Give me one reason why We The People shouldn't be allowed to possess the FIM-92...

Jack White
Jack White

Give me one reason why We The People shouldn't be allowed to possess the FIM-92 Stinger?

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Attached: Portuguese-Army-CBRN-Air-Defence,-Trident-Juncture-15-(22560845832).jpg (266 KB, 1280x853)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puckle_gun
jowforums.com/thread/206249589/politics

Tyler Jenkins
Tyler Jenkins

Attached: stonetoss-2nd.jpg (124 KB, 625x605)

Henry Ramirez
Henry Ramirez

Attached: 155283635728362581.png (281 KB, 960x960)

James Wilson
James Wilson

Also reminder Founding Fathers would absolutely have known about the potential for rapid fire guns.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puckle_gun

Colton Jenkins
Colton Jenkins

There needs to be a line somewhere. Would you fly commercial if these were among the general public? How about legalize full auto and anything up 20mm

Attached: M61Vulcan.jpg (2.38 MB, 2000x1328)

Samuel Rodriguez
Samuel Rodriguez

No reason user. Enjoy.

Liam Robinson
Liam Robinson

I can't.

Benjamin Baker
Benjamin Baker

If you'd use the guns you have now you could own anything you'd want.

Gabriel Anderson
Gabriel Anderson

I would only fly if the plane im on has equal or greater firepower

Attached: gxmRulosfFXD4cqM0RYy-luMmXeczsv19NJieE-jOEQ.jpg (4 KB, 96x96)

Carson Cooper
Carson Cooper

Because then you can't play with the plane. Shoot the crew and then you can remove stumps with your brand new sidewinder.

Levi Rivera
Levi Rivera

Indeed.
I don't even fly commercially now, I don't trust letting someone drive or fly for me.

Jace Diaz
Jace Diaz

yeah gimme that shit

Attached: whatashame.png (206 KB, 294x341)

Parker Ross
Parker Ross

It shall be infringed. Its just a matter of time really.

Jace Williams
Jace Williams

Give me one reason why We The People shouldn't be allowed to possess the FIM-92 Stinger?

Because those in power fear you and know that depriving you is the only way they remain in power.

Ryder Hernandez
Ryder Hernandez

The founding father's would have been teenagers or younger when that gun was developed. As there were only two prototypes constructed at the time, and were more importantly developed in England, not America. So the chances of knowledge of the weapon reaching the founding father's is extremely unlikely to none. The Puckle gun also wasn't a 'machine gun' by any modern definition.

Liam Sanders
Liam Sanders

how dare you infringe on my right to own a 30mm gun

Attached: GAU-8.jpg (178 KB, 1800x1150)

Robert Carter
Robert Carter

Puckle gun, giardoni air rifle, lorenzoni

Dylan Davis
Dylan Davis

Because some nog will end up stealing one and shooting down a plane just because they are so impulsive and have no foresight

Evan Russell
Evan Russell

Its not a big deal pretty fucking good against car theft

Leo Bailey
Leo Bailey

Unironically I believe individuals should be allowed to own nukes. No similar limitation exist on civilization-affecting techniques and technology regarding freedom of speech except in wartime.

Attached: pepebang.gif (349 KB, 300x169)

Nolan Robinson
Nolan Robinson

why don't we just ban nogs

Jose Martin
Jose Martin

Give me one reason why We The People shouldn't be allowed to possess the FIM-92 Stinger?
Because you decided to classify niggers as "We the People"

Carter Adams
Carter Adams

The boring truth is t least in the USA the Supreme Court ruled decades ago it had to have reasonable home/personal defensive use to be protected. That’s the basic legal definition of “arms”

Camden Hughes
Camden Hughes

If the government can have it, so can I. Anything less is tyranny.

Connor Lee
Connor Lee

Agreed

Ryan Collins
Ryan Collins

implying

Attached: 1547596137035.jpg (283 KB, 1054x774)

Lincoln Stewart
Lincoln Stewart

flying commercial
imagine being a poorfag kek

Bentley Mitchell
Bentley Mitchell

Because those in power fear you
not as much as they should

Attached: guns.png (171 KB, 595x325)

Alexander Bell
Alexander Bell

I unironically support the possession of nuclear weapons for recreational purposes.

If you don't agree then you're a commiefag in need of extermination.

Attached: PWNWAR-NUKE.jpg (84 KB, 1477x1180)

Nicholas Martinez
Nicholas Martinez

reasonable home/personal defensive use to be protected
So like, a MANPADS when people are advocating drone strikes on gun-owners.

Grayson Gomez
Grayson Gomez

You jest but you're correct.

Why should governments be the only ones allowed to have weapons that can exterminate mass amounts of people? There is clearly malicious intent and action going on from every government against its people, and they could very well stage false flag attacks to eradicate undesirable populations or to cause geopolitical maneuvering that makes them and their donors richer.

Private nukes would be another thorn in the side of tyrany.

Michael Wilson
Michael Wilson

i dont see anything wrong with allowing this
i dont see the point in possessing this

Dominic White
Dominic White

You remember these things actually cost something, right? Not many of us have a spare $100K+ to purchase a system like this, and maybe another few thousand dollars for the ammunition

Im not necessarily even advocating either side here, but to insinuate that airtravel will suddenly be unsafe because of crackheads playing around with chainguns is, quite frankly, fucking retarded

William Moore
William Moore

Lorenzoni is probably the best example, considering there was active correspondence with him. Washington was curious about getting repeating muskets due to the numerical superiority of the brittish. In the end they never ordered any due to costs. The fact these letters exist utterly BTFO the "couldn't have foreseen" argument on the grounds that the Founding Fathers we're actively trying to equip their civilian militias with weapons specifically designed to kill a large number of people as fast as possible.

Ethan Richardson
Ethan Richardson

Nunchucks to nuclear weapons. If the government has it, you ought to as well. It's worth noting that the amount of labor and energy required to maintain a nuclear weapon would naturally prohibit singular ownership in almost every instance.

Blake Sullivan
Blake Sullivan

Rockets are artillery, not arms. You need a dictionary.

Lucas Myers
Lucas Myers

The founding fathers where terrorists.
Are you a fucking terrorist you channer?

Brayden Hall
Brayden Hall

A guided missile system is a rocket
You need to not be a smartass

Tyler Gutierrez
Tyler Gutierrez

it is undisputed that the original intent of the 2nd amendment extended to things like cannons

in other words, you're wrong

Eli Davis
Eli Davis

Because some people think that nogs are people too

Mason Nelson
Mason Nelson

People privately owned field guns, cannons, and warships.

Wyatt Richardson
Wyatt Richardson

its funny because a lot of you RETARDS are the same people who complained that
KILLSTREAKS ARE OVERPOWERED IN MW2!!!!!

meanwhile...the stinger was a ONE HIT KILL to any air streak and you got 3 missiles per life which was even enough to take out an ac130 (highest streak in the game).

and now you wanna own one IRL?

fuck you, pol.
you ruined killstreaks in every cod since. you dont get to own a stinger now.

Kayden Kelly
Kayden Kelly

Nevermind, I just figured it out the most elegant solution.
Nogs - legal
Guns - legal
Murder - ILLEGAL
ONE SIMPLE TRICK
MURDERERS HATE THIS

Cooper Martinez
Cooper Martinez

yes

Attached: 5-112849797.jpg (41 KB, 615x409)

Jacob Thomas
Jacob Thomas

I am new to Jow Forums
I was insinuating air travel would be unsafe with stinger missiles not 20mm cannons

Lincoln Morgan
Lincoln Morgan

Don't care what you own.
Do care where you shoot it and at what.

Matthew Rivera
Matthew Rivera

The opposite is true, actually. I assume you're talking about US vs Miller, which actually ruled that 2A does not apply to weapons without a use in militia or military service. That ended up being a cuck ruling no one was really happy with, as it was applied as narrowly as possible.

Sebastian Hill
Sebastian Hill

What makes you think you can't?
(laughs at your kvetching)

Noah Rogers
Noah Rogers

Retard
Let all the rich old kikes get nukes, great idea

James Barnes
James Barnes

Dont shift the goalpost, that is not at all what your original post implied.

Mason Perry
Mason Perry

Nukes should be privately owned and government should only be able to rent them from private citizens.

Brandon Reed
Brandon Reed

We can...Tanks too, and technically there is nothing that says nuke are a no no either. Anything the Govt can have, so can we.

Landon Hall
Landon Hall

Why are you blaming/pol/ over this?

Daniel Gonzalez
Daniel Gonzalez

sorry you didn't see it that way. Everyone else did.

Oliver Turner
Oliver Turner

I'll take the gep gun.

Thomas Peterson
Thomas Peterson

Yes but they have never had the 'right' to own artillery. And you can still own warships and fighter jets and tanks, without any special paperwork even.

Charles Russell
Charles Russell

The Israelis have had missile countermeasures on their commercial flights for decades for exactly that reason, seems to work fine.

Noah Parker
Noah Parker

I believe individuals should be allowed to own nukes.
I will be the first to admit I would nuke israel with my privately owned nuke.

Aiden Green
Aiden Green

NO reason not to. I seen some people in Alabama that had flame throwers. Why not??

Connor Young
Connor Young

let's allow these poorly guarded idiots that live on plantations stretching for literal square miles have weapons capable of eradicating those exact plantations for the cheap versions...

it's like you don't want an easy way to eradicate the rich old kikes.
who's side are you on?

Cooper Rogers
Cooper Rogers

They we're guaranteed the "right to bear arms". There was no quibbling that a warship was not an "arm". And yes, you can own one today with no special paperwork.. once the government knows everything about you and has also demilitarized the vehicle

Aiden Nelson
Aiden Nelson

We live in a nation founded on rebellion you faggot.

Gavin Garcia
Gavin Garcia

There isn’t one

Chase Garcia
Chase Garcia

Only reason I can give is that shitty people would steal them and sell them to Russians. Its the same reason why you can't own nukes: no matter how responsible you are, you can't stop smarter more sneaky people from stealing your weapons.

William Diaz
William Diaz

"Oh hey is this the line to nuke Israel? Cool? 1 hour wait time!?"

Matthew Sanders
Matthew Sanders

You are allowed.
You would need a tax stamp though.
The only thing stopping you is the technology involved.

Michael Thomas
Michael Thomas

Yup. Someone buy me a couple. Ty

Austin Long
Austin Long

see

Joshua Bailey
Joshua Bailey

you can if you can afford it

Caleb Roberts
Caleb Roberts

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Attached: 2d8189ca3bdc1b1004fa8962c92c99c0.jpg (109 KB, 1080x1080)

Jackson Young
Jackson Young

I completely unironically support this.

Carter Cox
Carter Cox

But Bernie said everything would be free. Surface to air missiles are a human right.

Juan Hall
Juan Hall

Let all the rich old kikes get nukes, great idea
There would also be some /k/ommando in the middle of some godforsaken desert that bought a silo and has a recreational nuke, hard-coded to nuke Israel at a moment's notice.

It balances out far more in our favor. Israel has to save face. /k/ommandos don't.

Luis Garcia
Luis Garcia

Hnnnggg

Oliver Howard
Oliver Howard

There is a line. The point of the 2nd amendment is the security of the state:

A well-regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State,

If a weapon puts the state at risk, it is to be banned from general use, nuclear and biological weapons being two threats off the top of my head.

Attached: boom.png (106 KB, 525x477)

Colton Brown
Colton Brown

implying they dont already
you do know why we call it zog RIGHT

Asher Diaz
Asher Diaz

knowledge of the weapon may have been nil, but ideas coming from europe was reality, not fiction

Julian Baker
Julian Baker

Based.

Xavier Cooper
Xavier Cooper

CALLING ALL BASED POSTERS WE ARE FREE

jowforums.com/thread/206249589/politics

jowforums.com/thread/206249589/politics

jowforums.com/thread/206249589/politics

jowforums.com/thread/206249589/politics

Justin Morgan
Justin Morgan

the risk is too great, at least when a retard with a ar-15 goes on a rampage, it doesn't have the potential to kill millions of people and damage the environment to a unacceptable degree

Brody Sullivan
Brody Sullivan

actually you can buy and own one. Its fucking stupid hard to get though.
here are the steps to do it legally.
find a company who is willing to sell it to you
apply to get 2 destructive device tax stamps
1 for the launcher
1 for the actual missile
get a background check from the FBI and ATF
wait 9-15 months
pick up your MANPAD
all this assuming you have the $50k for it, plus sales tax.

Thomas Smith
Thomas Smith

actually you can buy and own one
find a company who is willing to sell it to you
found the problem

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit