Should food be a human right?

This sounds ok on paper but like everything that sounds ok, they will use it to somehow fuck things up more, like decide that all immigrants get free food hand outs but then bump the supermarket prices up so everyone else has to struggle

We already get this.
unemployed people (and other people) get a basic income (that they can spend on whatever they want) and their rent payed. For people that for some reason can't deal with that there are food banks

>Food banks provide a minimum of three-days’ nutritionally balanced, non-perishable tinned and dried foods
>Alongside the standardfood parcel, food banks try to providesome essential non-food items to adults and children. Toiletries, Household items, Feminine products –,Baby supplies

Fuck it at this point everything is a human right. not like we give a fuck about ignoring human rights when push comes to shove or anything.

When ever anyone starts banging on about a "right" to X, you immediately know what they really mean is they want free X provided to them by someone else's hard work.
Niggers. Not once.

>The government said it was committed to protecting internationally-recognised human rights.
>The commission said this right - which involves food being accessible, adequate and available for everyone - is not being realised across Scotland.
>International law is clear that governments have obligations to take action to ensure people's right to food is realised.
>The Scottish Human Rights Commission is calling on the government to take action to incorporate the right to food into Scotland's laws as part of its work to make Scotland a good food nation.
>"We want to see the Scottish government showing human rights leadership in a practical way."

having an international human right is bit different than

>a right to food which is directly enforceable under Scots law

governments sign the treaties and ignore them.
but another law will work this time for sure

You have a right to anything you can pay for in a voluntary exchange.

The world owes you nothing.

sounds pretty based

it worked with the other human rights law, so much so that the government wanted to get rid of the UK human rights act. It was one of the problems people had with the EU too with their dislike of the European court of Human rights.

amnesty.org.uk/eight-reasons-why-human-rights-act-has-made-uk-better-place-british-bill-of-rights

are you allowed to quote your wifes boyfriend like that?

>thinking pricing something that is a right now is even possible at all in the slightest

No one deserves anything

In short, you want to give the government the power to enslave me as a farmer in order to support those who refuse to work.
Just more enslaving whites to keep the nigger breeding program.

if food is a human right then farmers are slaves. any time you claim a service or product as a right you're saying we need to point guns at certain people to guarantee their labor

Enjoy your bowel cancer, manly man who is totally manly.

They don't have many Africans in Scotland

>spoke to people experiencing food poverty in Scotland, including a mother who lives with her one-year-old son in a rural area.
>She said: "My universal credit was delayed and I had 85p left in my bank account.
>I had run out of nappies and wipes and was worried I would have no money for milk or food for my son if it did not come through.
>"I had a food parcel delivered recently and I think I'll need another this week.
>To reach a low-cost supermarket is a three-mile walk, making it a six-mile round trip on foot with my baby in a buggy.
>"To get the bus would cost me £5, which would take a significant chunk out of my weekly food budget."

show ur flag jew

Retards. Ask a soldier about eating gummint food.

Fuck off its not other peoples job to feed her mistake.

Gubment Haggis? yuck

put it to a vote
you probably have the psychopath vote.
it's funny after ww2 people were a lot more generous.

A lot of our food comes from abroad. We also have free health care which is ranked as one of the best in the world. Nobody would realistically claim that the health care professionals are held at gunpoint or forced to provide their service.

it could even provide healthier food which would be better for so society. Poor people often make bad food choices

Actually eating grains and plants produce cancer.
Cancer cells feed on carbohydrates not on fat or cholesterol.
Keto diet is used as a complementary treatment for cancer.

The growth hormone in some animal products could fuck you up if you have cancer, but that's like choosing your favorite poison.

Veganism is a system designed to create neutered slaves. The coupe de grace to the male problem.

The more you normalize this the more people will figure out they don't have to do shit for their food. You essentially halted all progress be it technological or otherwise just by giving out free food to every failure. It's ironic that a Christian has to say this but what happened to Darwinism?

It really is tiresome as the train of leftist ideology derails further and further, even just replying to their gibberish. This makes so little sense, formulating a response gives it more credit than it deserves.

>famine
>wtf government violating my rights???
>die

wonder why people became doctors before 1973

youtube.com/watch?v=fZN8i96T3ic

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-04-15 04-36-45.png (611x448, 75K)

so it's just free health care, education, rent, child support, unemployment benefits and Carer's Allowance then?

it will be used to justify going after whites when they turn permacultural and off the grid and led the shitskins and citycucks starve.

>Give Scotland power to create laws
>Over spend, & spends like a niggar country
>Bankrupting Scotland

Well done SNP, well done!

Attached: haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.gif (244x230, 898K)

>adequate
You realize that just means bread and maybe some peanut butter (no jelly, that is more than adequate), it's considered adequate for most inmates. It does not mean you will get food choice, high quality food, or specific dietary needs.

Should food be a human right?

no, rights are only negative (no one is allowed to do bad things to you i.e. murder you-right to life, steal from you-right to property, silence you-right to freedom of speach etc.)

Positive rights do not exist i.e. making someone DO something for you, educate you, give you food, give you healthcare etc. We leverage some of the cost via social spending but the provided are privileges, not rights.

You can't expect people to do shit for you just because, that's called slavery.

>People don’t have [thing]
>Solution is passing a law saying people must have thing
>Result is nobody has thing

I hate this farce and how widely applied it is.

Attached: 1481192905001 sociopath test.png (588x776, 160K)

>everything is a human right.

Yes but damn is it hilarious news, This is obviously a marketing ploy for some politician or would work with a very secluded group like fucking Scotland. All they do is sit on their ass and look pretty. All this money and not much expenses.

Is a sad state when people just assume that a right to something means the government should be forced to provide it. These cretins vote.

well the free market or libertarians don't care if people eat. but most people do

youtube.com/watch?v=s_4Rmb2wvJ4

Attached: Screenshot at 2019-02-09 16-49-27.png (358x250, 67K)

>Positive rights

Don't make me laugh.

>eat. but most people do

In any country but ones with very opposing views in dictatorship(ie third world shit sand-niggers and African niggers). less than 1% can't eat. Any 2md or !st world has given their population plenty to eat. In first world, it comes down how healthy is "what we eat:.

Attached: 46114908_129811968012275_41942181128555037_n.jpg (720x720, 30K)

this is why socialism has to be destroyed

Attached: muammar-gaddafi-demonised-by-the-west-but-here-are-the-5286364.png (500x610, 166K)

just give them a bottle of onions and tell them to fuck off

lol these cucks even filter s o y l e n t

>argentinian commenting about meat
based

we have all this kinda stuff already.

>policeprotection of person and property and theright to counsel, as well aseconomic, social and cultural rightssuch asfood,housing,public education,employment,national security,military,health care,social security,internet access, and a minimumstandard of living.

In a modern society ensuring people at the bottom of society have access to basic food is not going to turn people into slaves

So instead of niggers, single mothers who are already on welfare. Unless the guy died shes 95% likely to be at fault.

Positive rights are slavery because you are forcing someone else to be responsible for something owed to you. What happens if there’s some crisis and food is unavailable?

Negative rights are merely things the government can’t do (and enforcing them is ultimately your responsibility)

The child is not at fault for the bad choices it's mother has made and should be helped but it isn't the responsibility of an individual to support anyone in need. As garbage as they are, social services would provide a better life for the child than the mother could. Someone has to pay and work for the food they eat. Life isn't free and isn't a right.

>In a modern society ensuring people at the bottom of society have access to basic food

Are you fucking retarded? All modern societies have given their population access to food. Many people at the very-> bottom feeding pillars--< of modern society, have the ability to complain they don't have access to food, but No it's actually very difficult to starve to death. In any modern society those who starve to death due to lack of "access to food" is because, like you, they''re fucking retarded.

Yes because they have made it more difficult for people with an IQ under 90 to function in society

An irn-bru in every hand, and a deep fried mars bar in every pocket

Hungry for jelly donuts right now

Because such marriages almost never work out.
You believe that you bring a foreign woman to your country and she wont quickly miss her family, friends, culture and so on?
Once the effect of living in the West has worn off she'll divorce and sue your ass for all you've got.
Also women there have absolutely unrealistic ideas about what life in the West is like.
In her mind everyone in the West lives in a mansion and has two nice cars. If you bring her to your small apartment or don't have the status she imagine you're in a world of pain.

I wonder what kind of person thinks other people don't necessarily deserve to eat .

I'm guessing the survival of the fittest types.

People who fall the all the variants of Individualist or Materialist ideologies.
Normal people who do realise that we are in a sense herd animals cannot grasp this way of thinking.

i think to deny people access to food is a violation but making food a human right is a bit silly.

many people on government gibs spend their money on alcohol, drugs and tobacco.

Oops, posted in the wrong thread, lol

if you had to trick her into coming you deserve it

Go get a license to wank you bong. Police suck ass at protecting anyone, individuals should protect themselves. Law is a complex as fuck process and public defenders suck as much ass as police. All of those services cost someone something. Should the government own land and tell farmers what to grow on it?

Yes but food is abundant and cheap in this country, the only people who struggle are the irresponsible and the parasitic. Why would I want them to eat at all, let alone at my expense?

Our farmers and yours get billions in subsidies and gibs. The idea there is not a load of other services and shit provided is ridiculous.
Farmers in Europe get money literally to not farm the land.

why pay their rent, bills, education and healthcare then.
You might even save on some of those bills of they were eating healthy food

>be heroin addict
>drain on the system
>rob wagecucks both literally and figuratively
>free house
>pop out illegitimate children everywhere for more free money
>strain the NHS
>now get free food from Government
>contribute nothing

Whats even the point of being a wagey at this point?

>human right
They should update the definition of a "human" then

Attached: nigger skull shape gorilla.jpg (1246x519, 137K)

The chimp is even called 'mufukka'

>FOOD SHOULD BE A HUMAN RIGHT!

**gives food to "starving" Muslim refugees**

>REEEE NOT THE RIGHR KIND OF FOOD, ALLUHA SNAKKBARR!!!

Nah, food is for those with the means to buy it or intelligence to grow it. Not my fault some Africans still haven't figured out agriculture. Let them starve.

KEK

Attached: 1555274610464.jpg (604x395, 61K)

Scotland is and always will be a freeloading welfare state. Of course they'd enshrine something like that knowing full well it'd be England footing the bill for all those deep fried pizzas.

>Food is a human right
>speech is not
Only in Clownworld™

Housing and food should be human rights just as to be free.