Simon Wiesenthal Lied—and Admitted It, Says Top Israeli Holocaust Historian

Self-proclaimed “Nazi hunter” Simon Wiesenthal blatantly lied about the number of people allegedly killed in the Holocaust, and when confronted, he openly admitted it, Israel’s top Holocaust historian and editor of Yad Vashem’s Encyclopaedia of the Holocaust has announced.

Yehuda Bauer, professor of Holocaust Studies at the Avraham Harman Institute of Contemporary Jewry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, was commenting following a tweet by the Israeli Defense Force Spokesperson’s Unit that “11 million” people were killed in the Holocaust.

Yehuda Bauer, an Israeli Holocaust scholar who chairs the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, said he warned his friend Wiesenthal, who died in 2005, about spreading the false notion that the Holocaust claimed 11 million victims—6 million Jews and 5 million non-Jews.

“I said to him, ‘Simon, you are telling a lie,’” Bauer recalled in an interview Tuesday.

“He said, ‘Sometimes you need to do that to get the results for things you think are essential.’”

Bauer and other historians who knew Wiesenthal said the Nazi hunter told them that he chose the 5 million number carefully: He wanted a number large enough to attract the attention of non-Jews who might not otherwise care about Jewish suffering, but not larger than the actual number of Jews who were murdered in the Holocaust, 6 million.

barnesreview.org/simon-wiesenthal-lied-and-admitted-it-says-top-israeli-holocaust-historian/

jewishjournal.com/blogs/214321/remember-11-million-inflated-victims-tally-irks-holocaust-historians-times-israel/amp/

Why was this not a major news story, I wonder?

Attached: B19683CC-4D02-437D-9C1E-878C05A5E018.jpg (800x453, 63K)

Other urls found in this thread:

zionismunveiled.blogspot.com/2009/10/6-million-kabbalistic-number.html?m=1
forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=6017
wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/06/28/holocaust-gematria-the-kabbalah-and-the-significance-of-six-million/
thebirdman.org/Index/Jews/Jews-History&ScripturalOriginOfThe6MillionNumber.html
nytimes.com/1992/06/17/world/poland-agrees-to-change-auschwitz-tablets.html
youtube.com/watch?v=NSI5LkRGOKg
youtube.com/watch?v=2eoPCrjcz6Y
youtube.com/watch?v=9yGlH-9kZAg
youtube.com/watch?v=Ef1BehqAOzg
youtube.com/watch?v=MsuSU8DPwng
youtube.com/watch?v=j30sWIOMIak
drive.google.com/open?id=1ipWainshExGJPUfTmBwjLy9WVCWyZfAq
drive.google.com/open?id=1DyijBzaw9Tf9QXbyDFFvQX5c7HmUhXi_
holocausthandbooks.com/dl/FlyerLetterSize.pdf
codoh.com/library/categories/1167/
vho.org/Intro/GB/index.html
vho.org/GB/Books/dth/
holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?st=40&sort=voa&main_page=1#entries
forum.codoh.com/
forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=6513
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Old news. And he didn't lie, he exaggerated.

>he didn't lie, he exaggerated.

Attached: laugh.jpg (200x235, 11K)

Exaggeration like ... the 6 million.
>Is that right?

Nothing to see here goyim. Move along and don't forget about the 7 million!

hello fellow rabbi

There is a difference. If anything it's proof that the holocaust happened. If there weren't millions dead, then he wouldn't have been able to pull an easy 5 million out of his ass and get away with it. There must have been so many bodies that nobody would question the 11 million exaggeration.

Nah.
I mean, come on..
Come on guys, the truth would have gone out at this point..

zionismunveiled.blogspot.com/2009/10/6-million-kabbalistic-number.html?m=1

forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=6017

wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/06/28/holocaust-gematria-the-kabbalah-and-the-significance-of-six-million/

Attached: 9FD15D58-3B11-4BAA-85C4-2BC2F8808554.jpg (618x703, 132K)

"the fact that he admitted to being a liar about 5 million deaths PROVES he wasn't a liar about the other 6!"
ok there memeflag

hahahahahahahahaha

Attached: 1546284701444.png (1575x1302, 2.18M)

>6mil Jews
>5mil other
>6+5=11
I see no problem with his original statement

thebirdman.org/Index/Jews/Jews-History&ScripturalOriginOfThe6MillionNumber.html

Attached: C98A28FA-925C-488B-81D4-6D9AA62C4377.png (640x360, 232K)

How is this supporting your idea of holocaust denial? It clearly says that the dispute was around the number of non-Jewish deaths he attributed to the holocaust - not the number of Jewish deaths.
Plus it shows historians are not afraid to publicly denounce what they deem false historic information - even if it hurts something you'd consider part of the "Jewish cause".

No, no. The number of murdered Jews will ALWAYS be 6 million. It's the murdered goyim. They no longer count. No goyim were murdered by the evil Nazis. Only Jews were murdered by evil Nazis. And there were six million of them. Only the Jews can be victims. Remember that.

Attached: 1461773542951.png (720x776, 140K)

3 corners of a triangle + 3 corners of a triangle = 6 (grillions) = shekel

Attached: Jewish-Star.jpg (400x371, 23K)

Attached: k684UvS.png (1335x692, 1.07M)

It could be as simple as that. Six-pointed star, six million victims. Hocus pocus numerology.

REMINDER THAT ALL MEMEFLAGS ARE NIGGERS, KIKES, SHILLS, AND FAGGOTS.
DO NOT RESPOND TO KIKES MEMEFLAGS OR ANY MEMEFLAG POST OR THREADS

Attached: 1549325390226.png (625x344, 22K)

This is bait. The article says it's from 2017 and was uploaded 2 hours ago. CIA already knows who I am, but if they don't know you, don't follow the links.

I would say that it was rather the subconscious of "wiesenthal", which draw this number of 6 million out of his ass

That doesnt make a lick of sense.
Leaving aside the fact more Russians died in the war then everyone, the lesson here is one Jewish guy could make up a figure about the number of non-jews who died in 'Nazi death camps' and it was taught as dogma, BUT somehow 6 million Jews dying can not be doubted ever - even though there is no compelling reason to view that specific number as being accurate at all.

We are ALSO to believe the revision of the dead at Auschwitz applies, magically, only to non-Jews, and did not affect the 6 million figure - it is absomutely preposterous but such is Jewish power over our society 2+2=5 can exist.

>It was previously thought that four million died at the camps. More recent research has revealed the figure to be closer to 1.5 million.
nytimes.com/1992/06/17/world/poland-agrees-to-change-auschwitz-tablets.html

Quite a swing. Now imagine the pressure to not do any research that challenges the magic 6 million figure
>Imagine they even make it a crime to even DOUBT it.

Attached: 1F1A9B3B-5527-4A60-BE9C-31B15E2CAE7C.jpg (540x673, 95K)

>because they don't already know you after you posted on Jow Forums

Attached: 0B48D4D3-5FF1-4F08-AE25-8F98A6642E97.jpg (299x167, 9K)

Nobody said anything about the six million. We're talking about something substantial, with evidence, the five million that was admitted to being exaggerated. Go back to stormfront if you can't handle an adult conversation.

And just to see that right, my Jewish friend, this lie, like many others, will finally be your sling

Yes, of course, jews have been killed, as Jehovahs, gypsies, Poles, etc. ... what makes the Jews so special ??? nothing but there delusion that they are "the chosen ones" and their dominion over the media.

And just like in the Weimar Republic, this parasitic behavior will end ... can you you smell it? America slowly wakes up

Thanks for bumping, you creep.

Attached: lach.jpg (1275x873, 212K)

trips of truth

Attached: we_can_see_you_shilling_rabbi.png (1344x977, 362K)

I just call them flaggots and move on.

>Nobody said anything about the six million
except Wikipedia

Attached: Unbenannt.jpg (1545x333, 101K)

>If anything it's proof
My what a big nose you have there

Kids today.
This is old news. Very fucking old.

>CIA already knows who I am, but if they don't know you, don't follow the links.
I've seen this tactic a bunch of times: scare them away from checking into something themselves by drumming up fears of """them""" getting your info.
The worst I've EVER seen it was during the pizzagate fiasco. It was like day 2 of pizzagate and people started coming out of nowhere with
>you'd better not look at the wikipedia site for Madeleine Mccann! I did yesterday and today my boss told me I was fired. They'd searched my internet history and...blah blah
It's fucking obvious and pathetic

The souls of those who truly died during that time cry out for vengeance. Your lies dishonor them.

Attached: 1527315395074.jpg (1022x688, 176K)

Millions of people died. Maybe not a Gorillion, but millions died. You're not gonna bury that Truth. Hitler and his cont'd killed millions. Stalin and Mao killed tens of millions but Hitler and his crew murdered millions too.

It has been 2 years since pizza gate first surfaced, how's that going for you? Did you finally catch that elusive kill room basement labyrinth where Hillary rapes kids? Are you a targeted individual btw?

It's been real in his mind.

Attached: 1549687134383.jpg (710x644, 179K)

You fucking faggot - if a lie about 5 million can persist then so can a lie about 6.
And do you think no non-Jews died in Getman camps you revolting faggot?
Go back to Buzzfeed if you can't discuss interrelated topics without whining.

Attached: 5078845B-2BDD-4B78-B05E-13352228CD26.jpg (601x452, 140K)

David Cole estimates 3 million and he likely knows more than anyone on this thread.

The British gave a war guarentee instead of negotiating over 99% german city Danzig.

"Pat Buchanan - Churchill, Hitler, and The Unnecessary War"

"Hitler was right on the issue"

youtube.com/watch?v=NSI5LkRGOKg

youtube.com/watch?v=2eoPCrjcz6Y

youtube.com/watch?v=9yGlH-9kZAg

youtube.com/watch?v=Ef1BehqAOzg

youtube.com/watch?v=MsuSU8DPwng

Attached: Pat-Buchanan.jpg (868x1333, 176K)

As an aside the number of (((people))) who are infuriated by the mere mention of Pat Buchanan should tell you hes right about pretty much anything.

>about pretty much anything
pretty much everything.*

Unfortunately for you the arbitrary number of 5 non-Jews killed as part of the holocaust is not a historian claim :(

Here's an honest question. Say one million were murdered - half a million jews and half a million Poles, Jehovah's witnesses, etc, gentiles basically. Would it matter? Would NSDAP be any less of a criminal organization?

>“I said to him, ‘Simon, you are telling a lie,’” Bauer recalled in an interview Tuesday.
>“He said, ‘Sometimes you need to do that to get the results for things you think are essential.’”

I agree, we must never forget the 8 million!

Historian must be the most unscientific occupation. Its like being a "publicizer". Practically means nothing.

what thread are we sliding today rabbi?

MEMEFLAG, fucking always.

Only 6 Jews died in the holocaust

>It's been real in his mind.

youtube.com/watch?v=j30sWIOMIak

The world is ruled by power structures.
There is no such thing as an objective institution, so a Jewish narrative that supports Jewish causes and supports Jewish identity is, of course, not going to be studied objectively or honestly.
It will be pushed and promoted in a way that benefits Jews.

You're all still fascist scum, but people really need to stop falling for these lies.

I'm not even convinced any did

Ya, just fudge another million or 2 or maybe it was three, yes im sure it was 4 million and also another 2 million i forgot about. Just a little exaggeration never hurt.

Never forget

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
New Holohoax flyer -- print and disseminate

PDF: drive.google.com/open?id=1ipWainshExGJPUfTmBwjLy9WVCWyZfAq

PDF (Grayscale): drive.google.com/open?id=1DyijBzaw9Tf9QXbyDFFvQX5c7HmUhXi_

Large, text-heavy front-back flyer: holocausthandbooks.com/dl/FlyerLetterSize.pdf


IMPORTANT LINKS

>Documentaries
codoh.com/library/categories/1167/
(note: also search for Eric Hunt's documentaries on the Holocaust)

>Intro to Holocaust revisionism:
vho.org/Intro/GB/index.html

>Dissecting the Holocaust
vho.org/GB/Books/dth/

>Holocaust Handbook series
holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?st=40&sort=voa&main_page=1#entries

>Holocaust debate forum
forum.codoh.com/

>"Ninety-nine per cent of what we know [about the Holocaust in Auschwitz-Birkenau] we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove... it has become part of our inherited knowledge." (A Case for Letting Nature Take Back Auschwitz, The Toronto Star, December 27, 2009)

>"The consequence of the absence of any overt documentary evidence of gas chambers at these camps, coupled with the lack of archaeological evidence, means that reliance has to be placed on eye witness and circumstantial evidence." (Judge Gray, Irving-Lipstadt trial, 2000)

Attached: flyer-updated-map-questioning-2 (1).png (1626x2129, 452K)

- Dr. Horst Pelckmann, defense counsel for the SS at Nuremberg, exposed the fact that over 97% of the SS men who mentioned "The Jewish Problem" denied that it was to be solved by extermination. On 21 August 1946: "1,593 out of 1,637 affidavits which mention this problem state that the Jewish problem was not to be solved by killing" (IMT Proceedings, vol. 21, p. 368)

- On July 1945, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency reported that: "A report from the place where major German war criminals are now confined discloses that all of them have denied that the Nazis had any plans to exterminate the Jews of Europe."

- According to archives director Shmuel Krakowski: "Over half of the 20,000 testimonies from Holocaust survivors on record at Yad Vashem are “unreliable” and have never been used as evidence in Nazi war crimes trials" (B. Amouyal, "Doubts over evidence of camp survivors," Jerusalem Post (Israel), August 17, 1986)

- “Survivor accounts of critical events are typical of all testimony, that is, they are full of discrepancies. About all matters both trivial and significant, the evidence is nearly always in dispute. In part the unreliability of these accounts derives from imperfect observation and flawed memory, but in larger part from the circumstance that they are not constructed exclusively on the basis of firsthand experience. In order to present a coherent narrative, the author has likely included a large measure of hearsay, gossip, rumor, assumption, speculation, and hypothesis.” (Jewish holocaust historian Lucy Dawidowicz, A Holocaust Reader, 1976)


- "The consequence of the absence of any overt documentary evidence of gas chambers at these camps, coupled with the lack of archaeological evidence, means that reliance has to be placed on eye witness and circumstantial evidence." (Judge Gray, Irving-Lipstadt trial, 2000)

Attached: Holocaust_The_Greenville_News_April_1945_T.jpg (846x406, 138K)

The "Holocaust" is a racist, anti-White conspiracy theory

Indeed, it's interesting to see that those who accuse Revisionists of promoting a 'conspiracy theory' often promote truly bizarre conspiracy theories themselves, such as:

>"The Germans executed a secret plan to exterminate every Jew they could get their hands on, the results were such that 6M Jews and huge numbers of gypsies and homosexuals were murdered by gassing and by being shot into enormous pits."

Yet in short, there are no orders from Hitler, no authentic German documents, no records of funding, no massive graves of human remains as alleged which would necessarily be available, and a gassing method which defies science.


At the Nuremberg Military Tribunals (NMT) it was alleged that the Holocaust had been perpetrated with the greatest level of secrecy, and very few know it was even happening. According to US Judge Leon Powers "not over 100 people in all were informed" about the attempted extermination. As with many other conspiracy theories, the lack of physical evidence and the scarcity of alleged eyewitness testimonies were seen as convincing proof that the Nazis had something to hide and that they had successfully managed to do it.


Pennsylvania judge Edward L. Van Roden:
>"This solitary confinement proved sufficient in itself in some cases to persuade the Germans to sign prepared statements. These statements not only involved the signer, but often would involve other defendants. Our investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head and then punch him in the face with rubber hose. Many of the German defendants had teeth knocked out. Some had their jaws broken. All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was Standard Operating Procedure with American investigators."

Attached: Holocaust-Nuremberg-trials-April-1949-Judge-Leon-W-Powers.jpg (1374x1110, 762K)

While researching history, our highest goal must be at all times to discover how it actually was. Historians should not place research in the service of making criminal accusations against, for example, Genghis Khan & the Mongol hordes, nor to whitewash any of their wrong-doings. Anybody insisting that research be barred from exonerating Genghis Khan of criminal accusations would be the object of ridicule and would be subject to the suspicion that he was, in fact, acting out of political motives. If this were not so, why would anyone insist that our historical view of Genghis Khan forever be defined solely by Khan's victims and enemies?

The same reasoning applies to Hitler and Nazis. Both revisionists and their adversaries are entitled to their political views. The accusation that revisionists are only interested in exonerating Nazis and that such an effort is reprehensible or even criminal, is a boomerang: This accusation has as a prerequisite that it is deemed unacceptable to partially exonerate Nazis historically, and by so doing, always also morally.

But by declaring any hypothetical exoneration based on possible facts as unacceptable, one admits openly not to be interested in the quest for the truth, but in incriminating Nazis historically and morally under any circumstances and at all costs. And the motivation behind this can only be political. Hence, those accusing revisionists to misuse their research for political ends have themselves been proven guilty of exactly this offense. It is therefore not necessarily the revisionists who are guided by political motives--though quite a few of them certainly are--but with absolute certainty all those who accuse others of attempting to somehow historically exonerate a political system which has long since disappeared.

Attached: extermination-camp-map.jpg (1600x1100, 1.21M)

The typical canard used by Jews is to claim that Revisionists "deny" the existence of everything about the Jews' experience in WWII, the camps etc. But no one says what the Jews claim, it's a classic false, strawman argument.

Revisionists do not "deny" that Jews were deported to labor camps and encouraged to leave Europe. There is no question that the National Socialists wanted the Jews out of Europe. The Zionists also wanted the Jews out of Europe.

What Revisionists do deny is:

- the unfounded and frankly, laughable '6,000,000'
- the ridiculous & irrational allegations of homicidal 'gas chambers'
- the unsubstantiated claim of a state planned genocide of Jews

The response to anyone who asks if you "deny" the so-called holocaust is to ask them to define what they mean by the 'holocaust'. If any of those 3 items are part of that definition, then say: 'yes, then I am a denier and you can't prove that any of those points are fact...next'.

Attached: what-holocaust-deniers-believe.png (565x616, 67K)

>meme flags come back
>israeli flags dissapear
Hmmmm..

>And he didn't lie, he exaggerated.
Ahahahahaha.
Fuck off cunt. That shit was in my history book growing up. Blatent God damn lie.
We also heard about the holocoasters and other weird shit.

Berlin wasn't liberated by the Allies. If not even that is correctly displayed, how can I believe the rest of the information?

>meme flag
EVERY FUCKING TIME

Attached: 1546481005078.jpg (655x643, 79K)

>how can I believe the rest of the information?

What is there not to believe? Do the research yourself, all the camps liberated by the US and Britain were found to NOT have gas chambers... in spite of testimonies claiming there were gassings

The map legend says "Camps liberated by" not "cities liberated by" so it's not even wrong, really.


On 1 October 1948, Commander Anton Muller and his second-in-command, Emil Lachout, sent the following memo from Vienna to all interested parties:

>Military Police Service
>Circular Letter No. 31/48.
>Vienna, 1 Oct. 1948.
>10th dispatch.

>1. The Allied Commissions of Inquiry have so far established that no people were killed by poison gas in the following concentration camps: Bergen-Belsen, Buchenwald, Dachau, Flossenburg, Gross-Rosen, Mauthausen and its satellite camps, Natzweiler, Neuengamme, Niederhagen (Wewelsburg), Ravensbruck, Sachsenhausen, Stutthof, Theresienstadt.

>In those cases, it has been possible to prove that confessions had been extracted by torture, and that testimonies were false. This must be taken into account when conducting investigations and interrogations with respect to war crimes. The result of this investigation should be brought to the cognizance of former concentration camp inmates who at the time of the hearings testified about the murder of people, especially Jews, with poison gas in those concentration camps. Should they insist on their statements, charges are to be brought against them for making false statements.

Just do the research yourself. Research every single alleged "death camp" (there are only supposedly six) and see who liberated them.

Americans and British allowed autopsies at the camps, and the doctors confirmed nobody died of poison gassing.

Read on:
forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=6513