Andrew Yang is a fucking retard

Quote from Joe Rogan:
"You put 1000 dollars a month on their hand, it's going right back into the economy, they are going to expend it on food, child care, car repairs, nights out..."

Andrew Yang has a limited knowledge about economies, if you take 1000 dollars from someone and give this 1000 dollars to someones else, does that improve economy in any way? The money already exists, if the person getting the 1000 dollars expends this money, the economy stays the same!!
It's just like the broken window metaphor, if someone breaks a bakery's glass window with a rock, the window industry will thrive, because the owner of the Bakery will have to give money to the window shop, that's not true, the Bakery owner could have spared the money that he used to pay the window shop, invest it, or even expend it. Taking money from someone and giving it for someone else does not change the economy in any fucking way.

Attached: cropped-yang-resize.jpg (1080x505, 152K)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/7ooo1
cloverchronicle.com/2019/03/08/yanggang-exposed-insider-claims-2020-hopeful-andrew-yang-is-paying-groups-of-online-meme-operators-to-influence-voters/
twitter.com/N1TRO_DUBZ/status/1106028528578056192
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

The 1000 is being taken from Jews and Jew corporations

Attached: economyinfographicyang.png (2604x3804, 3.3M)

Do ctrl-f and search for "Jow Forums", they advertise the threads they make to eachother so they can comment and make it look like Yang has a lot of supporters.

Archive can be found here:
anonfile.com/gchfM0waba/YangDiscordArchives_7z

archive.is/7ooo1

cloverchronicle.com/2019/03/08/yanggang-exposed-insider-claims-2020-hopeful-andrew-yang-is-paying-groups-of-online-meme-operators-to-influence-voters/

"Yang Gang 2020": gg/bwpMQZB
"YangGang": gg/cb35dYS
"Totally Yang 2020 Official Discord": gg/gXDDzkJ

Yea, if you search Andrew Yang and go on google images, there is a lot of articles and shit saying he is the new Alt Right candidate, this a problem that needs to be solved

Poor people have a higher marginal propensity to consume. So Yang is correct.

Yang will win, the memes are clearly on his side.

If the money is being taken from a rich jew who would just spend it on other rich jews its going nowhere

Attached: Yang-Redpill.jpg (3000x3152, 1.21M)

I don't see the problem, retards have been sabotaging it from the beginning.

Consumption is only good for the economy when it liberates your ability to produce something more valuable than what you're consuming.

You're an engineer and you spend 30$ in a sweater cause making it yourself would cost you a lot of hours, that consumption just saved you hours, thus you're able to produce valuable engineering.

Poor people consuming is not good for the economy in any way.

>favela monkey

Leftist are calling the memes childish, racist, violent, and they're right.
The gooks on video saying Asians are the new Jews, hey whites are eventually going to genocide them. And that's why they need the freedom dividend, to stop whitey.

Brazil calling anyone a retard
YANG 2020

Attached: 1552593534213.jpg (741x720, 70K)

>The money already exists, if the person getting the 1000 dollars expends this money, the economy stays the same!!
>the only way to ever improve the economy would be to print more fiat
Yeah this seems like a post from an expert in economics

The majority of it will go back to the Dominican Republic, Mexico, etc.

Attached: 1552519695067.png (1580x484, 111K)

>if i add pink hats to old memes I wont have to get a job

lol

This

>Andrew Yang has a limited knowledge about economies, if you take 1000 dollars from someone and give this 1000 dollars to someones else, does that improve economy in any way?
Shut up, retard. You have no idea what you're talking about

Companies have to sell to someone.

just mock them like every other shill raid that's happened. jidf srs shareblue etc etc etc all have done the same thing and failed. Dont get booty blasted just make fun of them

And where do corporations get the money? It's literally just taking water that's gone through an hydroplant and ferrying the water back to the top for twice the cost of what you get out of it.

Attached: 1535755437483.jpg (221x250, 13K)

jfc you lolbertarians are really dumb as fuck

>Poor people consuming is not good for the economy in any way

When are you giving your Ted Talk?

Actually most legal marijuana production is in the United States either by dispensaries or new pharma companies because it becomes less profitable to hump it illegally from the Dominican Republic and Mexico.

Attached: original.jpg (772x558, 99K)

Would you rather have the wealth accumulate more or less statically in Jewish and Jew corporation hands?

The flow of water is economic activity. If the water is concentrated in the top of the plant it will dry out the productive roots and crush the bottom of the hydroplant. Exactly the situation approaching in the US. And if you looked at my infographic, the top of the plant is automating away its roots so they can cut them up for fertilizer or just leave them to shrivel and die.

WE'RE GONNA HAVE UBI AND WE'RE GONNA MAKE THE CORPORATIONS PAY FOR IT!

>Haha support my Neetbux dude it's totally da joos!
It's like a really fucking bad attempt to "fit in" while shilling.

Thats exactly what I said, well done nordcuck

You're dense if you don't see where the wealth is going.

And your dense if you think taking it from them and giving it away like Robin-Hood is going to solve any problems. They will just claw it back. Something given for free has no value.

You're*
>oof

if i got $1000 dollaz a month id spend it on weed bruh

Aside from price inflation none of you brainlets have thought about this. What happens if people just hoard the money instead? Nobody forces them to spend it. Say goodbye to the dollar. I kind of wish Yang wins so all the spics, niggers, and white traitors get the Venezuela treatment they deserve.

>"You put 1000 dollars a month on their hand, it's going right back into the economy, they are going to expend it on food, child care, car repairs, nights out..."
>We'll just use taxpayer money to bolster the economy
He really is a fucking retard.
Ain't Asians supposed to be smart and shit?

Attached: ancient facepalm.jpg (1024x683, 102K)

The rest of your post sucked too.

Brazilians are the best posters on Jow Forums.
Prove me wrong.

BASED BLACK MAN

Recirculating the money increases demand and economic activity, which is better than letting it sit in some rich Jew's bank account.

Money is an exchange of labor for labor.
You work, you get paid for your labor.
You use money to pay for other people's labor.
Welfare is the death of societies.
This shit will devalue the dollar so much it'll make mid 90s Serbian dinar look like gold fucking bullion.

Sounds like you were cursed with a low IQ. The money in the bank doesn't just sit around, retard. The bank lends it to businesses and people to buy things. Only people of very low intelligence and even lower moral character use the "steal idle money because it helps the economy" tactic. You are a very stupid person.

twitter.com/N1TRO_DUBZ/status/1106028528578056192

>UH HUH
>I DONT CARE ABOUT YO FUCKIN KIKES UH
>YAW
>IMMA CATCH A BAG AND HIT A DANCE UH
>BRRRRRTTTTT
>WE GONNA HIT THE LICK WE GOT A PLAN UH

Attached: YANGGANG.png (551x303, 389K)

Get in faggots

Attached: 1552505129929.png (500x583, 115K)

> if you take 1000 dollars from someone and give this 1000 dollars to someones else, does that improve economy in any way?
His platform is not "The economy first", it's "humanity first". You do realize this don't you? His goal isn't to improve GDP or the economy in general, its essentially wealth redistribution (from those who spend the most money to the general pool of the economy). Whoever spends more will pay more into the pool.

> The money already exists, if the person getting the 1000 dollars expends this money, the economy stays the same!!
Ok, if you have rich person (A) and he has $100 million and poor person (B) and they have $10 and rich person (A) has to give $1 million of his $100 million to poor person (B) the overall economy is the same $100 million + $10 but the poor person has a higher quality of life. Do you get this? There are much better criticisms of his policies than your stupid autistic level 1 libertarian screed. The better question is how Yang will prevent the wealthy from wiggling out of paying which they no doubt would.

Attached: 1552077227106.jpg (640x427, 43K)