What's the difference?

What's the difference?

Attached: 1552730789480.jpg (643x748, 113K)

none. same people too

On the first incident, muslims are killing a muslim.

sandniggers acting like niggers VS whites acting like niggers

One is a woman he could have easily overpowered while they other is a beta policeman

One forgot to tie their shoes that morning

I can still find charlie hebdo shooting on Youtube

durr what's the difference they're both socialists who carried out campaigns of violence!

Attached: 200px-Nazi-SovietEcoRelations_Quad_1940.png (200x271, 56K)

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 22K)

Their team vs our team

One was forgotten and the other will never be allowed to be forgotten.
No prizes for which.

part and parcel either way desu

he cute

One is fighting the good fight

Attached: file.png (1421x692, 840K)

This is pretty accurate

Conquest vs defense

war never changes.

let's assume the cop was white (he wasn't)

in the first case it's invaders killing locals

the second it's locals killing invaders

that's the difference nigger

Attached: 5488654.png (224x225, 11K)

None.
This is multiculturalism I. Action

aggression vs retaliation

top is for a movie bottom is for real life is the difference

/thread

Muslim are sub humans

both are false flags

This person gets it.
The people who pushed for "minorities" (the majority of the world) to be brought into our culture are responsible for the deaths of both the white and brown children. They create conflict everywhere to drive down wages and steal property. No Muslims in France and none in New Zealand saves Whites and Muslims.

>HELP ME HELP ME HELP ME HELP ME
was she retarded or just an NPC?

>No Muslims in France and none in New Zealand saves Whites and Muslims.

Attached: 1514396379244.png (741x568, 43K)

the top was committed by invaders

the bottom was committed against invaders

>dead muslim
>dead muslim
no difference really

Japan save our case again

>Paris
>Muslim invaders killing natives
>NZ
>Natives killing muslims invaders

professionalism?

One dresses Hugo Boss, the other ones are plebs

>outsiders killing local people who accepten them to their land
>local person doing halal by folowing "eye for an eye" against invaders.
... are you stupid? RGEs example fits here - if someone invades your house and starts shooting are you not going to shoot back because "that would make you just like invader"?

The Muslim would have raped the woman, prior to blowing her brains out.

This. I'm pretty sure OP is baiting, no one can be this retarded.

Attached: 1552743452887.png (677x849, 588K)

There was no sound but the French man probably cried harder than the woman.

savage Japan at it again

Attached: poop-on-the-kitchen-table.jpg (1273x398, 250K)

Top: Invaders vs natives
Bottom: Natives vs invaders
Nigger

I have no interest in killing Muslims if there isn't a mosque in my town.
If there isn't a mosque in my town, Muslims are less likely to shoot me.
This is complicated by the Jews and Wahabis creating a war for the Middle East generally, but simply put, we should create peaceful societies within our own borders, and this comes from the unwillingness to let ethnic societies be ethnic societies. If Jews or Christians moved to most Middle Eastern countries en mass, they would also quickly find themselves victims of the locals coming in with available fire arms.

Attached: 1552791660992.gif (607x609, 821K)

makes sense. Thanks for explaining

Attached: 1497220817105.gif (225x249, 808K)