Why doesn't the Bible mention anything about child sex abuse or pedophilia...

Why doesn't the Bible mention anything about child sex abuse or pedophilia? These things are basically considered to be maximum evil in modern Western society, but there isn't one single verse in the Bible that expresses the idea that sex can be wrong or harmful solely by virtue of the age of one of the parties involved, nor any that refer to the existence of persons who prefer prepubescent sex partners. These concepts simply don't exist in the Bible, which is odd, because the Bible discusses sexual morality quite extensively. The only sex condemned in the Bible is sex outside of marriage, homosexuality, and bestiality (masturbation is never mentioned either).

Seems like an extremely significant omission, given the way child sex abuse is discussed today.

Attached: Fellatio_Lesson_Priests.gif (400x225, 449K)

>christcucks are evil
what else is new

Because Christianity is based on JUDAISM

Judaism, litterally tell jews to go mutilate their son's DICKS

Well, yes, but I was hoping for some kind of apologist rationalization to tear apart. I understand that there are many Christians on this board, as well as people sympathetic to Christian values. Surely some of them must have something to say about this subject.

Lolis are best, all peoples knew this. The feminist "all sex is rape" rhetoric is nonsense.

Your jewgod told Abraham to go kill his son

Then, when Abraham had a knife in one hand and the head of his son in his other hand, your jewgod told him:
>"no, jk, just cut his fucking dick"

That's in your fucking bible, you piece of shit.

>understand that there are many Christians on this board, as well as people sympathetic to Christian values.
Those are called newfags and they are the worst scum.

the bible was put together during Babylonian times. I don't you think modern man can comprehend the mindset of religious people back then

"My" Bible?

So then, what you're saying is that modern views on sex in regards to age are unfounded, and this is perhaps why they are not reflected in the Bible?

I've lurked quite a while, and I frequently see threads posted by people who seem heavily immersed in this board defending Christianity. Maybe I'm mistaken, but I doesn't seem to me like only new people are of this persuasion. Quite the opposite.

Its literally one of the ten commandments do not fornicate

Because it doesn't cover everything it's not a book that has a rule or tip on how to live for every aspect of your life. It shouldn't be a question that pedophilia is wrong and especially not because some holy scripture doesn't mention it explicitly

Not a big deal as long as you kill old useless dried up cunts and remember, the goyim (nonwhites) exist for the hebrews (white european phenotype) pleasure since they are all nothing but whores and lol child temple prostitutes and lol peasant I just fucked your virgin bride

The definition of "fornication", either now or in the Greek, has no reference or connotation regarding age.

anyone who has sex with someone under the age of 25 must hang, anyone who is under 25 having sex must be arrested for social disorder, put into a re-education camp, and then put on a list that tracks mentally ill people for the rest of their lives

anyone who has art of paintings, whose colour configuration depicts someone under the age of 25 in a sexual or nude position must hang

anyone who has pieces of plastic or rubber or latex, whose colour configuration depicts someone under the age of 25 in a sexual or nude position must hang

anyone who has masturbation paraphernalia or toys, must hang, they are unnatural, and degenerate

That's like not mentioning that murder is wrong. It's not uncommon to hear people say that child molesters are as bad or worse than murderers. It's not a small detail to dispense with to save space.

It's a book, not a guide of moral principles on literally all aspects on life. It doesn't contain as many laws to cover every crime so saying because it isn't in there they condone it is ridiculous

So women shouldn't be allowed to breed until 13 years after they are fertile and 60% of their eggs are gone? Far out. Why do you believe this?

can you marry a kid or marry same sex? no? what's there more to discuss?

But it contains explicit references to some crimes/immoral acts, like murder, theft, adultery, and more. Is child abuse less serious than fucking a donkey? Why does it mention fucking donkeys but not children?

>Judaism, litterally tell jews to go mutilate their son's DICKS

But Christianity doesn't. It literally says don't do it.

It'd come under "adultery". Marriage is for procreation only, so teens and up, like what it was in much of Medieval times.

OT yids had to marry the children that they raped.
NT Jesus says something about a millstone around the neck

>adultery

That's child sex. And punishable by death.

Sex is only for procreation, so of age.

They could and did. Child marriage was common all throughout the ancient Middle East. Presumably, there was nothing legally stopping a man from having sex with an eight year old that he had married. It still goes on today in some regions.

So if it mentions some crimes it should mention all crimes actually or otherwise the other statements have less value?

>It'd come under "adultery". Marriage is for procreation only, so teens and up, like what it was in much of Medieval times.

>Sex is only for procreation, so of age.

There is no scripture that says that either. Iv'e heard Christians say that many times before, but there is no Biblical precedent for that belief at all.

"Adultery" is sex outside of marriage by a married person. There is no connotation of age. You cannot claim that child sex abuse falls under this because it simply doesn't at all.

If it mentions any crimes, it begs the question as to why certain crimes are mentioned but not others.

The Biblical age is basically “fully post-pubescent” and there isn’t a specific number of years. Jews historically used 12.5 years as the number value though, which is what a bar mitsvah or bat mitsvah is, the official “you are an adult now” ceremony.

And? That doesn't seem to address my question.

That doesn't seem right. If I say I hate milk does that then raise the question on why I didn't specify any other things I Hate?

>There is no connotation of age. You cannot claim that child sex abuse falls under this because it simply doesn't at all.

Since there's no age, then it'd be any sex outside of marriage, and that isn't for procreation.

So yes, kids and animals would fall under this, as would masturbation.

>can you marry a kid
Yes, it's only modern subverted feminist governments that say you can't.
>Jesus says something about a millstone around the neck
>another chrjstcuck who xant fucking read.
That reference is from when he said his followers should be like ignorant children and anyone who leads them astray should go die. Learn to read, dumbass. That story is your god insulting you.

Yes it does. There must be some reason why you mentioned milk, but not anything else. Do you hate milk more than anything else? Is milk the only thing you hate? Was milk on your mind because of some recent incident?

This is doubly true if you're purporting to tell me how to live my life with some kind of divine authority such as that which Moses claimed. You owe me an explanation because I need to be able to know what to do and what not to do. You can't just assume that I'm going to extrapolate "don't fuck kids" from "don't fuck other dudes". God didn't study law, I guess.

But there is no scripture that states that sex is only for procreation.

And there is also no scripture that condemns child sex abuse.

A teen, yes. But a teen was never considered a kid and was an adult back then. Hell, it was considered an adult 100-300 years ago too.

Ages were usually similar, with the male being a bit older.

Arabs did it differently, but they aren't Christians.

You gucking autist you shouldnt be fucking anything or anyone except your wife and purely vaginal woth hops of conception

>But there is no scripture that states that sex is only for procreation.

Yes. It states sex out of wedlock is a sin and that it's for procreation. I'll find you the passages if you're too lazy.

Child abuse, is literally sex with someone that can't produce children.

And the punishment is the same as any adultery.

Medieval times did punishments against child abusers you wouldn't believe, as well as rapists.

>There must be a reason
Maybe because I just don't like milk bit that doesn't mean I like or don't like other things

It does in fact revelations clearly predicts the downfall of the Catholic church will be pedophilia or abuse of children. It would be better to have a millstone hung from one's neck than to cause a young one to stumble on their pursuit of Christ (not an exact quote) and the millstone that falls from the sky in revelations to destroy the beast.

because it was written by sand niggers.

>I'll find you the passages if you're too lazy.
Please do. I'll wait. Except I already know they don't exist because I was raised in a fundie cult and know the Bible like I know the Calendar. If there were a verse that said that sex is only for procreation I would know about it.

It did. Back then the word for homosexual was the same as the word for pedophile in Aramaic.

The only reason to read the bible is to understand literature. It's stupid to take any lessons from it.

The bible doesnt mention video games... What now cucks?!

Attached: pecan-resist-detail.png (374x479, 69K)

Quote me the scripture that references child sex abuse or pedophilia.

oh it does
>Matthew 18:6 "But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea."
>Luke 17:2 "It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were cast into the sea than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin."
>Mark 9:42 "Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him if a great millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea."
if you pervert the youth, you are destroying the future generations, for they are a part of your arsenal
>Psalm 127:3-5 "Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward. Like arrows in the hand of a warrior are the children of one's youth. Blessed is the man who fills his quiver with them! He shall not be put to shame when he speaks with his enemies in the gate."

You're right, it doesn't. If God doesn't want us to play videogames, and he can predict the future, then he should have mentioned it in the Bible. Can't he do anything?

>bible bans all sex outside marriage
>but why doesn't it ban a specific form of fornication?

Source? That seems pretty weak. I know there is a verse that mentions "catamites", but I believe those were exclusively male, so homosexuality alone may have been the issue.

Ok, so just marry the kid first, then it's not a sin when you fuck children. Right?

Google it.

Marriage is between two people that are grown up. Sex outside of marriage is breaking a commandment.
This is just a failed reading comprehension thread. Go back to wherever you came from you stupid fucking retards.

Why doesn't it even vaguely mention something that is considered the epitome of evil to most people in the world today?

You have to understand that the term homosexual is a victorian concept, even in western culture. The words in ancient text don't line up with modern day culture or thinking.

>Marriage is between two people that are grown up.
Source.

I'm sure. The Bible doesn't even mention homosexuality, only the act itself of having sex with someone of the same gender. It doesn't reference any kind of alternate "orientations" or anything. It does mention male prostitutes, but that's still not the same thing.

Learn to read you retarded piece of shit.
>At that time the disciples came to Jesus and asked, “Who, then, is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?”
>He called a little child to him, and placed the child among them. 3 And he said: “Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. 4 Therefore, whoever takes the lowly position of this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. 5 And whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me.
>“If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea. 7 Woe to the world because of the things that cause people to stumble! Such things must come, but woe to the person through whom they come! 8 If your hand or your foot causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to enter life maimed or crippled than to have two hands or two feet and be thrown into eternal fire. 9 And if your eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to enter life with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into the fire of hell.
He is saying you should be like an ignorant child anyone who misleads you off of following him should go die. You fucking retard.
Because child brides is good.
Pedophilia was only demonized with the rise of feminism. You already know that and are make fun of the antis but still it has to said. These was never any anti-pedo sentim,any concept that sex with girlchildren is bad before the last century or so.
His ass

OP BTFO.

I have a very slight suspicion that it's kind of like a tacit law, nobody thought it was worthy of mentioning because everyone would stone the fuckers to death regardless of belief

And if they didn't? People could just fuck children and get away with it?

There are passages in the Bible that indicate the "time of love" is after the breasts have grown - i.e., after puberty. Sex with pre-pubescent children is naturally disgusting, harmful, and wrong. Sex outside of marriage is what is evil, not teenage brides, but before any marriage the fathers had to give consent - so they protect their daughters by not giving them in marriage until after their breasts have grown showing that they are ready for it.

>(masturbation is never mentioned either).
Wrong, Onan was killed for spilling his seed.

The Bible is retarded shit for dumb people

Attached: State of UK.jpg (197x256, 18K)

>The Bible doesn't even mention homosexuality,
Wrong. Being "effeminate" is worthy of death.

It doesn't say he masturbated.

Here's a rule of thumb that encompasses a lot of what christianity says; do unto others as you would want others to do unto you.

Did you wanna get raped as a child OP?

You should be posting loli pictures, bro.
>clearly all peoples observed modern feminist morality
>I just FEEL it must be true
Neat.
Incorrect, wrong, learn to read a goddamn story, holy shit. Onan was smited for dodging familial responsibility. It was his responsibility to put a son in his wife, who used to belong to his dead brother, to be an heir for his dead brother. But he wanted any sons he produced to be considered his and so finished on her back.

Attached: IMG_0373.jpg (616x394, 26K)

>There are passages in the Bible that indicate the "time of love" is after the breasts have grown - i.e., after puberty

I'm not aware of any that set an age requirement for sex or condemn sex with people outside of that age range.
>Sex with pre-pubescent children is naturally disgusting, harmful, and wrong.

Many would disagree, it seems.

Didn't what? Child diddlers would get tortured and hanged regardless of whether you were a manichean or whatever, seems more like it'd be a point of contention for kikes or goatfuckers

Or from the superior KJV which I should have just posted instead;
Luke 6:31
And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise

Yes. I wanted adult women to make the first move and take advantage of me. I fantasized about it all the time even at 9 years of age.

I've never heard any accounts of ancient semetic people hanging pedophiles.

If I was a loli, yeah, I'd want to get fucked by men.
Where are you getting this bullshit? It has zero basis in reality. Sex with girlchildren was never considered wrong until recently.

Attached: IMG_0372.jpg (640x360, 20K)

Are you an adult woman?

It would fucking your shit up

Isn't this the little girl that was married off to some 80 year old and she protested and international outrage forced the countries courts to annul the marriage?

I figured she'd have been assassinated by now. Muslims hate that sort of happy ending.

>t. wishful thinking pedophile

Yes because semites are pedis, re-read my post you dumbfuck mutt

Fuck shit up* fuck phoneposting

Her uncle "saved" her from being married off. The bastard.

Attached: 2017-04-14-little-terrorist.png (1000x1510, 752K)

>The only sex condemned in the Bible is sex outside of marriage
Wouldn't it include most of cases?

Google it you brainlet

No.

It is mentioned, in the form of not marrying people who are not mature. The Bible also mentions masturbation several times in the Old Testament. Look at the story of Onan and also the laws about being unclean if you "spill your seed", which is talking about masturbation.

I would probably have loved it and look back fondly upon the memories.

The pagans, specially european pagans, often sacrificed humans. Maybe the only exception in the ancient world were egyptians, based egyptians.

>Look at the story of Onan
Maybe you should look at it because that's not about masturbation.

Most "child sex abuse" is a guy having his daughter suck him off and/or eating her out which is totally okay because he owns her sk it is his right to us her for sex.

Guess you don't get to say christianity is ok with you fucking young girls or boys then.

But they wouldn't get married

>It is mentioned, in the form of not marrying people who are not mature.

Where does it say that? What is "mature"?

>Look at the story of Onan and also the laws about being unclean if you "spill your seed", which is talking about masturbation.

How do you know? Don't you spill your seed when you have sex too? Or a wet dream?

It's about not putting your seed in a woman, so it is tangentially related. But the Bible still mentions it directly in other places. Same with pedophilia and also rape and homosexuality, etc.

>Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.

New Testament says NOT to cut ya ding dongs.

do you have to have everything written down or you will do whatever? If no one told you would you eat shit?
Also there's a passage in the Bible about "what you do to kids you do to me" or something like that
go fuck yourself

Bible was edited by Romans. Figure it out.

It talks about not marrying someone who has not had the flower of her age and has "not grown up", so it's clearly wrong to marry children. Then of course we know that fornication is wrong, which means that any sex with children is wrong.

Regarding masturbation there are several passages in the OT that mentions it directly, such as being unclean if you spill your seed. And yes, that would include when you're having sex too (see the story of Onan who spilled his seed outside of the woman and was struck dead by God).

Yes, but it is not "sex outside marriage" that is wrong it is "sex with cunt you don't own" is wrong. A man owns his daughters. .
>what Saul says is more important than what christ did
Was Christ circumcised or not?

Funny, I do eat shit. I've paid escorts to shit in my mouth in the past more than once. If God didn't want me to do that, he would have to tell me specifically. Do you see the problem?

Attached: 1531459873231.jpg (480x480, 36K)

Let us look at laws against pedophilia and arranged marriages.

Why is it that where one exists, the other doesn't?

Some say the reason laws against pedophilia exist is to protect "children", some children are 13 others are 18, depending on who you ask on what country you ask. I assume people who have ages of consent set at 18 think countries that have lower ages of consent to be populated by mentally scarred individuals, obviously... After all it's this we're preventing, right?

No.

The reason laws against pedophilia and arranged marriages do not coexist it's because both are solutions to the same problem: parents wanting to own the sex, the genetic makeup of their offspring, in turn their own genetic stock, to safeguard it and prevent their idiot sons and daughters, regardless of the age, from ruining it all and mixing with a "sub-person".

If you made laws ensuring parents greater control over the sexuality of their children, they would have them.

Fact is, just a few years back 14yr olds were getting married, living full happy lives, and these "mentally scarred individuals", these "pedophiles" were generating viable offspring.
In contrast you have today's society, having one child, probably retarded from old eggs and decades of artificial hormonal drugs, ending their lineage in a single generation. What contrast between health.

I'd rather marry a 14 yr old and have a full happy life than marry a woman who would birth retarded children. Pedophile or not, in this instance, and under the judgement of nature, I'd care little for the judgement of men.

But that is the thing: marriage. Marriage was a holy life commitment. Marrying a 14 yr old would be acceptable because everyone knew it was a real commitment.

Then sexual liberation came, divorces, sex as a means to achieve pleasure, objectification of the person you're fucking... Who would want that upon their son or daughter regardless of their age?

The Bible speaks greatly about fornicators.