"user, is it true that you deny the holocaust?"

>clears throat
>ahem, can I have everyone's attention
>I do not deny that a major crime was committed against many of the non germanic peoples in areas occupied by the Third Reich, but I wouldn't qualify it as a holocaust nor do I believe that the figure of people killed, as the direct result of National Socialist Party's political action, exceeded one million. Inspection of all relevant evidence clearly shows that said number includes a wast number of combatants, armed partisans, people killed as a result of collective punishment, saboteurs, propagandists, foreign agents, agitators, deserters and such.
>It is more or less a widely known fact that advancing Allied armies would excavate entire cemeteries and deposit the remains in the so called *extermination camps* like Auschwitz, Treblinka or Sobibor, which would later be photographed and disseminated for propaganda purposes. As such I deny and and all invocations of holocaust as an moniker of supreme crimes against humanity and prefer the more accurate term: *the significant loss of civilian life during the 1939-1944 armed conflict* or SILCILDAC39-44 for short.
>also
>ahem
>fuck trannies
>fuck niggers
>and most of all
>fuck jannies

Attached: 1541810026936.png (332x332, 126K)

imagine the smell

How could I deny it, Stacy?
I believe in it so much I would have to see it happening again before my eyes so I could fully grasp those impressive and never again achieved genocidal numbers.

Yes. I don't believe a lot of lies that many people unquestionably take for fact. Just cause Hollywood made a movie about it does not make it reality sweetie.

>is it true that you deny the holocaust?
I denied it once in a video game chat and got band for 2 weeks.

Imagine all those feet smothering your face

Attached: image.jpg (800x450, 96K)

Attached: Boobs_Ass.png (1000x1000, 67K)

why a coven prostituting initiates?

Yes it's true girls and I'll prove it, let me open up 4chins and show you. Oh right the goys aren't even gonna believe me... Someone get two dozens pieces of paper and write today's date on it don't ask why right now

he cute

Attached: 1542313317768m.jpg (1024x888, 46K)

nice floweys

Attached: image.jpg (679x486, 53K)

Yeah and? I've gotten weird looks, but nothing I cant handle. I've literally had to redpill normies in these parties before, and on the night of I still got laid. So what? The holohaux is a myth, and the actual number is less than 100,000, and they died because of other things, not because of deliberately planned murder. Hell, I dont even have to post anything. I can use logic: Why is it that everybody who says something against it...is kicked out of their organizations or worse? Why are they jailed? WHy is holocaust denial a crime? Why is it not investigated? What are the speech laws for? Why do things always happen to those who question it? Fuck off OP

Yep.
*unzips penis*

Well yes of course because I'm a national socialist but I'm not a strasserist so you're looking at the right guy. We can talk about it more perhaps?

>I don’t deny it’s going to happen

Wtf based

>"I mean who doesn't wanna gas all the jews right girls?"

Attached: 8B1BF543-9E62-42AF-8A68-A84531411529.jpg (259x373, 23K)

Let me tell you about the filthy jews, ladies...

Das rite, call da cops, i don givafuk

no, I don't.

I just don't like the weird obsession with this particular genocide for obvious current political reasons, while actively ignoring the murder of 6 million Ukrainians and 1.3 million Kazakhs in the 30s to exterminate nationalist movements in those countries.

BASED

no, i don't. yet not everything you hear about it is true.

Hell yeah

> brb

Attached: window bernd.jpg (467x700, 178K)

HOLD ON...
*unzips dick*
..all the time

yes, now let me grab your tits hayley

No.

If you hussies don't stop looking at me I'm going to diarrhea all over this table

No I wouldn't say that I'm DENYING it so to speak, it's not like Germany built concentration camps for shits and giggles. However, there is tons of evidence that supports that the numbers are vastly exaggerated.

I've been openly natsoc for the last 15 years of my life and only a couple people confronted me about it. Everyone else just took it normally.

Especially girls, they're the most easiest to convince if you know what you're talking about. All girls I dated were liberal or neutral at the beginning, but EVERY SINGLE ONE of them ended up being redpilled after a few months.

You don't shape yourself around women, you shape women around you.

Attached: 1454669537387.jpg (498x480, 58K)

guess which one is the fat one

Yes. Now fuck off, kike.

Wow this is the first photo of a bunch of white girls I’ve seen in a while without any niggers, spics or insects hanging about. Looks comfy.

Too many words, normies can barely piece it together

Attached: 1506961377622.png (758x631, 187K)

No I deny that Hitler was a good person he cause unlimited victim card

>leaf
>complete fucking retard
checks out

> Wyborowa and Hortex on the table

Polish girls ask never such stupid questions.

Attached: 10215814373_3d1b278cb2_b.jpg (1024x768, 348K)

Oh it’s like that?

Attached: 7392C117-10A4-4271-A0D6-341206E3A695.gif (800x450, 2.59M)

pilled and basted

Everyone of those thots fucks big black nigger cocks. Everyone of them will birth a Ork Nigger mutt shit baby.

Attached: 1494114238027.jpg (540x534, 67K)

>Roasted by a bosnian

Attached: 1545243781670.png (1000x1006, 755K)

>Yes, but I can't deny there are JUICE (Jews) in the world! *points at juice on table*
>*turns around*
>*slips on unfastened velcro shoe straps*

yes
>all fields
>hide thread

Here in Finland, that's just an average bunch of girls taking a group photo. Unless you're living in Cucksinki, then it would have a negro or 3 in it.

Not necessarily. Those girls just might have an outgoing and happy personality, doesn't have to be a degeneracy

>america has entered the chat

Attached: SopranosLaugh.png (1920x1080, 2.46M)

This. Also I think it's the soc in natsoc that eases them in at first.

that's because you literally live in a black country. im sure the "liberal" founding fathers would be happy

forgot pic. this could've been you, murica

Attached: girlls.jpg (960x882, 114K)

Imagine being stuck on an island with all of them
that would be great
all of them fighting for your attention

I, too am a socialist, albeit, a more nationalist kind.

>unzips penis

checked. or just imagine a situation where 25% of all men died. it would change the dynamic completely

>posts a bunch of jewesses
Fuck off to reddlt

>hortex
Touche.

those are hungarianesses

Attached: 1549560323421.jpg (960x1280, 294K)

>not downing your drink and throwing out a roman
At that point you might as well

Why would you have picture frames blocking the books you never read though?

I don't discuss important things like philosophy, history, or politics with holes

Nah. I'm not crazy. I'm just saying we don't actually know how many were killed. And above all we don't know how many died as a result of the Germans actions and how many died as a result of German infrastructure and industry being bombed to bits. Most people just know the history of the holocaust from Schindler's list but that movie is way exaggerated because if it had shown the actual history it would just have been to boring.

unironically based and redpilled

I read that in Pewdiepies voice.

Attached: Pewdiepie Man in the high tower feminist hanging.png (891x704, 656K)

>no niggers
>polish books
>no tattoos
>no painted eyebrows
this is not america

Attached: 1547747081466.jpg (460x404, 93K)

wots a holucost pls?

Fuck off bitch
Suck my dick

No, in fact I wish that Nazi Germany had won the war.

Ladies, just like the amount of people who died in the holocaust, the rumors of my holocaust denial are greatly exaggerated

BASED

Attached: fuck jannies!.webm (960x540, 700K)

I'll believe it about the 3 on the right, because they actually look Russian. But the 2 on left = 100% kike

Hmm, as tempting as that would be, not sure if taking advice from Satan herself is smart...

Is it true that you deny basic math?

Attached: Scarfacegiphy.gif (500x176, 1012K)

They went back to browsing their phones and talking about boys after the 3rd sentence.

How can I deny 33 millions of Russian deaths?

>taking Jow Forums seriously
>ever
mfw

Attached: 1544147609377.gif (280x211, 1.92M)

Ladies. The truth is it happened, and that the Jews entirely deserved it.

Now please proceed to drop your underwear and bend over or else this knife will be going into each and every one of your necks.

This

Honestly if you are:
>tall
>not ugly
>funny
>intelligent
>assertive
Then you can just openly say whatever you want to groups of women and they just love it. You can't be full 14/88 all day everyday, but you can casually joke/talk about gassing Jews and electrocuting gay people. Its actually kind of insane the shit I get away with saying.

Lol this happened to me I just did a 360 and said no I do

should've held your ground, puss

>packistan
>party
>got laid
No

they have lots of secret parties with alcohol in pakistan, my sister's coworkers revealed

Question EVERYTHING!!

I am not allowed to comment that, ladies.

Attached: 1499224856439.jpg (838x556, 60K)

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
New Holohoax flyer -- print and disseminate

PDF: drive.google.com/open?id=1ipWainshExGJPUfTmBwjLy9WVCWyZfAq

PDF (Grayscale): drive.google.com/open?id=1DyijBzaw9Tf9QXbyDFFvQX5c7HmUhXi_

Large, text-heavy front-back flyer: holocausthandbooks.com/dl/FlyerLetterSize.pdf

IMPORTANT LINKS

>Documentaries
codoh.com/library/categories/1167/
(note: also search for Eric Hunt's documentaries on the Holocaust)

>Intro to Holocaust revisionism:
vho.org/Intro/GB/index.html

>Dissecting the Holocaust
vho.org/GB/Books/dth/

>Holocaust Handbook series
holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?st=40&sort=voa&main_page=1#entries

>Holocaust debate forum
forum.codoh.com/

>"Ninety-nine per cent of what we know [about the Holocaust in Auschwitz-Birkenau] we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove... it has become part of our inherited knowledge." (A Case for Letting Nature Take Back Auschwitz, The Toronto Star, December 27, 2009)

>"The consequence of the absence of any overt documentary evidence of gas chambers at these camps, coupled with the lack of archaeological evidence, means that reliance has to be placed on eye witness and circumstantial evidence." (Judge Gray, Irving-Lipstadt trial, 2000)

Attached: flyer-updated-map-questioning-2 (1).png (1626x2129, 452K)

- Dr. Horst Pelckmann, defense counsel for the SS at Nuremberg, exposed the fact that over 97% of the SS men who mentioned "The Jewish Problem" denied that it was to be solved by extermination. On 21 August 1946: "1,593 out of 1,637 affidavits which mention this problem state that the Jewish problem was not to be solved by killing" (IMT Proceedings, vol. 21, p. 368)

- On July 1945, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency reported that: "A report from the place where major German war criminals are now confined discloses that all of them have denied that the Nazis had any plans to exterminate the Jews of Europe."

- According to archives director Shmuel Krakowski: "Over half of the 20,000 testimonies from Holocaust survivors on record at Yad Vashem are “unreliable” and have never been used as evidence in Nazi war crimes trials" (B. Amouyal, "Doubts over evidence of camp survivors," Jerusalem Post (Israel), August 17, 1986)

- “Survivor accounts of critical events are typical of all testimony, that is, they are full of discrepancies. About all matters both trivial and significant, the evidence is nearly always in dispute. In part the unreliability of these accounts derives from imperfect observation and flawed memory, but in larger part from the circumstance that they are not constructed exclusively on the basis of firsthand experience. In order to present a coherent narrative, the author has likely included a large measure of hearsay, gossip, rumor, assumption, speculation, and hypothesis.” (Jewish holocaust historian Lucy Dawidowicz, A Holocaust Reader, 1976)

- "The consequence of the absence of any overt documentary evidence of gas chambers at these camps, coupled with the lack of archaeological evidence, means that reliance has to be placed on eye witness and circumstantial evidence." (Judge Gray, Irving-Lipstadt trial, 2000)

Attached: Holocaust_The_Greenville_News_April_1945_T.jpg (846x406, 138K)

The "Holocaust" is a racist, anti-White conspiracy theory

Indeed, it's interesting to see that those who accuse Revisionists of promoting a 'conspiracy theory' often promote truly bizarre conspiracy theories themselves, such as:

>"The Germans executed a secret plan to exterminate every Jew they could get their hands on, the results were such that 6M Jews and huge numbers of gypsies and homosexuals were murdered by gassing and by being shot into enormous pits."

Yet in short, there are no orders from Hitler, no authentic German documents, no records of funding, no massive graves of human remains as alleged which would necessarily be available, and a gassing method which defies science.

At the Nuremberg Military Tribunals (NMT) it was alleged that the Holocaust had been perpetrated with the greatest level of secrecy, and very few know it was even happening. According to US Judge Leon Powers "not over 100 people in all were informed" about the attempted extermination. As with many other conspiracy theories, the lack of physical evidence and the scarcity of alleged eyewitness testimonies were seen as convincing proof that the Nazis had something to hide and that they had successfully managed to do it.

Pennsylvania judge Edward L. Van Roden:
>"This solitary confinement proved sufficient in itself in some cases to persuade the Germans to sign prepared statements. These statements not only involved the signer, but often would involve other defendants. Our investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head and then punch him in the face with rubber hose. Many of the German defendants had teeth knocked out. Some had their jaws broken. All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was Standard Operating Procedure with American investigators."

Attached: Holocaust-Nuremberg-trials-April-1949-Judge-Leon-W-Powers.jpg (1374x1110, 762K)

While researching history, our highest goal must be at all times to discover how it actually was. Historians should not place research in the service of making criminal accusations against, for example, Genghis Khan & the Mongol hordes, nor to whitewash any of their wrong-doings. Anybody insisting that research be barred from exonerating Genghis Khan of criminal accusations would be the object of ridicule and would be subject to the suspicion that he was, in fact, acting out of political motives. If this were not so, why would anyone insist that our historical view of Genghis Khan forever be defined solely by Khan's victims and enemies?

The same reasoning applies to Hitler and Nazis. Both revisionists and their adversaries are entitled to their political views. The accusation that revisionists are only interested in exonerating Nazis and that such an effort is reprehensible or even criminal, is a boomerang: This accusation has as a prerequisite that it is deemed unacceptable to partially exonerate Nazis historically, and by so doing, always also morally.

But by declaring any hypothetical exoneration based on possible facts as unacceptable, one admits openly not to be interested in the quest for the truth, but in incriminating Nazis historically and morally under any circumstances and at all costs. And the motivation behind this can only be political. Hence, those accusing revisionists to misuse their research for political ends have themselves been proven guilty of exactly this offense. It is therefore not necessarily the revisionists who are guided by political motives--though quite a few of them certainly are--but with absolute certainty all those who accuse others of attempting to somehow historically exonerate a political system which has long since disappeared.

Attached: extermination-camp-map.jpg (1600x1100, 1.21M)

The typical canard used by Jews is to claim that Revisionists "deny" the existence of everything about the Jews' experience in WWII, the camps etc. But no one says what the Jews claim, it's a classic false, strawman argument.

Revisionists do not "deny" that Jews were deported to labor camps and encouraged to leave Europe. There is no question that the National Socialists wanted the Jews out of Europe. The Zionists also wanted the Jews out of Europe.

What Revisionists do deny is:

- the unfounded and frankly, laughable '6,000,000'
- the ridiculous & irrational allegations of homicidal 'gas chambers'
- the unsubstantiated claim of a state planned genocide of Jews

The response to anyone who asks if you "deny" the so-called holocaust is to ask them to define what they mean by the 'holocaust'. If any of those 3 items are part of that definition, then say: 'yes, then I am a denier and you can't prove that any of those points are fact...next'.

Attached: what-holocaust-deniers-believe.png (565x616, 67K)