Drop from 500m

you're retarded

hmm today i will drop tons of water on top of a 800 year old church
oh god oh fuck it crumbled apart oh my god im so fucking retarded
retarded mutts will call this a «shill»

This. The second he suggested it they will refuse to do it cause that will give Trump a victory.

Attached: 1555355481321.jpg (2038x1625, 414K)

paris smells like urine last time I was there, so, I don't doubt it.

see

Water is dropped from low altitude to have biggest effect, there is no "rain".

I've seen a water bomber demonstration at an airshow once it's literally just a fine spray. Liberals are fucking retarded. Seriously retarded.

also this idea of a rain airstrike sounds like some three year old mentality
What Turn Off Fire? Water Does. Rain. :D
fuck you and get cancer fuck you

Attached: Frenchtown-Fire-6-19-17-11.jpg (980x1306, 69K)

>Give a good suggestion and a real life tactic
>no no no you wrong cause orange man stupid
fuck off retard

>Also you need a large body of water, Seine is too small.
It's fed from the English Channel, it runs across the whole country

Attached: 1550776567976.jpg (1075x1349, 633K)

you have no right to discuss our problems
do we fucking care about a leafs opinion? do we fucking care about your retarded solutions?
we didn’t even know what was the cause of the fire when trump proposed to use canadairs on it
so let our firemen and our government do the job meanwhile you and your government jack off to tranny porn you disgusting beta male

It's too narrow for a fucking giant airplane to safely fly and collect water you dumbass.

Not to disagree with you, but considering that all the fire was concentrated in the middle of the cathedral, plus that there was metal scaffolding, no sane heli pilot would drop water from a height sufficient enough to do something to the fire. The draft of hot air coming from the inside would have been too great of a risk.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=9a0_Dh21Bt8

Attached: comment_6lNYlI3yRnjlja0fq23PRByVTqc6YLkL,w400.jpg (400x395, 18K)

reminds me of a really bad water park in turkey where they had a foam part and kids started screaming as the foam was burning them

got some in my eye and it stung worse than lemon, made my skin prune where stray parts touched my skin

holiday rep said they told us the wrong place and we shouldn't went to that one since 2 people died the month before

I'm not surprised because the little shit running the death slide kicked me down it and I had to pull a girl out this weird whirl pool

Attached: 🤣.jpg (500x440, 103K)

also
>flying in paris
drones are shot on sight so i would like to know how the fuck you’re going to manage to let a big ass fucking plane enter the paris air zone shit in time with all the papers that you’ll need lol

unless the rate of water exceeds the rate at which the heat of the fire is evaporating it then it's a waste of time and energy. they would either have to drop the whole load at once or it would be pointless.

ok cool your point?

>you and your government jack off to tranny porn you disgusting beta male
Strong words for somebody who's country is getting fucked three ways till sunday and who's internet freedoms are about to get fucked even harder. Freaking out this fucking hard cause you got proven wrong.

Pierre, leafs are partially french, don't get arrogant now and behave nicely with your half-brother :^)

paris is not ottawa or some retarded canada city
it’s the fucking capital of france
i would rather let it burn than let some foreign person tell me what to do

>850 year old building
>waste of time and energy

Do you eat pound coins with milk for a breakfast you gready cunt?

apparently

you stupid fuck you can use a boat not an airplane. literally every first world city has those giant fire boats.

yes it would be pointless to spray droplets of water from the sky at a slow enough rate that they're near instantly going to be evaporated. it's a waste of resources and time. it doesn't matter how old the fucking building is, it's irrelevant if what you're attempting isn't going to do anything at all.

so they went with hoses instead

The faggot French reporters insisted on making snarky jokes about Trump's suggestion all while their history and culture burns to the ground.

I fucking hate leftists.

Attached: 384512E0-63EF-4808-A04D-A97426E10BE4.jpg (1242x837, 164K)

so why bother at all, right

how about using basic fire fighting tools in a city that has a giant river flowing through it and 1000 year old churches along it.

honk

Attached: fireboat.jpg (2401x1441, 331K)

Theysure do have water for shooting at white people

Attached: 3EAFC24B-6059-4567-AD41-DFF911BCCCFA.jpg (750x375, 29K)

>Safe for shooting at white people
>Not safe for wood and concrete

Attached: 317B8ED3-FD88-49BD-90FA-8CD3ACA8C672.jpg (269x187, 6K)

>500m
I don't speak faggot.

>mfw retards think water bombers just drop a slug of water

>You can’t use water to put out a fire
Really? I wonder what firemen use

Attached: 85EB0E7D-7A54-40E1-9BF1-CE748DA1AF79.gif (500x521, 531K)

Delivering more water > Delivering less water

It will all evaporate before it hits the ground if dropped from 500m.

it would be pointless to drop rain from the sky, yes, so why bother.

France can't afford that shit. Too busy paying for niggers and mudslimes

depends of the cause of the fire
that’s why they don’t use water in fire extinguishers
retard

Just a number, people say it would crush the building, so fly higher. Solved.

hurrrr water put out fire hurrrrrrr some water betr than no water.

throw water on a grease fire.. because.. you know... some water is better than no water.

Attached: 5fd.png (768x752, 88K)

Dayum you’re right muhammad I guess water can’t put out fires

Attached: 1541541167837.webm (672x504, 827K)

i have personally stood right next to one of those helicopters dumping water.
it dropped from about 30 feet away and i didn't even get splashed.

Burning wood is not a grease fire, you dumb fuck.

When you say fly higher then they say it'll evaporate, then you say well fly lower and they say it'll break the building. Then you say well use fireboats and then they say well you can't because it will break the building, then you say "well turn down the pump" and they will say it will evaporate or something. The truth is they spent all their money on immigrants and don't have fireboats or airplanes.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 188K)

Call France at once and tell them to stop using water you normie bot.

Oui we should just let the Dame burn to the ground instead

ok tyrone, ricardo, pajeet, ahmed, chong

i was pointing out how different fires require different approaches why dont you read between the lines you blind fat fucking retard

First time here today wtf is happening

that's literally what they are doing

Attached: boat-2_11661549.jpg (960x720, 123K)

good. Catholics rape children. if you support Catholics you are a pedophile

Ill take jewish tricks for 800 alex. Its very simple, water puts out fire, shoot water at it, done. Easy.

So your sprinkler system just dumps water on you? No wonder France is retarded

instead of water they could use foam you know the little white thing inside of fire extinguishers that have no oxydizers or whatever the fuck they’re called so the fire would not you know
fucking get bigger

the only smart thing you've said in this entire thread

Probably not easy. I imagine fire fighting requires a lot of training, knowing the right pressures to use, how to get the water to the right spots, maybe they DO have to knock a bit down to get the water inside, then back off the pressure - but it's still better than the whole thing coming down. But no, France just parked three fire trucks next to it and sprayed from a standard hydrant. Like pissing on a dumpster fire. Yikes!

Attached: LAFBII-08.jpg (800x600, 63K)

> you can't just drop tanks of water from the sky onto a building fire

Attached: 3yYxM.jpg (964x544, 41K)

This is why I fucking hate the internet. Everyone is a self declared expert on everything.

France is a lost cause.

Delet you Drumpf supporter!!!

they wanted it to burn

sorry I can't hear you over the roar of the fire boats.

Attached: _MG_5100-L.jpg (800x534, 117K)

>t. self-declared expert on internet and psychology

>yes it would be pointless to spray droplets of water from the sky at a slow enough rate that they're near instantly going to be evaporated.

Isn't that actually why we throw water onto fire, evaporative cooling in order to prevent the fire from raging out of control?

5% of the water would even hit the building. trump is dumb as dirt.

Also vapour is choking flames by not letting oxygen in.

France doesn't have any of that.

And any water that gets through the flames contacts the fuelbed, inhibiting further reaction from fuel and oxygen into flame.

Thing is user, I think they wanted it burnt...

That is ok, water does not get destroyed in a process, we have plenty to drop.
850 Year old building is worth more than half a day of fireplains flying around.

no having a sprinkler system installed would have been better. building was fated to burn down deal with it brainlet.

No having climate change drowning it in the sea would be better.

Attached: sx9YF30.jpg (1466x1539, 139K)

>oi mate you got a loicence to put out that fire?

I don't know about Europe, but, while the standard is dry chemical, you can still buy pressurized water extinguishers in the US (with requisite idiot warning about electrical fires).