Can this be achieved with our current trillion debt + pointless war ?
Can this be achieved with our current trillion debt + pointless war ?
Charles Phillips
Other urls found in this thread:
Oliver Clark
Jeremiah Parker
cut all foreign aid
cut all regulations
sure, why not?
Joseph Murphy
blue pilled
Dylan Anderson
China's doing an entire continent with around the same debt
Adam Nguyen
We can't even fix potholes in our roads. How can we expect the future demographic, shitskins, to build or maintain a rail network?
Cooper Wilson
Have faith. Trump will saves us
Oliver Bailey
not in our lifetimes
Brayden Johnson
Why the two huge bubbles in the east coast. Don't tell me mountains and cost, because if that is the case you are already investing in an expensive rail system that will cost more than the tunneling and bridge making to cover those distances.
Caleb Russell
>nothing anywhere near me.
man-rubbing-face-in-pleasure.gif
Matthew Scott
The Hyperloop is a terrible idea, why not a maglev train instead?
William Miller
Rail is for cargo, not people.
Camden Wood
>implying
Mason Flores
>>Government whistleblowers and retired military personnel have publicly stated that during their employment they observed that our government has a massive network of tunnels, with super velocity trains, linking secret underground bases. (Thomas Castello, the former Dulce Base security officer, reported to an associate that Dulce had a tube-shuttle station linked to several other secret underground bases.)
>>At first hearing, these statements seem too far-out to be true. We've all seen television shows about tunnels and they always show how expensive, dangerous, and disastrous near-surface tunnel construction can be. So, obviously an undertaking such as constructing a massive, sci-fi-like network of underground tunnels would take too much money and hundreds of years to build! NOT SO, say scientists!
>>In 1972, Robert M. Salter, lead scientist with the Rand Corporation, announced during an interview with LA Times science writer George Getz, that a high speed system could be built using existing (1972) technologies. He also stated that the system should be built for environmental and economic reasons. What kind of speeds was he talking about? Try 10,000 MPH!
Leo Reyes
Sad but mostly true
youtube.com
Matthew Murphy
Sure hope not, trains are gay and public transportation is bad.
Aiden Adams
We finally saved up enough debt to spend it all on infrastructure!?!?
Jackson Gonzalez
¿como se dice puto?
Leo Wright
Make like a Greyhound and split.
Kayden Rivera
>using air pressure to lift a train inside a partial vacuum
Elon has to be the dumbest motherfucker alive.
Charles Allen
Balance budgets are largely not ideal as you want to avoid long recessionary gaps.
Hunter Torres
No, but because of private land ownership.
Elijah Stewart
65% of federal spending goes to social security, medicare, and other liabilities. The military isn't the problem, fucko.
Logan Rivera
No. Those are already established rights of way for existing rail, there are tremendous wildlife impacts and we already have airplanes for this.
Robert Turner
>trillion debt + pointless war ?
Most of the worlds high speed rail only works due to massive goverment subsides, plus since the USA is not a third world shithole, like china, land costs are enormous.
Stick with planes and normal rail service.
Jonathan Torres
>The military isn't the problem, fucko.
>Bigger budget than the next few countries all combined
Most of the military budget gets fucking wasted too. Remember the F-35 program? What a mess.
Jack Myers
Moving some where in the red if this happens.
Austin Taylor
High-speed rail is fucking pointless dude. It's slower than flying, and costs way way way way way way more to maintain than a bunch of airports. There is 0 reason to do this other then to make America fail.
Isaiah Nelson
Are you kidding? With all the niggers and mexicans running around, the security to maintain such a network would be impossible.
Alexander Hughes
No people in this picture
Aaron Hill
This will be the passengers on the high speed train.
Jack Hall
No, we don't want it here in Florida, fuck your train off some other peninsula
Nolan Gonzalez
And this is for a train that doesn't roll as fast a jet airliner on the ground.
Note, in leftie, bluepilled California, people fought tooth and nail over a pleb-tier high speed rail line. Long distance passenger transit is ideal using aircraft or maybe ballistic spacecraft. The land needs to be preserved as much as possible for crops and nature.
Cameron Martin
Think about who's going to run the trains. Do you think the average American transit worker has the work ethic or attention to detail required to run a high speed rail?
Pic related is the people who run Japan's bullet train system.
Connor Morris
high speed rail needs it's own dedicated lines
especially with ones that don't intersect with roads
Xavier Wood
>maintain
absolutely this!
America could certainly build it, but they wouldn't maintain it. Step by step, the money spent for maintenance will be shifted into other people's pockets until a disaster occurs.
Austin Roberts
What an amazing way for Democrats to move hordes of voters anywhere in the country
Elijah Watson
Meant this
Daniel Richardson
We really don't need a high-speed nigger transport system.