I have a question

Mankind has survived numerous climate changes through history, including the ice age. So why is it now that climate change will lead to the destruction of the earth? We're more technologically advanced than ever, shouldn't we be able to adapt to a changing climate?

If you're one of those dumbfounded dipshits who expects a static climate, try opening a science textbook and do some research.

And when you hear a politician say "the science is settled" remember that science is what we believe until new evidence comes along.

I think that trying to somehow stop a natural earth cycle is more frightening than climate change itself.

Attached: 59917348_l_large.jpg (800x535, 99K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/HRcZ86ukylU
twitter.com/AnonBabble

propoganda

Because the powers that be know that this one is different, THEE final boss if you will. They know that it is coming and there is nothing they can do to stop it. So what better thing to do than to make as much money out of it along the way and there favorite action. They Lie. Jesus is coming back, it is going to sure seem like the end of the world but it isn't but there will not be many that survive. Repent and accept Christ and escape the Tribulation.

youtu.be/HRcZ86ukylU

Attached: Crispy.jpg (751x420, 225K)

The problem is that the AGW hypothesis is not falsifiable, and thus not really science at all, because it continuously “morphs” into something it wasn’t before in order to accommodate the latest trends in that awkward thing called “reality.”

How many "climate scientists" correctly predicted the most recent weather event to be blamed on Climate Change?

The whole thing is a fucking scam to jack up electricity prices and charge more for steak.

Or to look at it another way, it already HAS been falsified, repeatedly – no troposphere “hot spot” as predicted by the climate models; endless “tipping points” which have come and gone without anything changing; the ever growing list of failed predictions including highways that were supposed to be under water nearly a decade ago, the end of winter snow, and disappearing Arctic sea ice; lack of any acceleration of sea level rise; Pacific islands that were supposed to be swallowed up by rising seas that are instead GROWING; no increase in extreme weather, no increase in hurricanes or tornadoes, falling climate-related deaths; the continued widening of the gap between climate models and observations, DESPITE all the "adjustments” to the so-called “data”; the fact that the climate models run in pretty good agreement with “reality” ONLY when you TURN OFF any sensitivity to CO2 which is programmed in.

Global problems need of global governance.
Take this as you will.

One day perhaps we can collect all the stories of wasted effort, wasted money, false prophecies and scientific misconduct that are wrapped up in the Global Warming religion. It would make a lesson of unparalleled scale with which to warn future generations about the ramblings of the end-of-times street hawkers who want you scared, want your money, and want to control every aspect of your life.

It does seem however that the misconduct will go on for a long time no matter how many falsified predictions, wasted resources, lost development opportunties and squandered human potential. Most likely, the curtain won’t be pulled back on the collective wizards of doom till long after they have escaped any repercussions other than historical excoriation.

We were warned in the heavens with a sign and if you eyes work simply observe the crazy weather, rapid decay of morals, and the evil that is abundant. It is all foretold in the Bible. That's what makes the Bible unlike any other book in existence. It declares the ending from the beginning. It is prophecy.

Attached: ENDTIMESv_1.jpg (1437x2949, 1.33M)

In a just world, the perpetrators would be tried for crimes against humanity for the millions of excess winter deaths caused by fuel poverty - a direct result of "green" taxes, tariffs and subsidies - and lack of healthcare that could have been easily provided by cheap, reliable and available fossil fuel energy.

If you think you detect a whiff of desperation from these frauds you would be right - deep down they know it's only time until the jig is up; their only chance at avoiding retribution is to politicise the sham, and ensnare as many co-conspirators as possible to share and dilute the guilt and shame.

In the end the credulous believers will claim that they were simply mistaken, taken in, swept up by a tide of human emotion; they were misled, persuaded by others who seemed so confident and sincere; that really all they were guilty of was trusting too much, caring too much, loving too much. That they just wanted to protect the fragile biosphere, and all those defenceless children and innocent creatures, both alive and yet to be born.

And who could possibly find them at fault for such a noble, blameless human failing?

>We're more technologically advanced than ever
exactly, there's more complicated stuff that we rely on now which could be subject to a cascading series of failures
>And when you hear a politician say "the science is settled" remember that science is what we believe until new evidence comes along
well yeah, but our best available evidence says that its happening. also, dont imply that new evidence will automatically be counter to what scientists think
>natural earth cycle
so human co-opting of the entire land surface is natural huh

Certain mitigating factors, which technology can ultimately solve though are still problematic to turn around.

>US breadbasket has lost half its top soil to the ocean since settlement
>the US’s reliance on GM seeds and herbicides leading to bio-diversity decline and the possibility of weed strains that are resistant (no new herbicides have been developed in decades).
>hydroponic / aquaponics etc are energy insensitive and haven’t been made highly profitable when scaled up (without high carbon dioxide addition) to replace traditional soil farming
>although plentiful now potash / potassium mines are a finite resource. Fertiliser production would have switch back to animal dung at some point


At some point the earth cannot support the current level of human population as it now stands, whichever way you believe the climate will go.

The earth will survive. It's the hight of human arrogance to assume we would be able to destroy it.
No doubt that we have had an effect on climate change but we have only accelerated what was already happening. We are a resilient species too. We will survive.

>It's the hight of human arrogance to assume we would be able to destroy it.
cool, i didn't imply we could
>we have only accelerated what was already happening
right, that's the entire fucking problem

Attached: 4573674.png (226x251, 76K)

>So why is it now that climate change will lead to the destruction of the earth?

The Earth will be fine It's humans who are fucked

>We're more technologically advanced than ever, shouldn't we be able to adapt to a changing climate?

We're more technologically advanced, but our whole civilisation is built on things working a certain way.

Yeah, sure, the climate has been changing for thousands of years. The sea levels now are roughly 60 metres higher nowadays than they were 10,000 years ago. How many cities and people lived in the area currently under water? Zero and probably a few thousand.

If the seas rise a few metres (It will), it will result in the destruction of thousands of cities the displacement of literally billions of people.

If climate changes causes the extinction of certain species (it will) it completely changes the ecosystem.

If climate changes causes areas we currently farm to become nonviable (ti will), it completely destroys our food source.

The climate HAS changed before. But It's been pretty fucking stable for the last 5000 years with a few hundred year cold blips (which were devastating FYI) and that's allowed everything we understand to be human - civilisation - to exist. Drastic climate change in the modern world will result in a completely different world to what we understand.

A few million Middle easteners start trying to enter Europe and It's a several year media and political affair. What's the world gonna be like when 100 million Africans try to get to Europe because their soil is degraded and their rivers are dry? What's America gonna be like when It's crops and cities get hammered by increasingly worse droughts, cyclones & blizzards?

Yeah i lean this way now, ever since the 50’s when people were seeing red auroras over New York and a panicky US administration began throwing money at studying the sun have we learned just how rare it was to be bombarded by so much sunspot activity. The high output of sunspots is coming to an end now and if it gets colder in the coming decades I can’t wait to see what the counter narratives.

Modern society is way more vulnerable than scattered tribes or more sparsely populated kingdoms or whatever of the past.
It's like with solar CMEs. Previous really big one just made telegraph lines fuck up and start some fires, a similar event today would be cataclysmic with all the electronics a huge portion of us rely on in day to day life.

Would we survive that or rising temperatures and sea levels? Of course. But in a more globalized world relying way more on sensitive technologies and systems it'd be pretty nasty. Like imagine the chaos if electronics were nuked for even a year with all the people relying so much on them for example.

>Would we survive that or rising temperatures and sea levels?

Google ‘Global Warming pause’ or ‘global warming haitus’. Educate yourself, even the IPCC admit we aren’t warming anymore.

Attached: 60325F8A-7E39-40FE-8CCA-384D9C9121FF.jpg (1280x720, 129K)

Attached: ObamaSeaLevel.jpg (800x800, 249K)

Attached: GlobalHurricanes.png (720x540, 234K)

Attached: GlobalTornadoes.png (720x540, 177K)

Attached: ArcticSeaIce.png (798x417, 38K)

>Humans survived ice age.
Were no humans around then retard.

Attached: ClimateDeaths.png (758x717, 79K)

Attached: GreenlandIceCoreInterglacial.png (829x493, 156K)

Attached: TemperatureAdjustments.png (575x463, 40K)

There were humans during the last glaciation period. Try reading a book, dumbass.

Checked
What is always being debated though is human involvement with climate change. We don't contribute nearly enough to cause the drastic changes these conmen claim. Climate change is real, but it's as real as four season in a year. It's a normal cycle the earth goes through.
>CO2 levels rise
>Plant growth rises due to carbon dioxide rich climate
>CO2 levels eventually fall back down
>Plant growth decreases

no no no no no no --- Not the destruction of Earth -- The Destruction of the SQ...

Global warming is happening. It is slight, beneficial, and mostly in uninhabited regions of the northern hemisphere in winter at night.

However life really dodged a bullet with CO2 - at the end of the last glaciation it was down at 200ppm. Much below 180ppm all plants die, and with them, all mammals and other multicellular species.

The current level of 400ppm is barely above the lower limit for life. Plants evolved at 1000ppm, the level farmers inject into their greenhouses to promote growth.

The earth has greened more than 15% in the last 30 years as a result of the additional CO2, of which humans have been a minor contributor.

So we should burn those fossil fuels for all we're worth. We may put off the next ice age for a extra century or two.