>We are dope,
>and we do dope shit.
youtube.com
Fact: real men are christians
David Lopez
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
books.google.ca
twitter.com
Jordan Fisher
>t. A boy whose mother orgasmed so hard her toes curled up and her eyes rolled back when she was making love to an Iranian man
Joseph Lee
lol we don't give Iranians visas...
Lincoln Stewart
What the fuck is Christian to you, if not catholic or orthodox you can kys
Hudson Mitchell
yup,
catholic, orthodox and some anglicans
Michael Rodriguez
Based
Proper catholics also deny the second vatican council.
Adrian Rogers
Fuck Anglo heresy
Gabriel Wood
I do m8
Isaiah Rogers
only an emperor coronated by the pope can convene an ecumenical council ;)
neither vatican council is valid really.
or at least there was no precedent, except maybe during the pornocracy, but otto the great burned all that shit.
Grayson Miller
Leon XII best pope,
Rerum Novarun best enciclica of his, bashing both degenerated capitalism and not working socialism
Effects of this you could've seen in Portugal during Estado Novo, which economy was designed as interpretation of this, growth was from 6% to 12% without degenerative population
Owen Allen
en.wikipedia.org
High Anglicans are less heretical than the orthodox I think.
plus anglo catholics are a thing now in NA
Angel Gonzalez
I take issue with the papal institution. Since it was asspulled by the franks to establish a separate western empire. Filioque caused a problem within the concept of trinity, by subjugating the Holy Spirit to the Son as well as the Father. This led to the institution, which supposedly inherited the Son's position on earth, to being able to manipulate the Holy Spirit.
Pretty high heresy if you ask me, unfortunately not many people understand this effect of a small adjustment of dogma.
Robert Parker
you don't understand late Roman history if you believe that, and you don't understand the pope or church's role if you think they inherited jesus' position on earth.
the Filioque is necessary if the logos is eternal.
the pope was free to crown an emperor on two accounts. The western Augusts was in abeyance, and the eastern Augustus was a woman and therefore was in abeyance because a woman couldn't possess an estate
Gabriel Martinez
What the fuck am I looking at here?
Michael Davis
How can niggers compete
Luke Morris
More like real fucking DELUSIONAL
Joshua Price
>you don't understand late Roman history if you believe that
What precisely?
>and you don't understand the pope or church's role if you think they inherited jesus' position on earth.
Bro, this is the Catholic position..
Pope is the vicar of Christ. Technically this makes him able to play around with the HS, thus being able to correct dogma by means of ex cathedra etc.
>the Filioque is necessary if the logos is eternal.
No it isn't. Logos is obviously eternal, but the HS flowing from the Son isn't necessary at all.
>western Augusts
implying
Daniel Young
>and you don't understand the pope or church's role if you think they inherited jesus' position on earth.
Then why does the pope hold the title Vicarius Filii Dei? Why do the clergy reffer to the pope as Holy Father? That's pretty blasphemous.
The Representative of Christ carrying around a silver pole depicting Jesus dead on the cross? Pretty blasphemous.
Samuel Thomas
man im tired... I dont wannna splain it :P
imperial dignity was invested in both the east and west.
en.wikipedia.org
the estate of western emporer had fallen into abeyance because he wasn't needed because the west didn't need one. When the west needed one again we crowned one and the western imperial dignity was moved to the Germans from the Latins, it was combined again in the later Roman empire after new rome fell to the turks.
now they both are in abeyance until the pope and the patriarch coronate new ones.
Ian Barnes
>Vicarius Filii Dei
Do you know what vicar means?
>Representative
he holds the dignity of peter
he is Christs chief agent on earth
Cameron Wood
This sounds like making dogma the subject of Roman law. Dunno, I'll get into it.
I'll just finish with that this sounds like some serious rationalizing, along the lines of pic related. The pic is obviously true though, I'm just illustrating a point here.
Jackson Morgan
tearing the unity of the body of christ in two over one word and pride... pretty demonic
;)
Colton Hall
He holds the dignity of Peter? Why does he have men bow before him? Peter didn't allow that. Neither did the angels.
Logan Brown
no the other way around actually
Christendom grew out of the rootstock of Roman law
en.wikipedia.org
the rest is called estates and additions and I really dont have the energy to teach you that.
Juan Bell
have you tried looking honestly for the answer to that?
you might be surprised.
but Im not the right guy to explain that
ummm whats his name...
youtube.com
he might cover it
Xavier Russell
books.google.ca
that gets into it a bit