Trump vs Sanders 2020

A
FUCKING
LEAF

That's the opposite of the truth. Trump has already lost the midwest and rust belt, which was the only reason he won in 2016.

Boinie
Blormf won't win the rust belt this time

So was Stalin.

Bernie. He is just so professional and Presidential looking, unlike Trump.

lmao 75% chance you are a fatass

healthdata.org/news-release/vast-majority-american-adults-are-overweight-or-obese-and-weight-growing-problem-among

kys retard

Trump

Bernie can appeal to the lunatic fringe and lose any sane voters or appeal to moderates and the fringe-soaked msm will tear him apart. If he appeals to moderates and has the balls to tell crazies and media to fuck off like Trump did, I think he can take it.

Trump would win. Not a landslide, but a win. Dependency on very young voters isn't going to get Bernie a victory. People don't understand the fundamental wedge in the Democratic party. The progressive/socialist left who are mostly under 35, and the centrists/anti-Trumpers who constitute most older Democrats. No matter who the nominee is, a significant amount of their party won't be on board.

>Kasich
The results are already in, he has almost no support outside of his own state.

Attached: 2947_08_06_16_2_38_27.png (1513x983, 184K)

Trump can afford to lose Michigan and Wisconsin if he keeps PA and everything else. This is his most realistic win scenario.

Attached: WDv3X.png (1050x670, 124K)

Depends on whether Democrat Party fixers double down and try to fix the general in Trump's favor.

can't win an election if you spend the money on a fourth house.

>Trump
>Pennsylvania
I have some really bad news for you

Worst landslide since Carter Reagan, I'll let you figure out which side would get rekt

Trump spends more money paying off his mistresses than Sanders pays for his houses

Alternative Trump win path. This one highlights how he only needs one "blue" Rust Belt state to win if all else remains consistent from 2016. Bernie may be popular in this part of the country, but he's also polarizing. He didn't clobber Clinton in the 2016 primaries in this area by any means. At least one of these states (MN, WI, MI, PA) will go to Trump.

Attached: zkem4.png (1050x670, 125K)

>fringe left
Shouldn't you kill yourself for being a circumcised neoliberal shill?

Attached: 1528499099291.png (629x505, 78K)

Trump.
(D) coalition needs black turnout.

Attached: blackview[1].gif (499x433, 5K)

ate you fucking high? he’ll win in wisconsin before pa, especially if you look at the midterms
which by that map would give a 269-269 tie lmao
t.pafag

Trump.
Sanders is not going to beat Trump.
He might have before but the Dems cucked him so bad.
No, I think the Dems best bet is to find someone no one knows anything about. Have him spout right wing views at his appearances. Then when he wins, he rules any way he wants to.
That's how the Dems beat the Trump.

They pretty much have to lie the whole way to the whitehouse.

Democrats are "the party of anti-Semitism" now though.

Pete Buttigieg?

S E E T H I N G

Bernie is a kike

Not really. They need to mobilize the 40% of people who won't show up for a centrist or a right-winger.

>t.le_donald, now with 50% more daddy issues

That's a very flattering drumpf picture. hahaha

see Wisconsin gives a win as well, just a much closer one. Even in the event of a 269-269 tie, the Republican Senate chooses the president.

Trump probably. Unaffiliated and unengaged voters will hear “socialism” and lean republican. Our economy is doing alright so that helps the incumbent- if it is still okay next year.
Trump would be at risk because he will be running on his accomplishments which are poor overall.
So I think it would be a toss up leaning a bit in Trumps favor. Not a sure thing either way.

How so when it's the righties sucking Jew cock left and right?

Joe Biden is the only candidate that the left has that could beat Trump

>Unaffiliated and unengaged voters will hear “socialism”
and literally not give a fuck what a bunch of dead kikes think.
Moderates are a fringe group and literally irrelevant.
CAP shills pls go

Grope yourself fatally, neoliberal.

What's up with these Neo-liberals invading Jow Forums now? Biden doesn't even have a shot if he can't even get his fellow Shill Obama to vouch for him.

Attached: 1555057729147.gif (960x540, 1.74M)

Bernie is a stupid jew, so Trump

Yang of course. No one cares about these crusty old men. Get the bag.

Attached: IMG_1116.jpg (253x229, 12K)

Young Republicans gobbling the dicks of their masters in exchange for preferential nepotism. You know, shilling.

Stop shilling this neoliberal gook

That’s not how a tie is broken - but the result would be Trump win if it tied, yes.

I think Bernie would have had a better chance than Hillary in 2016. But at this point it's impossible for Trump not to win in 2016 statistically, unless some major happening occurs to change the timeline somehow.

Biden will be the nominee, but he won't beat Trump.

Sanders but he was meant for 2016 and was told to sit down by Hillary and did. He lacks the backbone to fight the good fight so i suspect the same again. Some fag like Beto will get the nomination through cheating and even if Bernie would be the frobt runner he will sit down once again.

Tulsi is the only one I have faith thay will NOT back down to the establiment and will cause a revolution by not allowing the voice of the people to be denied by the Clinton clique.

Tulsi is the champion of the people. Sanders is a cowardly old man.

Everyone says they like that stuff until they find out how much it will cost.

Has he? What evidence do you have of that? Rally in michigan recently supposedly was much larger than his final 2016 campaign rally in the same place.

No one. There will be war in the streets by 2020

Tarl spotted

Attached: 45447449_1064984533674928_3415838338626617344_n.jpg (226x249, 6K)

heh heh

Stupid unengaged voters are at least 5-10% and are the ones who reply to pollsters as “undecided”. They broke for Trump in 2016 but are back to being undecided or having mildly poor opinions of Trump.

Turns out it costs less than paying private kikes to deliver the services. Every. Single. Time.
Even the (((Cato))) Institute was forced to admit it. Do you have too many psychological problems secondary to your circumcision to follow suit?

The other half of them will flip towards Trump in the same way.

is this what you retards actually believe?

>hes lost the rust belt
According to fucking what? are you really so desperate you just throw out retarded ideas hoping someone believes you?

Biden would crush Trump. Biden will crush the upper mid west (game over) - maybe winning Ohio. Unironically true and you know it.

That doesn’t happen, they lean (as a group) one way or the other and that’s how close elections break and determine the winner.

>seething trumpfag/bernbro triggered in few minutes after yang posting

Y u mad though? No wall? Maybe some bag would cheer you up.

I'm not joking when I say I really believe Trump will defeat him. Democrats always run their worst candidate with extreme baggage, and are surprised when they lose. This will be similar.

The Bernie meme is over, Trump wins due to no competition

Undecided voters are those who are considered likely (handwave handwave) or registered, but haven't decided. Yet, 40% or more of the eligible adult population fails to vote, presumably because neither of the "two" right-wing authoritarian major parties serve them. If someone offering something other than the enforcement of (((rules))) and (((stations))) were to make it into the general election, I suspect that a double-digit percentage of them could be drawn to the polls.
Cope harder, though. I like the taste of your tears.

Attached: 1549913594246.png (960x960, 435K)

Then you cannot read the electorate. Biden’s poll numbers didn’t move an inch with all the reports of him being handsy with ladies and that’s his baggage. Trump has 4 years of not delivering on specific promises as baggage. Biden has nowhere close to HER baggage, who does, so compared to Trump it’s no contest.
As to your point that Dems pick terribad candidates that find was to lose...absolutely correct there friend. That’s why Biden probably won’t win.

Win the dem nomination that is.

Nobody likes a wimp, and Bernie will be mercilessly ridiculed as the lying down, lap-dog who allowed Shillary to lose.

And with institutions like Wall St, Goldman Sachs stating Trump's election is likely...I think we already know who is going top prevail.

Notice my "quotes of sarcasm."

Muhfellow mercans voted for a faggot nigger, why wouldnt they vote for a faggot jew?

Time will tell. Who do you think will win the Dem nomination?

He isn't even running. Why the fuck is he even in the polls other than kike tricks?
GTFO Democrat establishment shill.

>literally flocks of people raiding from donaldblr
Don't project your daddy issues onto others, crippledick.

I’m crying? I don’t particularly care who wins desu - it’s all the same shit with a slightly different flavor to keep us entertained. As for enjoying tears a Trump win would make the lefty media go bonkers -again. Alternatively, I can come here to watch the newfucks from plebit cry. So win/win in my book, I just know how voting patterns work and am explaining it, patiently, to you.

Registered undecided are not a huge % of the voting public. But they do show up at a certain rate and how they decide standing in the poll both is how very close elections are decided. This is a fact, go read up on shit son.

compared to the billionaire-cucked establishments of both parties he is.
although the term "nationalist" is way too strong, as with everything in america the billionaires have pushed the overton window so far that believing in nationhood is now "nationalist"

Attached: 1550621125549.webm (790x442, 2.82M)

Seriously though, who do you think will with the Dem nomination?

Attached: 1545223844254.png (625x626, 63K)

That’s unclear. Old Jimmy Carter was at like 2% at this point in the 76 cycle. Dems can do wierd things. Repubs tend to line up behind a guy - recent exception is an exception.

Based on what news is being suppressed by liberal influence campaigns, I can narrow it to only 3 candidates:
(1) Biden
(2) Warren
(3) Harris

The rest are on the shit list.

>EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH ME IS SHILL
t. Plebit level shill calling me a kike

They run polls with only declared candidates and with those that will probably declare. Biden is in the latter group. Next question (this time with less reeee maybe)?

Mexico will pay for it

If I had to guess Right this instant? Butt guy or Kam H. But I honestly could see many others grabbing D primary voters “hearts”.

I would drop Warren out her own state isn’t in her pocket.

Bernie will never be the Dem nominee because he's an old white male. The identity politics they've pushed so hard for, especially between Obama and Hillary, won't allow for it to happen. Every day that goes by it gets worse and they push moderates away who will be forced to vote for Trump over any candidate they pick.

Yang.

bernie is going to be 79 (seventy-nine) in 2020.
trump is too old as well. bernie's policies are built for the 1800s. Yang is the only candidate confronting realities of the 21st century

Other than my above your reading of that is fine. My point in agreeing with you is that Dems find ways to eliminate their strong candidates.

Trump beat himself you dolt, he's done.

She is pathetic true, but the media has been very friendly to her, grooming her for years, and favorable coverage recently too. She might just be a VP pick for the ticket. IMO she's an insider that pretends to be an outsider.

Recognizing reality isn't cheering anybody on.

Stop shilling this neoliberal gook.

this is the only electoral map that matters.
Bernie is going to win in a landslide.

Attached: did-not-vote-2016-update.png (720x650, 46K)

>probably
How convenient.
He's only there to support the (((moderate))) narrative.

based

Probably Sanders.

Attached: 834798364344.jpg (600x450, 45K)

Israel.

That is why they try to stop him in the primary with vat-grown centrist shiny objects, one after the other.