He's going to sign it, but you guys are acting like this is a win because he will also declare a national emergency. 1: The bill is terrible & he should not sign it 2: By using national emergency this way it can be stonewalled in the courts 3: By using national emergency this way it will set a precedent that will allow other presidents to do the same, making it easier to abuse this feature, such as a democrat using national emergency to gun-grab 4: Why bother with the wall at all if the bill includes all these back doors to allow people to get amnesty, traffic people in, and such things as that. Anyone want to explain to me how signing this is "winning" and not letting all of his supporters down?
Liam Parker
HOPEFULLY THE BILL DIES IN THE HOUSE AND WE GET THE NE ANYWAY.
>She said >next democrat president is definitely calling gun violence a national emergency now. >take that orange man >Paraphrasing, of coarse Lol, yeah, doesn't work like that you dusty cunt.
>(via DailyCaller) In a series of Tuesday evening tweets, the president seemed to set the stage for signing the deal, asserting that he can get money for border security from “other sources.”
>“Was just presented the concept and parameters of the Border Security Deal by hard working Senator Richard Shelby. Looking over all aspects knowing that this will be hooked up with lots of money from other sources,” Trump wrote.
>Will be getting almost $23 BILLION for Border Security. Regardless of Wall money, it is being built as we speak!”
>The president did not say specifically where he would be able to drum up $23 billion for border security, but Acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney argued Sunday that “there are certain funds of money that [Trump] can get to without declaring a national emergency and other funds that he can only get to after declaring a national emergency.”
$23 BILLION OF WALL IN NATIONAL EMERGENCY MONEY WOOT WOOT
> Anyone want to explain to me how signing this is "winning" and not letting all of his supporters down?
It's not. Magatards are just that, fucking retarded. This is Reagan amnesty all over again.
We didn't deserve Nixon, he was too good a president.
Wyatt Reyes
>2: By using national emergency this way it can be stonewalled in the courts Wrong. There are over a dozen national emergencies currently active, including the one declared after 9/11. Courts don't interfere with these declarations.
This. Holy fucking shit, the retarded pedes here were trashing this shitty bill not even two threads ago yet suddenly want to suck it's cock. This bill will KILL maga forever, it's a literal amnesty bill and anti-maga bill.
Christopher Gonzalez
the child trafficking thing is the unredeemable poison, for me >Section 224(a) prohibits the deportation of anyone who is sponsoring an “unaccompanied” minor illegal alien – or who says they might sponsor a UAC, or lives in a household with a UAC, or a household that potentially might sponsor a UAC.
how does a national emergency make mexico pay for it?
Blake Lee
Reading this again, it just says you can't use the funds in this bill for this purpose. Doesn't mean you can't use funds from somewhere else to do it. It doesn't enshrine anything into law, just how money is spent. National Emergency would pay for this section. What were the other parts people were arguing about?
Section 224(a) prohibits the deportation of anyone who is sponsoring an “unaccompanied” minor illegal alien – or who says they might sponsor a UAC, or lives in a household with a UAC, or a household that potentially might sponsor a UAC. It’s truly difficult to understate the betrayal behind this provision. One of the driving factors of the invasion is the misinterpretation of the UAC law. Under current law, Central American teenagers are only treated as refugees if they are A) a victim of “A severe form of trafficking” and B) have no relatives in the country. Yet almost all of them are self-trafficked by these very illegal relatives who are indeed present in the country. Rather than clamping down on this fleecing of the American people, the bill gives amnesty to the very people paying the cartels to invade us!
“We can call this the MS-13 Household Protection Act of 2019,” said Jessica Vaughan of the Center for Immigration Studies. “We know that 80 percent of the UAC sponsors are in the country illegally. The number of people this would protect would reach into the hundreds of thousands, if all of the household or potential household members are counted. ICE has estimated that 30-40 percent of the MS-13 members it has arrested in the last two years arrived as UACs. There is no reason to shield any of these individuals from deportation. After all, if the minor is living with family, they should no longer be considered unaccompanied anyway. If there are illegal aliens here who do not yet have a child here to serve as a deportation shield, this certainly is an incentive for them to make the arrangements to bring one.”
Amnesty Don doing the dems work for them because his ego is so fragile, he will not veto this bill or not sign it because the last shutdown was blamed on him and he's a little bitch who can't stand not being liked.
Jonathan Nelson
>believing anything the wh says
John Kelly
That bill only controls funds appropriated in that bill. It can't reach outside that.
James Davis
He could just not sign this bill and use his fucking executive authority without even declaring an emergency.
David Moore
The US should nuke the entire world and afterwards kill all non-whites in their country.
yes it does you fucking retard. ITS AMNESTY, and on top of that it fucking undermines the entire wall concept by reducing the amount of land trump can build on exceptionally.
Angel Morris
>Just hope the House Dems give him money? That’s how our government works, yes. We have three branches of governance. The Executive cannot demand any money it wants.
Do you want to live in a world where a Democrat can declare a national emergency because of global warming and start demanding the energy sector shut down, or declare that guns are such an issue we need to take them all away without asking Congress for permission?
Checks and balances are good.
Aaron Price
LMFAO AT THE SHILLS AT THIS VERY MOMENT PROCLAIMING IT'S OVER
AGAIN LOL
Ian Smith
Really, though. Trannies need to calm the fuck down.
>That bill only controls funds appropriated in that bill. It can't reach outside that. except it doesn't. Why are you lying? /ptg/ was denouncing the other sections of the bill not even two threads ago. It has other shit in it.
Chase Smith
>this act or any other act
Luis Campbell
Depends on what "accounts in the Treasury of the United States derived by the collection of fees" means. To me it seems to mean Treasury funds of any type.
Alexander Butler
I said that like 10 years ago desu
Eli Baker
>The party of small government now building a wall without congress approved money and using so much eminent domain
Luke Carter
>guns A right guaranteed by the second amendment. That'd be like taking the right to vote away with a national emergency. >healthcare Show where healthcare is guaranteed by law. The wall is part of the Secure Fence Act. >climate change Again, where is this guaranteed by law. How does the military even play a role here?