If you consider whites to be "superior" to east asians, what are your reasons?

If you consider whites to be "superior" to east asians, what are your reasons?

Attached: map.png (800x472, 41K)

Other urls found in this thread:

telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/10132391/Riot-after-Chinese-teachers-try-to-stop-pupils-cheating.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

The ching chongs are an insectoid race severely lacking in creative abilities.

But how would compere these creative abilities?

Morality. Sage.

Define superior.

why is ireland so fucked? did the smartest among them all emigrate or are they just niggers? they have a lot of amazing writers so im inclined to believe the former

my big aryian cock

A lot of studies are showing that Asians both have higher iqs on average, and the genetic predisposition to alleles which cause intelligence at a higher rate than whites.

Why doesn't history show this? If this was the case, Japan, Korea and China would've been the heart of scientific and cultural innovation. But these 3 countries combined barely have more scientific discoveries than Poland historically.

When you combine the countries of Germany, France and the UK over a period of 500 years. Assuming without contact from Europe, East Asia would've taken millions of years to reach the same level of advancement, when considering this regions historical rate of advancement.

souls

It is pretty subjective, I know. I meant what features of white people makes you value them more, than other races, besides "They are my people".

Our culture gives us the edge.

There's a grain of truth to that whole "The Irish weren't considered white" narrative. They were definitely considered white, but they usually behave more like niggers than the average white man.

> Asian cartoons most popular worldwide for 3 decades.
> Asian games most popular worldwide for 4 decades.
> Japanese painter Hokusai probably top 10 world-reknown painters, single-handedly invented tentacle porn.
> Some of the most degenerate, creative types of pornography have come from Asia
> I Ching, Confucianism, Taoism are more popular in the West than any European philosophy of those eras

Fuck off you d&c shill. Whites & Asians will be allies once we deal with the China problem.

Attached: 848.png (659x525, 205K)

>twisted ripoffs of Disney animation
>twisted autistic ripoff of classic 90s RPGs
>Hokusai painted comics 200 years after Mona Lisa
>implying porn is not jewish invenion to trick West into degeneracy
>Eastern philosophy is basically 'bee yuzelf' in pretty colourful wrapping marketed to gaijins

they are insects

>Believing someone when they tell you their IQ score
X to doubt. Supposedly the west has been skimming the cream of the crop from Asian countries for a while now and yet their IQ scores here are only 105-110 here.

telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/10132391/Riot-after-Chinese-teachers-try-to-stop-pupils-cheating.html

So what caused that? I can think of:
1) lack of alphabetic writing in China
2) Lower verbal IQ leading to thinking in more "common sense" mode rather than systematic
3) Europe is full of peninsulas, so there was bigger incentive to explore world
4) Being fucked by steppe nomads
5) Centralization is bad (I am not sure), and Chinese geography encourages it
6) Some level of contrarianism and aggressiveness is necessary for innovations
In what way? Would westernized Asians like South Koreans be superior?

Attached: Captureqweqwe.png (873x491, 350K)

I think it's easier to say, a culture has been superior at [such-and-such], rather than to say one culture is superior overall.

Because to rate overall superiority, you have to rank certain values on a weighted scoring system, and there's going to be heavy bias that's based on the cultural values themselves, circular reasoning.

For example, a white culture might value exploration, military strength and music as important traits, and other things as unimportant, then use that to "prove" they are superior.

Meanwhile the asian ranking system will rank things like social harmony (low crime), intellect & poetry, and come to the conclusion that Asia is superior.

Both sides will argue about the other side: "Those things aren't important and don't make you superior to us."

It's all very retarded. Much easier to compare individual traits than overall capabilities.

Attached: 1534143323699.jpg (923x713, 62K)

Sure, but we can talk about who is better according to traits that we personally value. Instinctively, some of them seems less arbitrary.

It you are going to go the smart but stagnated explanation then the go to is the massive Chinese Examination system which was basically a standardized test to determine the middle class between the years 600-1400 or something. Tested your ability to memorize Confucius which requires intelligence(fluid memory) but doesn't require any critical thinking at all. I don't like this explanation because it doesn't explain IQ scores of the Koreas or Japan.

I consider myself to be superior to others, and I am White.

>Be South Korea
>Be Japan
>Be China
>Steal western technology and flagrantly violate patents for the past half century.
>Nooooo. We are just very smart
K brah

Nobel Peace is a fucking joke mate, only shills actually believe it's a real thing.

> Obama gets Nobel Peace prize 1 year into presidency simply for having African dna and dark skin complexion.

> Henry Kissinger got a peace prize for Vietnam. KEK

> As of 2017, Nobel Prizes[note 1] have been awarded to 902 individuals,[1] of whom 203 or 22.5% were Jews,[note 2] although the total Jewish population comprises less than 0.2% of the world's population [Wikipedia]

KEK

Attached: 1549747413170.jpg (1000x750, 158K)

For a yet unexplained reason East Asians underperform on integral metrics like economic or scientific output. I believe a Germanic or even a Slav country with Japanese average IQ would do better after reaching its full potential. I don't know what would be best for us as a society but high productivity gives people options.