649369.jpg (960x541, 49K)

They still had gunpowder in 1558

Depends on the environment my Turkish friend, in the Savanna probably the bantu. And in Europe the knight.

Attached: Ass gaping autist.png (600x971, 189K)

You're forgeting the Knight has a higher iq and much better training and education. He wins anywhere

In 1v1 knight would win 100% if he isn't a retard,that spear can't pierce armor , one hit with a sword and black man is dead

I think Palestine is hotter than the Savanna and the crusaders did p well there.

>savannah
You mean the shooting gallery?

Attached: Boomsticks.jpg (960x720, 94K)

>shoots the nigger

Attached: 35988489914_b9363c7d12_b.jpg (1024x507, 116K)

different time, different armour.

but it doesn't matter, because

Depends on the battlefield. On a flat plain of Europe the knight would win if he can catch the Zulu (highly unlikely, the Zulu had amazing stamina).

If they're in Natal, where high mountains dominate the landscape and the sun is murderous, the knight will get exhausted and killed pretty quickly.

There's a reason shitskins sold their kin to kike slavers for cannons and muskets.

With what? Knights weren't big on guns

Will the winged hussars arrive?

worked in vietnam, but with shit instead of guns

European army would win even if outnumbered 10 to 1.
Unorganized light infantry against heavy cavalry and pikes supported by crossbows/early gunpowder weapons.
They would rout at the early stages of the battle.
They'd have a chance at asymmetric warfare tho

If the Zulu is running away, wouldn't that be a win for the knight?

basically what the Spanish did in the americas,

Testing

But the Zulu were a highly-organized and militaristic. Just because most niggers have no discipline or military organization, doesn't mean none of them do

Once the knight is tired the Zulu could easily come back and kill him.

Also the right answer is right.
Suit of armor can't fight on its own.

assuming hes a knight, he would be mounted. 1500s so im guessing the horse would be armoured as well. knights were also known to have incredible stamina. they trained and exercised in armor all the time. i think you're confusing modern pussy Europeans with what yall used to be like. fuck u

Full platemail niggers would beat spearchucking niggers hands down every time. Jiggaboos would be taking 20 casualties for every one that managed to stick a spear in the armor's weak points.

The only advantages a literally subpar army may have is familiar terrain and the element of surprise. Given the fact that a superior force is always 10 steps ahead on intel, all it takes is one dumb mistake for luck to roll in the enemy's favor. And terrain can be overcome by a disciplined force lead by level-headed command.

Dumb faggot no matter how much the knight in full plate sweats he wins 99% of the time. Sweat doesnt melt armor

The zulu can't pierce the knight's armor with his spear, so it'd essentially be what happened to the Incas during the Spanish Invasion of South America.
Knight wins

The knight just need to show them a shiny piece of glass the niggers would think knight are God's knight enslave the nigger just like real life

>he thinks the africans won't use guerilla tactics and buy guns from abroad

And this is how Italy lost to Ethiopia

Listen here Amerimutt, we are talking dismounted 1v1. Doesn't matter how well trained you are, running in the mountains under scorching heat will suck dick. Add in heavy armor and you, my friend, are fucked.

is this a protracted engagement or a one on one deal.

>running in the mountains under scorching heat
Why would the armored need to run?
Just slowly advance until they've nowhere left to run to. They didn't have crossbows nor arrows capable of piercing that shit so noo need to rush at all.

>1v1 dismounted
>running in the mountains

Which one is it faggot? A maraton or a fight?

Yeah, but heatstroke kills

*calls in heavy cannon*

The knight would never be able to catch the zulu

Then don't run. The assumption is they fight, not that the zulu runs for hours while the knight chases him with benny hill music playing.

whos running? why are u assuming thres going to be running involved ? also why is this knight in africa without a horse? arent knights mounted warriors by definition?

>Heatstroke kills
Yea so?

A warrior is not a soldier, I doubt they could form a phalanx with those light hide shields and short spears, but even if they could crossbow bolts would go through the shield, pikes would poke them to death from a safe distance and heavy cavalry would trample anyone dumb enough to hold the line, and the 10 niggers behind him.
And now, add to the mix that they never fought anything resembling european soldiers, formations, weapons, armor and tactics.

Block this fucking casul

>add to the mix that they never fought anything resembling european soldiers, formations, weapons, armor and tactics
This is the real killer right here.

How the hell is a dude in 30 pounds of metal armor going to corner a nigger who spent his youth running bare-foot across thorns?

The African one

How the hell are you going to get your horse into mountains?

This

Attached: 0fd7c26638b5d2a27fb9db3e559b8d7c.jpg (736x515, 102K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Alcácer_Quibir

Why would you need to?
Is the nigger going to run indefinitely?
You could advance on every settlement they had & burn it all, exterminating their women & children while they ran around like morons.

>Doesn't know knights ride horses

When two races fight, the Jew wins.

Attached: 1549767790217.jpg (1920x1080, 393K)

So if they were fighting in Africa unless it's night time this dude would be passing out from the heat in this armor. Not to mention how slow he would be. This type of armor would win en masse in a war but not 1 v 1. There are still holes in that armor and being dodged and evaded while you roast in the sun would suck. I'd actually imagine that in this 1 v 1 the European would take off this armor and use chainmail or even leather vs a nigger with a spear

KARA BOĞA for sure

wh*Toids BTFO

A British Expeditionary Force
youtube.com/watch?v=mXqszbQVdaw

Nigga will just run around and chuck spears, till he hit something.

Which book is it quoted from?

The BLACK BULL would destroy the wh*Te subhuman. He doesn't need to hide behind armor because he's an alpha male unlike the wh*Te coward.

Attached: the virgin wave vs the chad burn.jpg (1199x745, 268K)

>what is a crossbow?

Same reason the Japs shit themselves at the thought of a Conquistador army invading and allowed priests instead. Few reports of ronin fighting Spanish troops in brawls and streetlights always ended up in mass slaughter of the japs/pinoys and any other non euro involved.
Tokugawa specifically referenced an event where 17 former Samurai who had all fought in multiple wars before their lord was killed and a couple were considered esteemed fighters were all killed to a man by only 2 Spanish sailors without wearing armour and half drunk.

Any time Europeans in that period went to actual war with any non whites they slaughtered them with relative ease. Europeans had the heritage of Rome, Ceasar and Charlemagne and centuries of refined warfare fighting in all sorts of terrain against an assorted set of tactics and stratagems unseen or heard of outside of Europe.

Remember even the great Hannibal was routed coming after coming down the alps.

KARA BOĞA for sure

wh*Toids BTFO 10 out of 10 times

KEK the retarded nigger hasn't invented armor yet and never will

"The battle started as both sides exchanged several volleys of gunfire from musketry and artillery. Stukley, commanding the Portuguese center, was killed by a cannonball early in the battle. The Moroccan cavalry advanced and began to encircle the Portuguese army. Both armies soon became fully engaged in a melee."
What are you trying to argue here? You are posting a battle were both sides use cavalry and gunpowder weapons, I don't see the similarity with a 1500s european army vs zulus battle

Now you're talking about armies, not 1v1s. But even then, advancing across the Natal with horses and in armor is nearly impossible. Why do you think the Zulu didn't have cavalry? Because there are no horses there. They can't survive in the Natal. The Medieval European army would starve and die. Not to mention that Zulus had no problem ambushing their enemies.

Nevermind, it is Edward Taylor "visions of culture". I've been thinking about something similar and I found the quote interesting.

When will this meme end. Armour was not heavy you fucking idiot. If it was they would not have worn it. You can fucking do cartwheels and sprint in that gear. Its a fucking Hollywood meme that armour was heavy and slow.

Idk, just to fuck with you Sp*niggers

Horses cant climb trees

It's not that heavy, but you try wearing metal armor when it's 40 degrees outside

He wouldnt pass out from one fight with some naked nigger. He wouldnt be slow you play too many fucking video games. The type of armor would 99% win in 1v1 if the opponent was wearing none. Good luck trying to stab a full plated knight who is attacking you in his fucking armpit or whatever where theres STILL chainmail and a gambeson protecting him. Good luck dodging and evading and rolling like a based ebin dark souls hero. leather armor is a fucking meme

When you're talking about a 1v1, you're assuming the pair are going to face each other and fight. Are you saying the zulu would drop his nuts and run away from the knight? The knight would win a proper 1v1 in any environment 100% of the time.

If the zulu runs away, the knight wins: he doesn't have to follow him. The best strategy would be staying still, let the nigger try some shit (would't do much, plate armor is practically invulnerable to bladed weapons or rocks) and then strike when he is close.
Or trample the zulu with your war horse.
Or shoot him from afar since in 1558 europeans had guns and, more commonly, crossbows.
Or ignore the nigger and start a modern crusade to conquer the zulu's hometown and enslaving their women, that would be an option too

Running around is a legitimate strategy

A heavy rock could kill an armoured knight

get that nigger cock out of ur mouth and use ur brain. ther werent any horses in the americas untill the Spaniards showed up and made my ancestors. horses do fine in dry area. what is the american south west?

>How the hell is a dude in 30 pounds of metal armor going to corner a nigger who spent his youth running bare-foot across thorns?
Easy, ridding a horse.
Also, realize that fleeing is losing the battle. No army never prided itself in being better at fleeing than their enemies.

But if it's a 1v1 to the death they're going to have to meet in combat sooner or later. The knight would immediately recognise that the zulu is trying to exhaust him, and he would just stop and take a defensive position until the zulu had to attack.

Only if your opponent is expending energy also.
If they're standing still, invulnerable to your attacks while you also exhaust yourself you're fucked.

You don't have to wear plate, a light gambeson and mail would be enough to make the wearer impervious to the shitty weapons of the Africans. Not to mention a European sword or any weapons with European steel would go clean straight through their shields, and guard, killing or severely wounding the holder.

A European knight with a buckler and no armour other than light padding and a long sword would decimate hundreds of these fucks before being overwhelmed by exhaustion. Knights were not human battering rams on the field due to their armour alone - they were very well trained and most had decades of experience as well as competitive levels of fitness by virtue of having to or being killed in battle.

...are you serious?

Or he would start shooting at him, he does not only have a technological advantage in close quarters but also in ranged warfare.

That is, if the horse doesn't die getting there considering there are no horses in the Natal

Nigger they didn't have even catapults.
A rock large enough to kill an armored knight could not be thrown from out of striking distance.

And then what? The knight will die of heatstroke whilst the nigger laughs at him.

>he dies from an infected scratch
Yeah, strong nigger indeed

Meme flag is also historically, militarily, an all round ignorant moron baiting people for (you's).

Unless he drops it from tree on unsuspecting knight, I dont see how he manage to score hit.

Well, Spaniards couldn't get their horses into the Andes. Natal is even worse for horses

Not by your basedboy ass

>ad hominem
Typical nigger

Nobody asked you a thing pastaboy.

Please show me the chad that can toss a rock heavy enough to kill an armored knight from more than 2 meters away with any accuracy. Memeflaggot.

i cant believe im having this argument at 7am. also here looks like they're doing fine to me

Attached: Screenshot_2019-02-10-07-04-46.png (720x1280, 610K)

Man, you have no idea how much shit and animals we managed to get through mountains over 6000 years of history. Horses can traverse mountains easily if taught correctly

are you mad

Knight slowly goes under tree and wait in shadow, while nigga is running around.

Also has to throw it fast enough to not have him just step the fuck aside.

Yeah, because ranches exist

He's just a nigger

You're assuming they would be fighting in the centre of a desert with no cover (trees or large hills). The knight could simply walk over to some shade and wait for the zulu to come to him.

For the sake of the memeflag's argument, we're assuming melee combat only

We shipped horses to the americas.
Horses have been used and are being bred in south africa.
They could be moved longer distances at that time, and they can survive and breed in that climate.