COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum..
There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a 'uncontrolled forum.'
Technique #1 - 'FORUM SLIDING'
If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by 'forum sliding.' In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to 'age.' Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a 'forum slide.' The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a 'forum slide' and 'flush' the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then 'replying' to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting 'slides' down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.
A second highly effective technique (which you can see in operation all the time at www.abovetopsecret.com) is 'consensus cracking.' To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made - but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger 'evidence' or disinformation in your favour is slowly 'seeded in.' Thus the uninformed reader will most like develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped. However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then 'abort' the consensus cracking by initiating a 'forum slide.'
Jaxson Russell
Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION'
Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a 'RESOURCE BURN.' By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a 'gossip mode.' In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to 'drive in the wedge.' By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.
Hudson Sullivan
Technique #4 - 'INFORMATION COLLECTION'
Information collection is also a very effective method to determine the psychological level of the forum members, and to gather intelligence that can be used against them. In this technique in a light and positive environment a 'show you mine so me yours' posting is initiated. From the number of replies and the answers that are provided much statistical information can be gathered. An example is to post your 'favourite weapon' and then encourage other members of the forum to showcase what they have. In this matter it can be determined by reverse proration what percentage of the forum community owns a firearm, and or a illegal weapon. This same method can be used by posing as one of the form members and posting your favourite 'technique of operation.' From the replies various methods that the group utilizes can be studied and effective methods developed to stop them from their activities.
Statistically, there is always a percentage of the forum posters who are more inclined to violence. In order to determine who these individuals are, it is a requirement to present a image to the forum to deliberately incite a strong psychological reaction. From this the most violent in the group can be effectively singled out for reverse IP location and possibly local enforcement tracking. To accomplish this only requires posting a link to a video depicting a local police officer massively abusing his power against a very innocent individual. Statistically of the million or so police officers in America there is always one or two being caught abusing there powers and the taping of the activity can be then used for intelligence gathering purposes - without the requirement to 'stage' a fake abuse video. This method is extremely effective, and the more so the more abusive the video can be made to look. Sometimes it is useful to 'lead' the forum by replying to your own posting with your own statement of violent intent, and that you 'do not care what the authorities think!!' inflammation. By doing this and showing no fear it may be more effective in getting the more silent and self-disciplined violent intent members of the forum to slip and post their real intentions. This can be used later in a court of law during prosecution.
Kevin Flores
Technique #6 - 'GAINING FULL CONTROL'
It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position. Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavourable postings - and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public. This is the 'ultimate victory' as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline. By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a 'honey pot' gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes.
Jason Cruz
CONCLUSION
Remember these techniques are only effective if the forum participants DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM. Once they are aware of these techniques the operation can completely fail, and the forum can become uncontrolled. At this point other avenues must be considered such as initiating a false legal precidence to simply have the forum shut down and taken offline. This is not desirable as it then leaves the enforcement agencies unable to track the percentage of those in the population who always resist attempts for control against them. Many other techniques can be utilized and developed by the individual and as you develop further techniques of infiltration and control it is imperative to share then with HQ.
like i need your autistic instructions to be able to spot a shill or an agent.
Robert Myers
Return to the_donald
Brody Campbell
Wonder if Jow Forums has become a honey pot at this point. It also seems that the users have wised up to the agents, though.
Anthony Hill
What is the purpose of your post?
Easton Adams
Meme flags were incorporated for this sole reason. If you see someone using them, he shouldn't be trusted. An user who browses Jow Forums of all places would think it preferrable to represent his own country in his posts. Meme flags are used by outsiders.
Colton Bell
Well fuck me im a jew and I need to change that. What do?
I get a lulz watching two accounts/users having an endless argument with eachother. I usually suspect they are trolls trying to bait people.
Another thing I never do is respond to name calling or personal attacks. It keeps things comfy.
Jackson Nelson
I've noticed this on /v/, and gangweed is clearly part of the picture. They're trying to pretend /v/ was ever at any point liberal and that now is openly nigger loving.
Daniel Wilson
Google has these indexes right away.
Robert Hall
W...why are you helping us? This is one of the finest posts in the annals of Jow Forums. This is up there with the Shrek hands post of lore.
Zachary Davis
Very necessary thread given we are under siege. Part of the siege is redpilling unsuspecting normies.
Thomas Bell
Could you make one for spotting stormweenies? It seems that their shilling has gone unchecked for some time now.
Eli Ortiz
How to recognize a shill:
Step #1-9001 Someone who doesn't agree with you.
Dominic Williams
lol wat. The purpose of country flags is to attack the persons country instead of their argument. And it'd not like getting a proxy and having whatever fucking flag you want is hard so it doesn't prove you're not a shill. Finally, why are Jow Forumsacks so obsessed with themselves that they think actual organized and politically motivated elements (not just trolls having fun) would actually coordinate slide threads, bait and spam to keep some super secret red pills from getting out on a Trinidadian bee keeping forum. No one actually believes this right?
Anthony Russell
Just posting revelent info for the newfags
While your at it i would recommend you get the full paladin press ebook collection (don't pay for it obviously)
they arent national socialists but probably of those aryanist muslim thirld worlder scizo nigger types that believe hitler wanted europe to be multiculturally enriched because he allied with muslims out of convenience and because the war was already lost in 1943
Justin Miller
I see a ton of shills start calling their accusers shills to throw newfags off.
I didn't write it, feel free to add this when you post it yourself
Ryan Brown
THIS THREAD IS NOW BEING DERAILED
Michael Brooks
>The purpose of country flags is to attack the persons country instead of their argument. Your argument is upside down. The purpose of a country flag is to provide context. How many times, for example, do you think people answered to me with something like "I can't believe a fucking hue wrote this"?
A flag is meant for one thing: it will provide the context of your post and you as an individual for other people reading the post. So, two situations arise:
-If you post dumb shit and you live in a dumb country, your flag will be congruent to what you wrote, and anons WILL laugh at you for it;
-If your post is good and you're from a shithole, your country flag will do one other thing beyond providing context: display a comedic contrast.
This is why meme flags are inherently bad posters. I wear my flag with pride.
Unfortunately that would decrease the number of people who read it.
Parker Martin
I have been on this website longer than you've been using the Internet. Anyone who needs a tutorial on how to use Jow Forums needs to run the fuck back to r/the_donald pronto. As do you boomers. If you were less retarded, you would condense your guide into a pastebin. Your reddit spacing is just the cherry on top.
It's boring to read the established rules and terms of service if you can jump in right away. I only read the pinned thread about faulty arguments once I myself noticed them, and wanted to learn more. You wouldn't read it unless you're interested, and if you're interested you'll already know about it by researching on your own.
Notice how they're totally ignoring this. They've been doing this with every single thread that attempts to start any actual discussion.
Gavin Bell
Read the info and stay skeptical of all posters (including me) even if they agree with your ideology it may just be a ploy to pull the wool over your eyes
retarded pavian.. another method used by shill is posting unrelated bimbos next to their text..
James Lewis
>argument Arguments can be productive. Usually not because it becomea about being right. This is a big problem with the internet in general; better to just read and leave opinions and insights.
I don't know mate. I just lurk and read shit. The last few days this site has been turned upside down by a bunch of people being really angry when someone questions the official story of the nz shooting. You can tell these aren't regular people on this site because questioning narratives is what drew people here all along. Reading anger in posts that question narratives was usually rare here.
