What does Jow Forums think about atheists?

>Comunism
>Not a religion
As an atheist i would say to you that Communism is a religion that wants to establish heaven in hearth following the same concepts that other religions do, like:
>Sharing is caring
>We have to distribute our wealth
>Jews are bad
>We always right

Attached: npc-meme38.jpg (416x435, 46K)

no but all commies are atheists

still no skill

This is what these Rule 34 artists who are Degenerate Atheists post.

Attached: Gumball Rule 34 (censored).png (1851x1041, 944K)

To make a totally unironic post -

Spirituality and religion is one of the later stages of the "redpill" process. Realizing and understanding facts come first as they are the most obvious, but a lot of traditional literature and customs stem from a spiritual connection.

Over time if you start to physically apply the redpills you take in (such as lifting weights, learning martial arts, auditing your own thought process to be a more controlled stoic man, etc.) then you will start to feel something. These kinds of things require looking and aspiring towards an ideal of some sort, and religion itself is ideal worship. Once you start to both feel and embrace this type of feeling, you will be more open to what the mysticism of faith is and how it plays a role in your life.

Humans are religious creatures and atheism reduces us down to economic units with no purpose beyond the end of our lives. A common religion is as important as race, but bear in mind, a lot of religion has been dumbed down.

>conflating religion with values
burger education at best

Explain me how the biggest dark hole in our human history had nothing to do with religion:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Ages

>Stalin is associated with athiesm
t. subversive athiest

Hard to blame atheists for not joining bogus cults, but in their fervor to reject the koolaid they miss out on a lot

>Most Scientists Don't believe in God.
Can someone post the link or the picture of that study that says this is untrue? It's like 51% of scientists believe in a god, or something.

Fiction is authored. Mythology is not. The important distinction is that mythology is an emergent phenomenon collectively generated by socities over time.

Religion is also distinct from mythology. Religions can be “tampered with,” as you put it. They can be and are used as a vector for propaganda and behavioral programming — perhaps necessarily, but they are vulnerable to corruption. Even in compromised religions, the collectively generated nature of the root mythology makes it much more difficult to subvert.

Gumball stuff specifically? Or furry stuff?

>The real redpill is that all mythologies are collectively generated symbolic languages that describe fundamental recurring patterns in the cosmos.

Attached: 1539817339834.jpg (600x750, 27K)

Gumball Stuff Specifically

>Was moot an atheist?

Of course

Attached: 1546103162297.jpg (629x1280, 91K)

Aw, someone’s insecure.

Mathematically, the stupidity value of atheism is exactly the sum of the stupidity value of all other potential religions, factorial.

1. Saying that God definitely exists is asserting something that is by definition unprovable. That's the whole point of God. It's not provable either way.

2. Saying that God definitely DOESN'T exist is asserting an infinity of things that are all by definition unprovable.

3. The stupidity value of atheism is literally ∞!

>what do atheists think about atheists?
ftfy, larper faggot

Authored fiction becomes mythology after centuries in which both the origins and context of the original are forgotten.

Show me one of those recurring patterns, then.
Are you talking about some obvious shit like "don't kill people for no reason"?

Without origin and context of origin, there is no author. Mythology is collective; authorship is individual.

>2. Saying that God definitely DOESN'T exist is asserting an infinity of things that are all by definition unprovable.
No. it is asserting exactly one thing does not exist. The definition of God includes omnipotence, which means there can only be one. You cannot have 2 omnipotent beings.

So that would mean 1 and 2 are equally stupid, but that is not entirely correct either because assertion 2 would never have been made without someone first making assertion 1.

And since we know making assertion 1 is incredible stupid, making an assertion 2 that rejects that stupidity is slightly less stupid.
Admittedly, only slightly, but still.

Of course there is an author. You just don't know who it was and what the reason for making up the story was. That does not mean they do not exist.

>Most people Don't believe in God due to learning Astronomy, Biology, Physics, Geology, and Mathematics. Most Scientists Don't believe in God.
Are there really people out there who are so fucking stupid that they believe that is the reason why people don't believe in god?

>if a tree falls in a forest
wow were you the 3rd grade valedictorian?

The definition of God is that you can't prove it exists. Asserting that a God exists means you're trying to prove one thing that can't be proven. Asserting that no Gods exist means you're trying to prove that an infinite number of Gods don't exist in any combination. If you set the stupidity value of asserting a God exists to 1, then the stupidity value of asserting no Gods exist is ∞!. This is basic probability, you can't talk your way around it.

>hurr durr teach me
Nah. Wasted on that double digit IQ.

False. I’ve told you why twice now.

The thing I hate about atheists is that they wear their beliefs like these faggots wear they're faggotry.

Attached: GPSC3by.jpg (500x339, 65K)

Yeah but that statistic includes cake major sciences, not just hard sciences.

I don’t think most religious people mean the same thing when they say “God”. Even among those who go to the same church/mosque/whatever seem to believe very different and contradictory things about God’s character. My question is: If there is one true omnipotent God, then why wouldn’t he make sure that every man, woman, and child on Earth knew his character? It seems like “God” is just a reflection of the believer’s character; and it is understandable why each person’s version of God has similar intentions to their own.
You could probably define a God into existence, but it is a wasteful effort if other people disagree with your definition- and most people will. I don’t believe in a God, because I have yet to hear a coherent and agreed upon definition of what exactly that is. I believe that “something” existed before our universe came into existence, but I don’t see any legitimate reason to personify that “something” with human-like traits.

(And if your God is Yahweh from Abrahamic faith, you probably have a clear definition for him. Unfortunately, he was invented by goat herding, yeast hating, child rapists who knew nothing factual about our universe and decided to rip off their explanation for everything from older myths).

Attached: 5482E1D2-0BBF-41E3-9D1C-CE151928E42E.jpg (495x271, 55K)

>refusing to redpill your fellow board dwellers
shame on you fedora

>“Why doesn’t God behave the way that I, a bald naked monkey, expect him to?”

I do hope you realize this isn’t a very compelling argument against the existence of God.

I gave you the tools to redpill yourself. The rest is up to you. Consider it a call to adventure.

Locke was right in that atheists should not be allowed in a Democracy.

Now I know where Ayelet Shaked and the Founding Fathers were coming from.

Athiests caused:
National Socialism in Germany
Communism in Eastern Europe and East Asia
General Socialism in Western Europe

They're fucking shite. And they're all socialists, which doesn't make any sense because they should be /more/ pragmatic. I'm an atheist, but god damn are atheists fucking ridiculous.

Sounds like you're just bluffing to me. But good on you if you know something I don't.

I think I'm pretty logical, and smart and handsome and funny and totally relatable and did I say logical? Yep being an atheist makes me pretty great

>there are two types of atheists those believe that god doesn't exist (Retards) you cannot say that god doesn't exist without acknowledge the existence of god, god only exist for as long as you believe in god, saying god doesn't exists means you believe in not believing in something that doesn't exists which is a waste of brain cells and memory
You cannot say unicorns don't exist without acknowledge the existence of unicorns. Unicorns only exist for as long as you believe in unicorns, saying unicorns don't exist means you believe in not believing in something that doesn't exist which is a waste of brain cells and memory.

What is God?
If you believe that God exists, then why?

Atheism is just Communism but with food.

Attached: 1561615156156161561.gif (400x268, 1.03M)