How Many of You Truly Believe That Being White, Straight, Male, etc., Makes You Superior?

I'm trying to figure out if this is a joke or if you have actually deluded yourself into thinking that you're special.

Attached: 1550641555361.gif (500x290, 491K)

How many of you kikes actually think you are God's chosen people?

Attached: 2983752354.png (1420x904, 1.67M)

I'm an atheist, not a Jew, but serious question: Do you think that not being Jewish makes you a special snowflake?

Well gosh, I wouldn't say superior but I do feel like I've had it pretty good because I'm white

Superior by what standard?

If it's not what makes me superior, what accounts for my superiority? My heterosexuality obviously makes me more reproductively fit than a homosexual, so that one's a given, but what about all the other outcomes in which I am superior?

Its a race, not a religion you shifty kike.

Do you believe that having it good is due to innate superiority?

Do you think that you're better than people who don't fit into your demographic? Superior is a very simple word, people.

Even though heterosexuality makes you reproductively successful by nature, a homosexual person can engage in opposite-sex relationships and give birth. Furthermore, this doesn't mean that you're innately more important or useful. We're overpopulated. By superior, what I truly mean is, "Do you feel yourself to be better or more important?

I'm white.

Seriously though, do you feel yourself to be superior because you're not a Jew?

Go fag off with your straw man somewhere else.

Checked.

>Superior is a very simple word, people.
My problem isn't the word. It's the standard.

"Big", "small", "heavy", "better", "inferior", and "superior" are all words that are comparison operators. Thus, you need...
1) A standard on which the comparison is conducted.
2) A thing to compare against.

You've given me neither. "Are white people superior?" Is like asking "Does Texas have a lot?" or "Am I taller?"

>innate superiority
Don't know how to answer this. Superiority is subjective

The Aryan man is the only race fit to conquer the stars.
Nips are honorary and join us, their gene seed being forever passed on with their own Primarch.
GET.
OUT.

Attached: 82a.jpg (680x706, 39K)

>if you don't apologize for being born a straight white male and simply existing it means you think you're superior to everyone
leftist insecurity has no bounds

I am nothing before the Lord.

Post your hand with a timestamp if you're white.
No, I'm an honest man because I am not a jew.

This.

Is tungsten better than titanium?

We've been over this, Moishe.
>We just want your ungodly influence reduced.

Attached: 7C7DD0F6-71A7-450D-8052-62D263D30A5E.gif (480x267, 419K)

I live in a bad neighborhood of Chicago, I have yet to meet a single person of color who has any inate curiousity or drive to act out of altruism.

Shut the fuck up you spineless gypsy, take your jew cult preaching elsewhere.

But, am I wrong though?

Are white people superior to non-white people?

Do you feel that you are superior by birth though?

So, it is a joke?

Point out where I said that.

All right then.

Why the fuck do you concern yourself about this?
Mind your own business and go back to Africa!

I don’t need to believe I am superior to want to preserve a future for white children

I don't think we're superior. I just want to live with my own people and be respected for that.

This alone is to much to ask.

Don't make demands and expect them to be fulfilled. Clearly, being white hasn't stopped you from being a child.

I'm asking for your personal take.

So, you believe yourself to be superior.

So, you believe that you're superior.

Attached: 851DFE13-7275-495E-92E9-211C671943D4.jpg (534x401, 58K)

I'm curious.

So, you think that you're superior to non-white people.

You want segregation?

>Are white people superior to non-white people?
By? What? Standard?

At least you gave two operands to "superior". But you still haven't provided a criterion.

Is tungsten better than titanium?
Are strawberries superior to raspberries?

>joke
No, its the O9A, nigger.
Post your hand.

>Are strawberries superior to raspberries?
yes

I'm much better than any brown person I've ever met and I went to one of the most elite universities in the United States.

Brown people suck and need to stop thinking they get to have a say in the direction of the United States.

Unironical question: how does race equality fit into the framework of someone who believes in evolution?

Hijacking these posts to observe that the framing of incorporating any of these things into your identity as "x supremacy" is deliberate misdirection in order to make you more easy to dismiss. It's much harder to argue that whites deserve to be subjected to ethnocide than it is to just say "he thinks he's better than everyone else for being white, how arrogant / compensating / etc."

Are white people superior to non-white people by your own personal standard of what constitutes superiority?

Cry harder.

How did you arrive at that conclusion? It's not what I said, and it is not even implied. So how did you arrive at that conclusion?
> I think you're projecting
> the bullshit inference has lessened my interest, so do try to entertain.

;0)

Attached: 0561F536-CFC7-4BF4-9B7B-C13B95A63A66.jpg (960x826, 84K)

What?

Haha. You're so cute.

We are all homo sapiens, given that we have complex speech, bipedalism, and self-awareness.

Hm. I don't agree with genocide, but you're definitely arrogant.

You want the "ungodly influence" of Jews reduced. So, you believe your influence to be better.

>implying
Keep shilling on pol kike, you will end yourself soon enough.

Yep
> its not like OP is honest, or even insightful. He thinks his smarmy detachment amounts to a kind of intellectual superiority. He's a living Vox article.

Attached: BDEC85A0-1F3F-4C2E-AB81-299E976A0E39.png (500x392, 137K)

Glad I've been saging your shit bait.
Fuck off back to /MLP/ faggot.

>Are white people superior to non-white people by your own personal standard of what constitutes superiority?

>>Are strawberries superior to raspberries?
>yes

Well.... maybe if your standard is weight or size. But not if your criteria is antioxidant concentration.

And there is no accounting for taste. So as long as you don't care what my criteria for "superior" is, you are just wasting a slot for a thread on the board for the sake of inviting division.

Show your flag.

>yfw you're sad that someone won't stoop to your level

I'm sorry that I'm not going to post meaningless hand pictures on Jow Forums, just because some child cried for it. You are the establishment that you hate.

No.

The White Dick, is the most powerful force for good on the entire planet.

The Straight White Male must set it free to save us all.

So, it /is/ a joke. That's (2) people saying that it's a joke, (1) and debatably (2) people genuinely believing that they're superior, and a lot of people arguing over semantics.

>No.

No, _what_? You seem like you have a childish grasp of language. You have to be 18+ to be here.

Show your flag, or I continue to SAGE you.

>I'm white
>Prove it
>N-no
You must be new.

I've offered no value judgment of my ethnic group besides implying that I identify with / am fond of it. If that's sufficient to accuse me of arrogance then so is every black person, Japanese, Mexican, etc. who identifies with their ethnocultural group

Let's shake it up a bit. Everyone is focussing on whiteness. Do you feel that you're superior to women as men or superior to gay people as a straight person?

Funniest thing is that I never thought so, until I realized that shitskins literally and non ironically want us dead.
So I am supremacist in a sense I put interests of my race and nation above everything else

I'm 18+, but your question was, "Are white people superior to non-white people by your standard?" You reversed my question and I said that I didn't believe that. It's not my fault that you can't grasp cause-and-effect though.

As for whether I'm going to show my flag... No. You don't get to make demands, baby. This is the Internet.

No, I'm seasoned. I just don't listen to the demands of children.

No, I accused you of arrogance for thinking that people are actually committing "white genocide."

That's (3) people taking it seriously.

>Do you feel that you're superior to women as men or superior to gay people as a straight person?

For fuck's sake, man... you've learned nothing.
Males are objectively superior athletes. Heterosexuals raise more children that themselves produce children.

With no standard, you are inviting people to pour the prejudices and biases into an answer to a non-question.

SAGE

You're still failing to give criteria.
I am superior to homosexuals in the ability to NOT have an STD or colon cancer, and NOT abuse children.

Did I use that term?

>fellow white people

show flag, kike

Does athleticism make men superior universally? What about non-athletic pursuits? What about women who are better athletes than the average man?
As for homosexuals, not all heterosexuals raise heterosexual children or even children who reproduce. It's not an inherited trait. Furthermore, as I have mentioned, we are overpopulated. Reproducing doesn't matter anymore.

I am inviting people to pour their prejudices and biases in because, if you have prejudices, you're prejudiced and you think of yourself as superior.

My cultural upbringing of whites were that they were rich folks who could afford not needing to work out on the sun.
Aesthethically, whites are often the most diverse, colorful and programming-wise beautiful people.

Homosexual parents tend to be better at raising children than heterosexual parents. I can provide citations if you want.

Hmm. Nope.

Are you attempting to rationalize nazbol to yourself? Is that what this is about? Or do you just get off on pretending to be superior on an anonymous board?
Start by posting your body stats first if you're going to do this.

I'm not the one going around claiming I'm privileged but that's being labeled to me.

Do you think that black people all look the same?

ironically, your sin is arrogance. There was no delusion involved, we arrive where we arrive via real world experience and intense study of the world. You will too if you are intellectually honest.

What's a nazbol or a body stat?

Because you are.

So, you think that you're superior.

deliberately weakening and outbreeding is genocide. only slow. try to deny this.

also every race is superior in the place they belong to. eg. africans are the superior race in africa, europeans in europe etc. how is this so hard to understand?

could it be because you have no homeland?

superiority doesn't matter, whites have a right to their countries. that's the only thing that matters. take your stupid talking points where you paint people as supremacists for wanting to ensure their people survive. fuck you, faggot.

>"Are white people superior to non-white people by your standard?"
I never asked you that. You asked me, and I asked you by what standard?

>cause-and-effect
None of this has anything to do with cause-and-effect. How the fuck can you even function in the world? If you aren't a troll, I think you are either a register jockey, or you exist on the sufferance of others.

Why hide your flag, shill?

SAGE

>nb4 infographs aren't proof
I'll muster up a link to all of these if you'd like.
You must be a fag or have nothing better to do.

Attached: 1545748821651.jpg (647x685, 42K)

It's not about being superior, it's about being different. The races are different, and there's nothing wrong with wanting to be around your own people.

Attached: 325253453554.jpg (1200x801, 206K)

Were not overpopulated until enough of us are unable to meet our basic resource needs. What we need now higher birth rates and increased immigration, but only immigration from western Europeans.

Well, I don't care about biological differences desu, they are not as important as many people think
If you are being chased down by a tiger, would you care about number of his stripes?

reading through some posts its either a pretty alright troll, saying all the things that are commonly mocked and debunked (WE are overpopulating the planet, stop breeding), or legitimately mentally ill/brainwashed

Genocide is mass murder. About the superiority thing, I wouldn't be so sure if I were you. Apartheid existed in Africa until recently. In regards to the homeland thing, you're grasping for straws. So, you think that you're superior.

So, you think that you're superior.

I'm hiding my flag to piss you off because you're shitting your diaper on the Internet over someone not revealing their homeland.

Muster up the links, bitch boy.

>its only skin deep
Fuck off, Henry the Cuck.

But, do you think that your people are better?

Enough of you are unable to meet your needs. Do I need to bring up evidence of poverty rates?

So, this is one person who is stating that they're not superior?

For reference:
>Article 7 of a 1994 draft of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples uses both the word "ethnocide" and the phrase "cultural genocide" but does not define what they mean. The complete article reads as follows:

>Indigenous peoples have the collective and individual right not to be subjected to ethnocide and cultural genocide, including prevention of and redress for:
>(a) Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic identities;
>(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources;
>(c) Any form of population transfer which has the aim or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;
>(d) Any form of assimilation or integration by other cultures or ways of life imposed on them by legislative, administrative or other measures;
>(e) Any form of propaganda directed against them.

You won't care about number of his brain cells too
It can be a good excuse to tell Kikes to GTFO, but not more

I'm leaving in 5 mins anyway. Just letting you cool babies know.

>Does athleticism make men superior universally?
Of course not. When talking about collections of things, generalization to an individual is a logic flaw. And I'm guessing that in your case, it takes the form of being a racist.
Any healthy woman is a better athlete than Steven Hawking was. But this is a red herring. It doesn't change the aggregate.

>What about non-athletic pursuits?
Different standard, dummy.


>It's not an inherited trait.

>as I have mentioned, we are overpopulated.
Well, there's your values that dictate your standard. By your criterion, it is plausible that you believe homosexuals are superior. If so, your arguments will self-destruct. But at least I got something close to a declaration of standard out of you.

>Reproducing doesn't matter anymore.
kek... I'm glad you aren't raising kids. Mine won't have to deal with yours in the future.

>if you have prejudices
All humans have prejudices. Period.

>you think of yourself as superior.
Superior to you. But you had to open your dumb ass mouth for me to believe it.

SAGE

I believe we are superior culturally though, that's why nigs aren't welcome here, same as all non-europeans

As a non-white, I can tell the subtle ugliness of orcs.

i do think I am superior to you as an individual (not because of any group identity), because you're shifty, dodgy and dishonest.
prime example is arguing the genocide thing. you know, that outbreeding and deliberate stifling is a form of eradication, yet you dance around semantics to "win" the argument.
These tactics are notorious

not much so superior, but certainly more suited to a particular environment then people of other races. to use the term "nice guy national socialism" coined by MM, I don't hate any other group of people (and I don't even HATE jews, I pity them for being such scummy people, but not hate) and I just want whites and european culture to survive and have a place on this earth so we can conquer the stars.

That was a good rebuttal

Okay. By which standards do you think that women are better than men then?
Tell me how my arguments self-destruct.
Your children will interact with me, whether I have children or not, which makes this irrelevant. People aren't stuck in generational categories. Besides, even if reproduction doesn't matter, that doesn't mean that I or a homosexual person won't reproduce.

As for the topic of prejudices, I'm trying to figure out if people think that they're better than others due to their skin tone, genitals, preference for penis or vagina, etc.

In regards to the comment of you being "superior to me"... you're not, sonny. You're just shitting into your diaper on the Internet.

all of us

Attached: 1544967398258.jpg (500x512, 79K)

We dont think it makes us superior but there are differences between men and women both emotionally and biologically speaking so please you're not gonna deny that are you? What kind of thread is this? SAGE

So, you think that you're superior.

There are black people who look like dark-skinned Europeans.

I am shifty, dodgy, and dishonest. I pride myself on it. Have a nice day.

>implying that you'll conquer the stars

That's (3) for joking.

Detail the differences.

Oh, whoops. My time is up. I have to go start writing an essay on climate change. Have fun sniffing your own farts on the Internet.

It's not that I believe it makes me superior, it's that nature dictates that it makes me superior. If you're honestly arguing that niggers are human, please an hero.

Wait, m8, specify please
Are you asking if we are better as RACE or SOCIETY?
Race- no
Society-yes

superior in what regard? superior to who?
and on the "dark skinned european" thing there's no way that they have physical features similar to europeans without some amount of european ancestry or some form of cosmetic work to make it so.

I don't. I'm just sick of being around people who do not share my culture, values or physical appearance. Do you know how many Indians I speak to on a daily basis and how confusing the conversations are simply because they think differently. This country doesn't work. Even among the whites. Oh well.

drop the meme flag, discord tranny

me conquer the stars? no. but europeans and western civilization? yes. remember the real pioneers of the space race were scientists from the reich

>By which standards do you think that women are better than men then?
The reason for female voices being exclusively used in the old phone network in because their higher vocal registers made them more intelligible. I can go into technical detail if you like. Woman are objectively better for this purpose.

I had to enlist a woman's help to reproduce. They are better at giving birth.

Having lower aggregate body masses, and thus, less blood, they sustain higher accelerations than men.

I could go on, but you get the point (I think).

>Tell me how my arguments self-destruct.
I can't until you make one.

>"superior to me"
If this thread were a physical altercation, you'd be falling down drunk threatening the cops in between vomiting spells. If this conversation isn't trolling, my brain is far-better organized than yours.

>shitting into your diaper
My rhetoric is better, too.

SAGE