I left this shithole for 2 months and came back now to scour through to see if there's anything worthwile...

I left this shithole for 2 months and came back now to scour through to see if there's anything worthwile. And it's all shit. Let's have a quality thread for redpills and book recommendations

Attached: thirdposition.png (742x960, 352K)

Other urls found in this thread:

duckduckgo.com/?q=gun control in nazy germany
politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/26/ben-carson/fact-checking-ben-carson-nazi-guns/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_legislation_in_Germany#Gun_regulation_of_the_Third_Reich
youtu.be/o7h8k1gB-tI
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_certificate
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Way
de.wikisource.org/wiki/Waffengesetz_(1938)?
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

The Vampire Economy

Attached: 1542179478931.jpg (986x1300, 410K)

your "third position" is just socialism without an ideological bent, the state will seize whatever it needs but leave you alone if it doesnt need your means of production right this very moment. its very exciting. never know when the fuhrer is going to claim your shop. love living on the edge

Attached: 1516798505325-1.jpg (628x682, 166K)

You're right, pure fascism would fit better

The real redpill is realizing that natsoc is just monarchy-lite

Fun fact: Democrats and other various left wing parties around the world, still to this day try to represent the tird position, the just tend to call it something else. Like the "Third way", or "democratic socialism".

>The real redpill is realizing that natsoc is just monarchy-lite
Are you retarded?

No Monarch was ever as greedy and as tyranical as the King People of various -isms run by fucking plebs.

Third positionism was developed in Italy from the writtings of Evola. Democrats are capitalists just like Republicans, the two parties are very close on the political spectrum.

>All major parties are the same
>My form of socialism is different.

It can't be helped, you are from a former communist country, You are hardly better than the morons calling anyone right of Stalin a Nazi.

Roflmao how new are you?

(02)
>reCAPTCHA is shitting on my hardened Firefox

Attached: 60_shill_ways (01).jpg (2182x1635, 826K)

not sure if I've been brainwashed by kike propaganda or not, but I'm pretty sure I've read that they banned guns when they cam to power. Do you have a (non-kike) source on this?

(03)
>fuck jewgle and fuck jewglish people

Attached: 60_shill_ways (02).jpg (2182x1635, 801K)

You know what third positionism is right? Rejection of capitalism AND socialism. Jesus you're retarded

we're in the Jow Forums was never good phase of the death of this board

third position - lol

Read "The Dictators Handbook" you stupid Chipsy. The Nazi Officials filled their pockets and i I never made a point to the contrary.

you never read any of these search results you dumb cunt who the fuck do you think you are you filthy mongoloid that you can somehow tell me stuff about my country in a third language you dumb cunt.

dont listen to those retards, theres literally a book written about it called gun control in the third reich. they are the ones who are brainwashed

Why are you asking me to disprove your wrongbelieves from a source of your liking. Do your own fucking research you read the bullshit up in the first place so why don't you question the bullshit you read up on yourself.

politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/26/ben-carson/fact-checking-ben-carson-nazi-guns/

Even kiked sources admit it now. Can't screenshot. Big brother says you gotta pay that click to see it

>i have no arguments and i must scream
simply epic my kraut friend

>Description of the book
>that attest to restrictions on firearm ownership for Jews and enemies of the state.

does not disprove anything i said

See
Sorry but leftists outed this outright peice of propaganda so it couldn't be used against them in gun debates anymore.

Not quite, The commies "running" the Weimar Republic made it difficult to own guns, the Nazis when they took over, "loosened" access to guns in the way all socialists do. Rights for me but not for thee. Members off the Nazi party were allowed to have firearms and barely anyone else, a policy the continued when they took over other countries.

so no source, eh?
ok

Members of the German Reich*

I gave you a fucking source

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_legislation_in_Germany#Gun_regulation_of_the_Third_Reich

This link is for all you dumb cunts so that the chipsies don't get the misleading impression someone did some work for them because they are just lazy.

that article is about carson saying how holocaust happened because of gun control which is not the topic here. can you even read? moreover, did you even read the article?

Not true. The weapons affected by gun regulations were Pistols, not rifles. Anyone could buy a rifle if he wasn't a fucking subversive as soon as he was 18.

I mean I know you’re just a retarded gipsy, but that’s literally common knowledge and official history. Pick up a book you brown retard

Did you even read? In 1938 Nazis changed the law from the heavily regulated registry left behind by Weimar to a much more lax requirement from members of the riech. Still relevant. Still a super Jews source admitting it.

You start with old memes. Surely you got some enlightenment from your two month sabbatical? But as red pills go the absolute state of modern surveillance is so far beyond normie understanding: youtu.be/o7h8k1gB-tI

Attached: oiwuottkbdhkgbqtd69s.jpg (800x449, 17K)

thanks for doing the work for me, kraut
I'll send you more free gypsies on your way to wagecuck for them

Attached: 123214241512.png (200x200, 91K)

Just admit your wrong. I can say with 100% certainty gun laws were much stricter both in the Weimar republic and after the war

Moreover not being able to pick relevant information from a pile of irrelevant garbage is a nigger trait. What're you doin in Finland Mohammed?

I have no problem admitting I was wrong, but these retards started chimping out like I fucked their mother. That being said, I wasn't completely wrong cause the truth is more or less as this guy said

Yeah, people don’t like smartasses that talk out of their asses. Imagine that, huh.
Everyone that wanted guns could have guns with ease, except gypsies, jews, and other barely humans.

Third positionism is a "rejection" of both by being the idealistic moron and trying to marry the best parts of two comepletely incompatible systems.

I specifically adressed this argument in my second greentext.
If you actually look into third positionalists, they all eventually end up saying the same thing or words to the same effect, from Hitler to Tony Blair. "My socialism is different from what everyone thinks socialism is"

They don't seem to work exclusively. Because Khazarian inbreeders keep snaking the royal lines

Attached: 170630-Monarchy-GettyImages-697139196.jpg (1500x844, 318K)

Bill Clinton made the Third Way basically making a criminal corporate war mongering cartel. DemSoc is just Fabian Socialism which is the European model.

Attached: Funny-Jim-Carrey-Meme-Oh-Really-How-Interesting-Picture.jpg (625x425, 62K)

He's wrong that he said members of the nazi party, I believe it was german citizens with aryan certificates
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_certificate

No, no its not. Read up on third poisitionism before you embarrass yourself

No guns for Jews

Attached: nash6.jpg (249x375, 15K)

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Way
THIS is the third way. Its NOT third positionism

And my great grandfather lived in Germany until 1937 so I know gun laws were looser than they were before and after

>Third Position is an ideology that was developed in the late 20th century by political parties including Terza Posizione in Italy and Troisième Voie in France. It emphasizes opposition to both communism and capitalism. Advocates of Third Position politics typically present themselves as "beyond left and right" while syncretizing ideas from each end of the political spectrum, usually reactionary right-wing cultural views and radical left-wing economic views.

If you do not understand what syncretizing means.

>Syncretic politics, or spectral-syncretic, refers to politics that combine elements from across the conventional left–right political spectrum. The term "syncretic politics" has been derived from the idea of syncretism (syncretic religion).[1] The main idea of syncretic politics is that taking political positions of neutrality by combining elements associated with the left and right can achieve a goal of reconciliation

One fatal flaw, third positionism sees itself as above the left and the right. Read Julius Evola, third positionism was derived from his writtings. Their goal isn't a combination of right and left, its a rejection of them

My first post in this thread adressed this. You are on Jow Forums for fuck sake, you should be well aware who anything with even a slight link to Nazis will get torpedoed.

They come up with different names, for the same core ideology to try and sneak the same flawed and tired ideas past unsuspecting retards.

their goal can be whatever but the truth is it always resulted in social and economic authoritarianism, social authoritarianism isnt part of the left-right spectrum as anyone can implement their own version of that but economic authoritarianism is by definition far-left. this is the equivalent of saying real communism has never been tried which is true because its simply impossible

Self perception is meaningless.
I can see myself as the King of England, doesn't make it true.
The reality of the situation is that Third Postionialism attempts to combine left and right wing politics, specifically right wing social views and left wing economic views and it ends in disaster.

sorry, Jow Forums is right again

Attached: file.png (745x372, 24K)

They reject the right left dichotomy, the political spectrum is a very recent social construct it's not self perception in the slightest to reject it. You can't even define it clearly and some ideologies fit in neither left ir right, you can't define ideologies on a fucking 2D surface

see
But I agree with your point on economic authoritarianism to an extent

Bump

no ideology fits either the left or the right because every ideology is more than just its economic policy. which is why the simple way to portray politics isnt with a singular axis but with two of them, the other referring to social policy on the spectrum of libertarian to authoritarian. there is no "third position" as any economic policy in the modern era is inevitably a mixture of competition and cooperation, or right and left. social policy is wholly independent from this, although some social policies usually go along with certain economic ones. your third position is simply an usual mix of economic and social policies not often seen together

>an usual
an unusual*

>I left this shithole for 2 months
Off topic but how did you manage to stay off here for 2 months? I've tried but I thought quitting porn was easier.

fence sitting is fucking stupid.

basically just a bunch of smug cunts thinking that being central/third position means you're enlightened by not leaning one way or the other because of some dumb reason or not wanting to cause violence or offence.

Reality is most centrists either don't want to upset people or don't have confidence in their ideas so they just try to compromise all the time like a coward.

Attached: centrist_in_a_nutshell.jpg (640x469, 46K)

"centrist" in todays political climate means someone who is not socially authoritarian nor economically extremist. it is a very well defined political position and only an ideologue would see it as fence-sitting since ideologues can only see themselves and the other extreme they oppose

>mixing third positionism with centrism
You aussies should stop mixing with the aboriginals.

Third positonists are not centrists. If you were to place them on a compass they would be either far right or far left, depending on which definition of each you accept

read the writings of antiquity, and machiavelli, his commentary on livy are importante,
also polybios histories are a good read, book 6 is very interesting

nothing new happens under the sun

you were allowd, the nazis lowered gun ownership requirements for germans, the only took weapons from kikes and gipsys

it's on wikipedia retard, you are able to find it if you found Jow Forums

yep gun control is only evul when it happens to (((them)))

I don't know really, it just sort of clicked when this place was getting too shit and I saw I was spending too much time here and not spending it on something more valuable so I just got off and stayed off and didn't think about it too much

when you get your real life in order you stop needing or even receiving the dopamine rush that comes from participating in discussions about grand conspiracies that other people are too stupid to realize

Already read quite a bit from ancient greece

it's very delightful , isn't it?
to see that greece already was a microcosm of what overcame us, in many things, but we have additional elements and other strengths than them,
also they did not knew about the fall of the great rome. polybios it seems could not imagine rome falling anytime, as the romans in his era were of the latin blood, of one tribe and determined to rule the world like a mill grinds wheat the romans army seemingly grinded the whole world slowly but surely down, to rule them

Imagine not only being this insecure, but also this retarded.

Here, I illustrated it for you, you mongoloid. The red dots represent political views on different topics for a single individual.

Attached: 12121.png (255x344, 5K)

>OH GAWD PLZ DEBATE ME

pathetic.

Welcome back
>HONK

Attached: 4B594DA3-4888-43E7-84E4-44E9E455BBC7.jpg (1013x1680, 367K)

bump

Attached: 125616762374234.jpg (645x729, 48K)

Better version. There are also cool versions with a cross and a crown instead of a swastika.

Attached: reject the false dichotomy.png (2550x3300, 290K)

That symbol looks familiar but I can't really put it anywhere

Why don't you read the actual source: de.wikisource.org/wiki/Waffengesetz_(1938)?

It's a myth that you couldn't buy guns in the Third Reich. For German citizens it was easier to acquire guns than in the Weimar years or than it is nowadays.